Advertisement

Theoretical and Applied Genetics

, Volume 109, Issue 6, pp 1283–1294 | Cite as

Robust simple sequence repeat markers for spruce (Picea spp.) from expressed sequence tags

  • Dainis Rungis
  • Yanik Bérubé
  • Jun Zhang
  • Steven Ralph
  • Carol E. Ritland
  • Brian E. Ellis
  • Carl Douglas
  • Jörg Bohlmann
  • Kermit Ritland
Original Paper

Abstract

Traditionally, simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers have been developed from libraries of genomic DNA. However, the large, repetitive nature of conifer genomes makes development of robust, single-copy SSR markers from genomic DNA difficult. Expressed sequence tags (ESTs), or sequences of messenger RNA, offer the opportunity to exploit single, low-copy, conserved sequence motifs for SSR development. From a 20,275-unigene spruce EST set, we identified 44 candidate EST-SSR markers. Of these, 25 amplified and were polymorphic in white, Sitka, and black spruce; 20 amplified in all 23 spruce species tested; the remaining five amplified in all except one species. In addition, 101 previously described spruce SSRs (mostly developed from genomic DNA), were tested. Of these, 17 amplified across white, Sitka, and black spruce. The 25 EST-SSRs had approximately 9% less heterozygosity than the 17 genomic-derived SSRs (mean H=0.65 vs 0.72), but appeared to have less null alleles, as evidenced by much lower apparent inbreeding (mean F=0.046 vs 0.126). These robust SSRs are of particular use in comparative studies, and as the EST-SSRs are within the expressed portion of the genome, they are more likely to be associated with a particular gene of interest, improving their utility for quantitative trait loci mapping and allowing detection of selective sweeps at specific genes.

Keywords

Simple Sequence Repeat Marker British Columbia Simple Sequence Repeat Prime Pair Simple Sequence Repeat Motif Genomic Simple Sequence Repeat Marker 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Genome Canada and the Province of British Columbia, through the Genome BC Forestry Genome Project, funded this research. We acknowledge the support of the Vancouver Genome Sciences Centre for EST sequencing and database development. We thank Dr. Sally Aitken (University of British Columbia) for the white spruce collections, Washington Gapare (University of British Columbia) for the Sitka spruce collections, and Dr. Om Rajora (Dalhousie University) for the black spruce collections. Dr. Barry Jaquish of the B.C. Ministry of Forests Kalamalka research station provided the spruce species collection.

