Theoretical and Applied Genetics

, Volume 110, Issue 5, pp 859–864

Wheat genetic diversity trends during domestication and breeding

  • J. C. Reif
  • P. Zhang
  • S. Dreisigacker
  • M. L. Warburton
  • M. van Ginkel
  • D. Hoisington
  • M. Bohn
  • A. E. Melchinger
Original Paper

Abstract

It has been claimed that plant breeding reduces genetic diversity in elite germplasm which could seriously jeopardize the continued ability to improve crops. The main objective of this study was to examine the loss of genetic diversity in spring bread wheat during (1) its domestication, (2) the change from traditional landrace cultivars (LCs) to modern breeding varieties, and (3) 50 years of international breeding. We studied 253 CIMMYT or CIMMYT-related modern wheat cultivars, LCs, and Triticum tauschii accessions, the D-genome donor of wheat, with 90 simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers dispersed across the wheat genome. A loss of genetic diversity was observed from T. tauschii to the LCs, and from the LCs to the elite breeding germplasm. Wheat’s genetic diversity was narrowed from 1950 to 1989, but was enhanced from 1990 to 1997. Our results indicate that breeders averted the narrowing of the wheat germplasm base and subsequently increased the genetic diversity through the introgression of novel materials. The LCs and T. tauschii contain numerous unique alleles that were absent in modern spring bread wheat cultivars. Consequently, both the LCs and T. tauschii represent useful sources for broadening the genetic base of elite wheat breeding germplasm.

References

  1. Anonymous (1972) Genetic vulnerability of major crops. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  2. Cox TS, Murphy JP, Rodgers DM (1986) Changes in genetic diversity in the red and winter wheat regions of the United States. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83:5583–5586PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cox TS, Wilson WJ, Gill DL, Leath S, Bockus WW, Browder LE (1992) Resistance to foliar diseases in a collection of Triticum tauschii germplasm. Plant Dis 76:1061–1064CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dalrymple DG (1986) Development and spread of high-yielding wheat varieties in developing countries, 7th edn. US Agency for International Development, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  5. Devos KM, Bryan GJ, Collins AJ, Stephenson P, Gale MD (1995) Application of two microsatellite sequences in wheat storage proteins as molecular markers. Theor Appl Genet 90:247–252PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dreisigacker S, Zhang P, Warburton M, Skovmand B, Hoisington D, Melchinger AE (2004a) Genetic diversity among and within CIMMYT wheat landrace accessions investigated with SSRs and implications for plant genetic resources management. Crop Sci (in press)Google Scholar
  7. Dreisigacker S, Zhang P, Warburton M, Skovmand B, Hoisington D, Melchinger AE (2004b) SSR and pedigree analyses of genetic diversity among CIMMYT wheat lines targeted to different megaenvironments. Crop Sci 44:381–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dvorák J, Luo MC, Yang ZL, Zhang HB (1998) The structure of the Aegilops tauschii genepool and the evolution of hexaploid wheat. Theor Appl Genet 97:657–670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Evenson RE, Gollin D (2003) Assessing the impact of the green revolution, 1960–2000. Science 300:758–762PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Felsenstein J (1993) phylip—Phylopgeny Inference Package, version 3.5c. Department of Genetics, University of Washington, SeattleGoogle Scholar
  11. Frankel OH (1970) Genetic dangers in the green revolution. World Agric 19:9–14Google Scholar
  12. Frisch M, Bohn M, Melchinger AE (2000) plabsim: software for simulation of marker-assisted backcrossing. J Hered 91:86–87PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Harlan JR (1972) Genetics of disaster. J Environ Qual 1:212–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ihaka R, Gentleman R (1996) A language for data analysis and graphics. J Comput Graph Stat 5:299–314Google Scholar
  15. Kihara H (1944) Discovery of the DD-analyser, one of the ancestors of vulgare wheats (In Japanese). Agric Hortic 19:13–14Google Scholar
  16. Kimber G, Feldman M (2001) Wild wheat. An introduction. Special Report 353, College of Agriculture, University of Missouri, Colombia, pp 129–131Google Scholar
  17. Lelley T, Stachel M, Grausgruber H, Vollmann J (2000) Analysis of relationships between Aegilops tauschii and the D genome of wheat utilizing microsatellites. Genome 43:661–668PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Lubbers EL, Gill KS, Cox TS, Gill BS (1991) Variation of molecular markers among geographically diverse accessions of Triticum tauschii. Genome 34:354–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lynch M, Walsh B (1997) Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits. Sinauer Assoc, SunderlandGoogle Scholar
  20. Malecot G (1948) Les mathématiques de l’hérédite. Masson et Cie, ParisGoogle Scholar
  21. McFadden ES, Sears ER (1946) The origin of Triticum spelta and its free-threshing hexaploid relatives. J Hered 37:81–89PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Melchinger AE, Messmer MM, Lee M, Woodman WL, Lamkey KR (1991) Diversity and relationships among U.S. maize inbreds revealed by restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Crop Sci 31:669–678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nei M (1987) Molecular evolutionary genetics. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Rajaram S (1994) Wheat breeding at CIMMYT: commemorating 50 years of research in Mexico for global wheat improvement. Wheat Special Report No 29. CIMMYT, Mexico D.F.Google Scholar
  25. Rajaram S, van Ginkel M (2001) Mexico: 50 years of international wheat breeding. In: Bonjean AP, Angus WJ (eds) The world wheat book. A history of wheat breading. Lavoisier, Paris, pp 579–610Google Scholar
  26. Reeves T, Rajaram S, van Ginkel M, Trethowan R, Braun H, Cassaday K (1999) New wheats for a secure, sustainable future. CIMMYT, Mexico D.F.Google Scholar
  27. Reif JC, Xia XC, Melchinger AE, Warburton ML, Hoisington D, Beck D, Bohn M, Frisch M (2004) Genetic diversity determined within and among CIMMYT maize populations of tropical, subtropical, and temperate germplasm by SSR markers. Crop Sci 44:326–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rogers JS (1972) Studies in genetics VII. University of Texas Publ, AustinGoogle Scholar
  29. Roussel V, Koenig J, Beckert M, Balfourier F (2004) Molecular diversity in French bread wheat accessions related to temporal trends and breeding programmes. Theor Appl Genet 108:920–930PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Salamini F, Özkan H, Brandolini A, Schäfer-Pregl R, Martin W (2002) Genetics and geography of wild cereal domestication in the Near East. Nat Rev Genet 3:429–441PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Sayre KD, Rajaram S, Fischer RA (1997) Yield potential progress in short bread wheats in northwest Mexico. Crop Sci 37:36–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Smale M, Reynolds MP, Warburton M, Skovmand B, Trethowan R, Singh RP, Ortiz-Monasterio I, Crossa J (2002) Dimensions of diversity in modern spring bread wheat in developing countries from 1965. Crop Sci 42:1766–1779CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Snedecor GW, Cochran WG (1980) Statistical methods. Iowa State University Press, AmesGoogle Scholar
  34. St Martin SK (1982) Effective population size for the soybean improvement program in maturity groups 00 to IV. Crop Sci 22:151–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Talbert LE, Smith LY, Blake MK (1998) More than one origin of hexaploid wheat is indicated by sequence comparison of low-copy DNA. Genome 41:402–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tanksley SD, McCouch R (1997) Seed banks and molecular maps: unlocking genetic potential from the wild. Science 277:1063–1066PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Vigouroux Y, McMullen M, Hittinger CT, Houchins K, Schulz L, Kresovich S, Matsuoka Y, Doebley J (2002) Iden.gifying genes of agronomic importance in maize by screening microsatellites for evidence of selection during domestication. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:9650–9655PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Villareal RL, Davila GF, Kazi AM (1995) Synthetic hexaploids × Triticum aestivum advanced derivatives resistant to karnal bunt (Tilletia indica Mitra). Cereal Res Commun 23:127–132Google Scholar
  39. Zhang P, Dreisigacker S, Melchinger AE, van Ginkel M, Hoisington D, Warburton ML (2005) Quan.gifying novel sequence variation and selective advantage in synthetic hexaploid wheats and their backcross-derived lines using SSR markers. Mol Breed (in press)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. C. Reif
    • 1
  • P. Zhang
    • 2
  • S. Dreisigacker
    • 1
  • M. L. Warburton
    • 2
  • M. van Ginkel
    • 2
  • D. Hoisington
    • 2
  • M. Bohn
    • 3
  • A. E. Melchinger
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Plant Breeding, Seed Science, and Population GeneticsUniversity of HohenheimStuttgartGermany
  2. 2.International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT)MexicoMexico
  3. 3.University of IllinoisUrbanaUSA

Personalised recommendations