Theoretical and Applied Genetics

, Volume 107, Issue 7, pp 1157–1168

Cre/lox-mediated marker gene excision in transgenic maize (Zea mays L.) plants

  • W. Zhang
  • S. Subbarao
  • P. Addae
  • A. Shen
  • C. Armstrong
  • V. Peschke
  • L. Gilbertson
Article

Abstract.

After the initial transformation and tissue culture process is complete, selectable marker genes, which are used in virtually all transformation approaches, are not required for the expression of the gene of interest in the transgenic plants. There are several advantages to removing the selectable marker gene after it is no longer needed, such as enabling the reuse of selectable markers and simplifying transgene arrays. We have tested the Cre/lox system from bacteriophage P1 for its ability to precisely excise stably integrated marker genes from chromosomes in transgenic maize plants. Two strategies, crossing and autoexcision, have been tested and demonstrated. In the crossing strategy, plants expressing the Cre recombinase are crossed with plants bearing a transgene construct in which the selectable marker gene is flanked by directly repeated lox sites. Unlike previous reports in which incomplete somatic and germline excision were common, in our experiments complete somatic and germline marker gene excision occurred in the F1 plants from most crosses with multiple independent Cre and lox lines. In the autoexcision strategy, the cre gene, under the control of a heat shock-inducible promoter, is excised along with the nptII marker gene. Our results show that a transient heat shock treatment of primary transgenic callus is sufficient for inducing cre and excising the cre and nptII genes. Genetic segregation and molecular analysis confirmed that marker gene removal is precise, complete and stable. The autoexcision strategy provides a way of removing the selectable marker gene from callus or other tissues such as embryos and kernels.

References

  1. Ainley WM, Key JL (1990) Development of a heat shock inducible expression cassette for plants: characterization of parameters for its use in transient expression assays. Plant Mol Biol 14:949–967PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Armstrong CL, Rout J (2001) A novel Agrobacterium-mediated transformation method. PCT Patent Application W00109302-A2Google Scholar
  3. Bayley CC, Morgan M, Dale EC, Ow DW (1992) Exchange of gene activity in transgenic plants catalyzed by the Cre -lox site-specific recombination system. Plant Mol Biol 18:353–361PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bevan MW, Flavell RB, Chilton MD (1983) A chimeric antibiotic resistance gene as a selectable marker for plant cell transformation. Biotechnology 24:367–370Google Scholar
  5. Brown SM, Santino C (1999) Enhanced expression in plants. US Patent no. 5859347Google Scholar
  6. Cheng M, Fry JE, Pang S, Zhou H, Hironaka CM, Duncan DR, Conner TW, Wan Y (1997) Genetic transformation of wheat mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Plant Physiol 115:971–980Google Scholar
  7. Dale EC, Ow DW (1990) Intra- and intermolecular site-specific recombination in plant cells mediated by bacteriophage P1 recombinase. Gene 91:79–85CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Dale EC, Ow DW (1991) Gene transfer with subsequent removal of the selection gene from the host genome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88:10558–10562PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Daley M, Knauf V, Summerfelt KR, Turner JC (1998) Co-transformation with one Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain containing two binary plasmids as a method for producing marker-free transgenic plants. Plant Cell Rep 17:489–496Google Scholar
  10. De Block M, Debrouwer D (1991) Two T-DNA's co-transformed into Brassica napus by a double Agrobacterium tumefaciens infection are mainly integrated at the same locus. Theor Appl Genet 82:257–263Google Scholar
  11. de Frammond A, Back E, Chilton W, Kayes L, Chilton M-D (1986) Two unlinked T-DNAs can transform the same tobacco plant cell and segregate in the F1 generation. Mol Gen Genet 202:125–131Google Scholar
  12. De Neve M, De Buck S, Jacobs A, Van Montagu M, Depicker A (1997) T-DNA integration patterns in co-transformed plant cells suggest that T-DNA repeats originate from co-integration of separate T-DNAs. Plant J 11:15–29PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Depicker A, Herman L, Jacobs A, Schell J, Van Montagu M (1985) Frequencies of simultaneous transformation with different T-DNAs and their relevance to the Agrobacterium/plant cell interaction. Mol Gen Genet 201:477–484Google Scholar
  14. Duncan DR, Williams ME, Zehr BE, Widholm JM (1985) The production of callus capable of plant regeneration from immature embryos of numerous Zea mays genotypes. Planta 165:322–332Google Scholar
  15. Hoa TTC, Bong BB, Huq E, Hodge TK (2002) Cre/lox site-specific recombination controls the excision of a transgene from the rice genome. Theor Appl Genet 104:518–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hoess RH, Wierzbicki A, Abremski K (1986) The role of the loxP spacer region in P1 site-specific recombination. Nucleic Acids Res 14:2287–2300PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Hoff T, Schnorr KM, Mundy J (2001) A recombinase-mediated transcriptional induction system in transgenic plants. Plant Mol Biol 45:41–49CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Howe AR, Feng PCC (2003) Assay for the detection of NPTII expression in Plants. US Patent Application 20030017599A1Google Scholar
  19. Ishida Y, Saito H, Ohta S, Hiei Y, Komari T, Kumashiro T (1996) High efficiency transformation of maize (Zea mays L.) mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Natl Biotechnol 14:745–750Google Scholar
  20. Kay R, Chan A, Daly M, McPherson J (1987) Duplication of CaMV 35S promoter sequences creates a strong enhancer for plant genes. Science 236: 1299–1302Google Scholar
  21. Kilby NJ, Davies GJ, Snaith MR (1995) FLP recombinase in transgenic plants: constitutive activity in stably transformed tobacco and generation of marked cell clones in Arabidopsis. Plant J 8:637–652CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Komari T, Hiei Y, Saito Y, Murai N, Kumashiro T (1996) Vectors carrying two separate T-DNAs for co-transformation of higher plants mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens and segregation of transformants free from selection markers. Plant J 10:165–174PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Koncz C, Schell J (1986) The promoter of TL-DNA gene 5 controls the tissue specific expression of chimaeric genes carried by a novel type of Agrobacterium binary vector. Mol Gen Genet 204:383–396Google Scholar
  24. Lichtenstein CPJHB, Pazkowski J, Hohn B (1994) Intrachromosomal recombination between genomic repeats. In: Paszkowski J (ed) Homologous recombination and gene silencing in plants. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 95–122Google Scholar
  25. Lloyd AM, Davis RW (1994) Functional expression of the yeast FLP/FRT site-specific recombination system in Nicotiana tabacum. Mol Gen Genet 242:653–657PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Lu H-J, Zhou X-R, Gong Z-X, Upadhyaya NM (2001) Generation of selectable marker-free transgenic rice using double right-border (DRB) binary vectors. Aust J Plant Physiol 28:241–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Luo H, Lyznik LA, Gidoni D, Hodges TK (2000) FLP-mediated recombination for use in hybrid plant production. Plant J 23:423–430CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Lyznik LA, Mitchell JC, Hirayama L, Hodges TK (1993) Activity of yeast FLP recombinase in maize and rice protoplasts. Nucleic Acids Res 21:969–975PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Lyznik LA, Hirayama L, Rao KV, Abad A, Hodges TK (1995) Heat-inducible expression of FLP gene in maize cells. Plant J 8:177–186CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Maeser S, Kahmann R (1991) The Gin recombinase of phage Mu can catalyse site-specific recombination in plant protoplasts. Mol Gen Genet 230:170–176PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. McCormac AC, Fowler MR, Chen DF, Elliott MC (2001) Efficient co-transformation of Nicotiana tabacum by two independent T-DNAs, the effect of T-DNA size and implications for genetic separation. Trans Res 10:143–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McElroy D, Zhang W, Cao J, Wu R (1990) Isolation of an efficient actin promoter for use in rice transformation. Plant Cell 2:163–171PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. McKnight T, Lillis M, Simpson R (1987) Segregation of genes transferred to one plant cell from two separate Agrobacterium strains. Plant Mol Biol 8:439–445Google Scholar
  34. Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15:473–497Google Scholar
  35. Odell J, Caimi P, Sauer B, Russell S (1990) Site-directed recombination in the genome of transgenic tobacco. Mol Gen Genet 223:369–378PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Onouchi H, Yokoi K, Machida C, Matsuzaki H, Oshima Y, Matsuoka K, Nakamura K, Machida Y (1991) Operation of an efficient site-specific recombination system of Zygosaccharomyces rouxii in tobacco cells. Nucleic Acids Res 19:6373–6378PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Pang SZ, DeBoer DL, Wan Y, Ye G, Layton JG, Neher MK, Armstrong CL, Fry JE, Hinchee MA, Fromm ME (1996) An improved green fluorescent protein gene as a vital marker in plants. Plant Physiol 112:893–900PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Russell SH, Hoopes JL, Odell JT (1992) Directed excision of a transgene from the plant genome. Mol Gen Genet 234:49–59PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, ManiatisT (1989) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring HarborGoogle Scholar
  40. Sonti RV, Tissier AF, Wong D, Viret JF, Signer ER (1995) Activity of the yeast FLP recombinase in Arabidopsis. Plant Mol Biol 28:1127–1132PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Srivastava V, Anderson OD, Ow DW (1999) Single-copy transgenic wheat generated through the resolution of complex integration patterns. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:11,117–11,121PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Sugita K, Kasahara T, Matsunaga E, Ebinuma H (2000) A transformation vector for the production of marker-free transgenic plants containing a single copy transgene at high frequency. Plant J 22:461–469CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Vancanneyt G, Schmidt R, O'Connor-Sanchez A, Willmitzer L, Rocha-Sosa M (1990) Construction of an intron-containing marker gene: splicing of the intron in transgenic plants and its use in monitoring early events in Agrobacterium-mediated plant transformation. Mol Gen Genet 220:245–250PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Wang Y, Zhang W, Cao J, McElroy D, Wu R (1992) Characterization of cis-acting elements regulating transcription from the promoter of a constitutively active rice actin gene. Mol Cell Biol 12:3399–3406PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Xing A, Zhang Z, Sato S, Staswick P, Clemente T (2000) The use of the two T-DNA binary system to derive marker-free transgenic soybeans. In Vitro Cell. Dev Biol – Plant 36:456–463Google Scholar
  46. Zhang W, McElroy D, Wu R (1991) Analysis of rice Act1 5′ region activity in transgenic rice plants. Plant Cell 3:1155–1165PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Zubko E, Scutt C, Meyer P (2000) Intrachromosomal recombination between attP regions as a tool to remove selectable marker genes from tobacco transgenes. Nat Biotechnol 18:442–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Zuo J, Niu QW, Moller SG, Chua NH (2001) Chemical-regulated, site-specific DNA excision in transgenic plants. Nat Biotechnol 19:157–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. Zhang
    • 1
  • S. Subbarao
    • 1
  • P. Addae
    • 1
  • A. Shen
    • 1
  • C. Armstrong
    • 1
  • V. Peschke
    • 1
  • L. Gilbertson
    • 1
  1. 1.Monsanto Company, 700 Chesterfield Parkway North, St. Louis, MO 63017-1732

Personalised recommendations