Geographical patterns of genetic variation in the world collections of wild annual Cicer characterized by amplified fragment length polymorphisms
- 146 Downloads
Cicer reticulatum, C. echinospermum, C. bijugum, C. judaicum, C. pinnatifidum, C. cuneatum and C. yamashitae are wild annual Cicer species and potential donors of valuable traits to improve chickpea (C. arietinum). As part of a large project to characterize and evaluate wild annual Cicer collections held in the world gene banks, AFLP markers were used to study genetic variation in these species. The main aim of this study was to characterize geographical patterns of genetic variation in wild annual Cicer germplasm. Phylogenetic analysis of 146 wild annual Cicer accessions (including two accessions in the perennial C. anatolicum and six cultivars of chickpea) revealed four distinct groups corresponding well to primary, secondary and tertiary gene pools of chickpea. Some possible misidentified or mislabelled accessions were identified, and ILWC 242 is proposed as a hybrid between C. reticulatum and C. echinospermum. The extent of genetic diversity varied considerably and was unbalanced between species with greatest genetic diversity found in C. judaicum. For the first time geographic patterns of genetic variation in C. reticulatum, C. echinospermum, C. bijugum, C. judaicum and C. pinnatifidum were established using AFLP markers. Based on the current collections the maximum genetic diversity of C. reticulatum, C. echinospermum, C. bijugum and C. pinnatifidum was found in southeastern Turkey, while Palestine was the centre of maximum genetic variation for C. judaicum. This information provides a solid basis for the design of future collections and in situ conservation programs for wild annual Cicer.
KeywordsAFLP Marker Perennial Species Difference Index AFLP Analysis World Collection
Fucheng Shan is grateful to the Grains Research and Development Corporation of Australia (GRDC) for a Postdoctoral Fellowship. We thank Mr. Ted Knights, Dr. Jens Berger, Dr. James Ridsdill-Smith, Dr. Tanveer Khan, Tamworth Centre for Crop Improvement Australia, ICARDA, ICRISAT and USDA for providing germplasm. Molecular analysis for this study was conducted using facilities at the State Agricultural Biotechnology Centre, Murdoch University, Western Australia.
- Abbo S, Berger J, Turner NC (2003) Evolution of cultivated chickpea: four bottlenecks limit diversity and constrain adaptation. Funct Plant Biol 30:1081–1087Google Scholar
- Benham JJ (2001) Genographer version 1.6, Boston. Available via http://hordeum.oscs.montana.edu/genographer
- Berger J, Abbo S, Turner NC (2003) Ecogeography of annual Cicer species: the poor state of the world collection. Crop Sci 43:1076–1090Google Scholar
- Kazan K, Muehlbauer FJ (1991) Allozyme variation and phylogeny in annual species of Cicer (Leguminosae). Plant Syst Evol 175:11–22Google Scholar
- Nei M (1987) Molecular evolutionary genetics. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Serret MD, Udupa SM, Weigand F (1997) Assessment of genetic diversity of cultivated chickpea using microsatellite-derived RFLP markers: implications for origin. Plant Breed 116:573–578Google Scholar
- Singh KB, Ocampo B (1993) Interspecific hybridization in annual Cicer species. J Genet Breed 47:199–204Google Scholar
- Stamigna C, Crino P, Saccardo F (2000) Wild relatives of chickpea: multiple disease resistance and problems to introgression in the cultigen. J Genet Breed 54:213–219Google Scholar
- Swofford DL (2002) PAUP: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (and other methods), version 4.0b10, Sinaur, SunderlandGoogle Scholar
- van der Maesen LJG (1987) Origin, history and taxonomy of chickpea. In: Saxena MC, Singh KB (eds) The chickpea. CABI, UK, pp 11–34Google Scholar