References

  1. Arnold C, Rossetto M, McNally J, Henry RJ (2002) The application of SSRs characterized for grape (Vitis vinifera) to conservation studies in Vitaceae. Am J Bot 89:22–28Google Scholar
  2. Bérubé Y, Ritland CE, Ritland K (2003) Isolation, characterization, and cross-species utility of microsatellites in yellow cedar (Chamaecyparis nootkatensis). Genome 46:353–361CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Besnard G, Achere V, Faivre Rampant P, Favre JM, Jeandroz S (2003) A set of cross-species amplifying microsatellite markers developed from DNA sequence databanks in Picea (Pinaceae). Mol Ecol Notes 3:380–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bowcock AM, Ruiz-Linares A, Tomfohrde J, Minch E, Kidd JR, Cavalli-Sforza LL (1994) High resolution of human evolutionary trees with polymorphic microsatellites. Nature 368:455–457CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bruford MW, Wayne RK (1993) Microsatellites and their application to population genetic studies. Curr Opin Genet Dev 3:939–943PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Cardle L, Ramsay L, Milbourne D, Macaulay M, Marshall D, Waugh R (2000) Computational and experimental characterization of physically clustered simple sequence repeats in plants. Genetics 156:847–854PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Dib C, Faure S, Fizames C, Samson D, Drouot N, Vignal A, Millasseau P, Marc S, Hazan J, Seboun E, Lathrop M, Gyapay G, Morissette J, Weissenbach J (1996) A comprehensive genetic map of the human genome based on 5,264 microsatellites. Nature 380:152–154CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Doyle JJ, Doyle JL (1990) Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus 23:13–15Google Scholar
  9. Ewing B, Green P (1998) Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using PHRED II. Error probabilities. Genome Res 8:186–194PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Ewing B, Hillier L, Wendl MC, Green P (1998) Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using PHRED. I. Accuracy assessment. Genome Res 8:175–185PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Felsenstein J (1995) PHYLIP (Phylogeny Inference Package), ver 3.57c, University of WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  12. Goldstein DB, Ruiz Linares A, Cavalli-Sforza LL, Feldman MW (1995) An evaluation of genetic distances for use with microsatellite loci. Genetics 139:463–471PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Hodgetts RB, Aleksiuk MA, Brown A, Clarke C, Macdonald E, Nadeem S, Khasa D (2001) Development of microsatellite markers for white spruce (Picea glauca) and related species. Theor Appl Genet 102:1252–1258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Huang X, Madan A (1999) CAP3: A DNA sequence assembly program. Genome Res 9:868–877CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Jones CJ, Edwards KJ, Castaglione S, Winfield MO, Sala F, van de Wiel C, Bredemeijer G, Vosman B, Matthes M, Daly A, Brettschneider R, Bettini P, Buiatti M, Maestri E, Malcevschi A, Marmiroli N, Aert R, Volckaert G, Rueda J, Linacero R, Vazquez A, Karp A (1997) Reproducibility testing of RAPD, AFLP and SSR markers in plants by a network of European laboratories. Mol Breed 3:381–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Morgante M, Hanafey M, Powell W (2002) Microsatellites are preferentially associated with nonrepetitive DNA in plant genomes. Nat Genet 30:194–200CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Neff BD (2004) Mean d2 and divergence time: transformations and standardizations. J Hered 95:165–171CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Oetting WS, Lee HK, Flanders DJ, Wiesner GL, Sellers TA, King RA (1995) Linkage analysis with multiplexed short tandem repeat polymorphisms using infrared fluorescence and M13 tailed primers. Genomics 30:450–458CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Paglia G, Morgante M (1998) PCR-based multiplex DNA fingerprinting techniques for the analysis of conifer genomes. Mol Breed 4:173–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pfeiffer A, Olivieri AM, Morgante M (1997) Identification and characterization of microsatellites in Norway spruce (Picea abies K.). Genome 40:411–419PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Queller DC, Strassmann JE, Hughes CR (1993) Microsatellites and kinship. Trends Ecol Evol 8:285–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rafalski A (2002) Applications of single nucleotide polymorphisms in crop genetics. Curr Opin Plant Biol 5:94–100CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Rajora OP, Rahman MH, Dayanandan S, Mosseler A (2000) Isolation, characterization, inheritance and linkage of microsatellite DNA markers in white spruce (Picea glauca) and their usefulness in other spruce species. Mol Gen Genet 264:871–882Google Scholar
  24. Ritland C, Ritland K (2000) DNA fragment markers in plants. In: Baker AJ (ed) Molecular methods in ecology. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 208–234Google Scholar
  25. Rozen S, Skaletsky HJ (2000) Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers. In: Krawetz S, Misener S (eds) Bioinformatics methods and protocols: methods in molecular biology. Humana Press, Totowa, pp 365–386Google Scholar
  26. Saha S, Karaca M, Jenkins JN, Zipf AE, Reddy OUK, Kantety RV (2003) Simple sequence repeats as useful resources to study transcribed genes of cotton. Euphytica 130:355–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Saitou N, Nei M (1987) The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4:406–425PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Schlötterer C (2001) Genealogical inference of closely related species based on microsatellites. Genet Res 78:209–212PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Scotti I, Magni F, Fink R, Powell W, Binelli G, Hedley PE (2000) Microsatellite repeats are not randomly distributed within Norway spruce (Picea abies K.) expressed sequences. Genome 43:41–46CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Scotti I, Magni F, Paglia G, Morgante M (2002a) Trinucleotide microsatellites in Norway spruce (Picea abies): their features and the development of molecular markers. Theor Appl Genet 106:40–50PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Scotti I, Paglia G, Magni F, Morgante M (2002b) Efficient development of dinucleotide microsatellite markers in Norway spruce (Picea abies Karst.) through dot-blot selection. Theor Appl Genet 104:1035–1041CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Sigurgeirsson A, Szmidt AE (1993) Phylogenetic and biogeographic implications of chloroplast DNA variation in Picea. Nord J Bot 13:233–246Google Scholar
  33. Soares MB, Bonaldo MF, Jelene, P, Su L, Lawton L, Efstratiadis A (1994) Construction and characterization of a normalized cDNA library. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91:9228–9232PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Squirrell J, Hollingsworth PM, Woodhead M, Russell J, Lowe AJ, Gibby M, Powell W (2003) How much effort is required to isolate nuclear microsatellites from plants? Mol Ecol 12:1339–1348CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Ven WTG van de, McNicol RJ (1996) Microsatellites as DNA markers in Sitka spruce. Theor Appl Genet 93:613–617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Vigouroux Y, McMullen M, Hittinger CT, Houchins K, Schulz L, Kresovich S, Matsuoka Y, Doebley J (2002) Identifying genes of agronomic importance in maize by screening microsatellites for evidence of selection during domestication Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:9650–9655CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dainis Rungis
    • 1
  • Yanik Bérubé
    • 1
  • Jun Zhang
    • 1
  • Steven Ralph
    • 1
  • Carol E. Ritland
    • 1
  • Brian E. Ellis
    • 2
    • 3
  • Carl Douglas
    • 2
  • Jörg Bohlmann
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Kermit Ritland
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Forest SciencesUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada
  2. 2.Department of BotanyUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada
  3. 3.Biotechnology LaboratoryUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations