Theoretical and Applied Genetics

, Volume 107, Issue 2, pp 359–370 | Cite as

QTL analysis of morphological traits in eggplant and implications for conservation of gene function during evolution of solanaceous species

  • A. Frary
  • S. Doganlar
  • M. C. Daunay
  • S. D. Tanksley
Article

Abstract.

An interspecific F2 population from a cross between cultivated eggplant, Solanum melongena, and its wild relative, S. linnaeanum, was analyzed for quantitative trait loci (QTL) affecting leaf, flower, fruit and plant traits. A total of 58 plants were genotyped for 207 restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) markers and phenotyped for 18 characters. One to eight loci were detected for each trait with a total of 63 QTL identified. Overall, 46% of the QTL had allelic effects that were the reverse of those predicted from the parental phenotypes. Wild alleles that were agronomically superior to the cultivated alleles were identified for 42% of the QTL identified for flowering time, flower and fruit number, fruit set, calyx size and fruit glossiness. Comparison of the map positions of eggplant loci with those for similar traits in tomato, potato and pepper revealed that 12 of the QTL have putative orthologs in at least one of these other species and that putative orthology was most often observed between eggplant and tomato. Traits showing potential orthology were: leaf length, shape and lobing; days to flowering; number of flowers per inflorescence; plant height and apex, leaf and stem hairiness. The functionally conserved loci included a major leaf lobing QTL (llob6.1) that is putatively orthologous to the potato leaf (c) and/or Petroselinum (Pts) mutants of tomato, two flowering time QTL (dtf1.1, dtf2.1) that also have putative counterparts in tomato and four QTL for trichomes that have potential orthologs in tomato and potato. These results support the mounting evidence of conservation of gene function during the evolution of eggplant and its relatives from their last common ancestor and indicate that this conservation was not limited to domestication traits.

Keywords.

Quantitative trait loci Solanaceae Solanum melongena Solanum linnaeanum Interspecific 

References

  1. Baha-Eldin SA, Blackhurst HT, Perry BA (1967a) The inheritance of certain quantitative characters in eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) I. Inheritance of plant height, flowering date and fruit shape. Proc Am Soc Hortic Sci 92:480–489Google Scholar
  2. Baha-Eldin SA, Blackhurst HT, Perry BA (1967b) The inheritance of certain quantitative characters in eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) II. Inheritance of yield, fruit number and fruit weight. Proc Am Soc Hortic Sci 92:490–497Google Scholar
  3. Ben Chaim A, Paran I, Grube RC, Jahn M, van Wijk R, Peleman J (2001) QTL mapping of fruit-related traits in pepper (Capsicum annuum). Theor Appl Genet 102:1016–1028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bernatzky R, Tanksley SD (1986) Toward a saturated linkage map in tomato based on isozymes and random cDNA sequences. Genetics 112:887–898Google Scholar
  5. Bonierbale MW, Plaisted RL, Pineda O, Tanksley SD (1994) QTL analysis of trichome-mediated insect resistance in potato. Theor Appl Genet 87:973–987Google Scholar
  6. Collonnier C, Fock I, Kashyap V, Rotino GL, Daunay MC, Lian Y, Mariska IK, Rajam MV, Servaes A, Ducreux G, Sihachakr D (2001) Applications of biotechnology in eggplant. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 65:91–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Daunay MC, Lester RN, Laterrot H (1991) The use of wild species for the genetic improvement of brinjal eggplant (Solanum melongena) and tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum). In: Hawkes JG, Lester RN, Nee M, Estrada N (eds) Solanaceae III. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, pp 389–412Google Scholar
  8. Daunay MC, Dalmon A, Lester RN (1999) Management of a collection of Solanum species for eggplant (Solanum melongena) breeding purposes. In: Nee M, Symon DE, Lester RN, Jessop JP (eds) Solanaceae IV. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, pp 369–383Google Scholar
  9. Daunay MC, Lester RN, Gebhardt C, Hennart JW, Jahn M, Frary A, Doganlar S (2001) Genetic resources of eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) and allied species: a new challenge for molecular geneticists and eggplant breeders. In: van den Berg RG, Barendse GW, Mariani C (eds) Solanaceae V. Nijmegen University Press, Nijmegen, pp 251–274Google Scholar
  10. de Vicente MC, Tanksley SD (1993) QTL analysis of transgressive segregation in an interspecific tomato cross. Genetics 134:585–596PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Doganlar S, Frary A, Daunay MC, Lester RN, Tanksley SD (2002a) A comparative genetic linkage map of eggplant (Solanum melongena) and its implications for genome evolution in the Solanaceae. Genetics 161:1697–1711PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Doganlar S, Frary A, Daunay MC, Lester RN, Tanksley SD (2002b) Conservation of gene function in the Solanaceae as revealed by comparative mapping of domestication traits in eggplant. Genetics 161:1713–1726PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. FAO (2000) Agricultural production data collection. http://apps.fao.orgGoogle Scholar
  14. Grandillo S, Tanksley SD (1996) Analysis of horticultural traits differentiating the cultivated tomato from the closely related species Lycopersicon pimpinellifolium. Theor Appl Genet 92:935–951CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hareven D, Gutfinger T, Parnis A, Eshed Y, Lifschitz E (1996) The making of a compound leaf: genetic manipulation of leaf architecture in tomato. Cell 84:735–744PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Isshiki S, Okubo H, Fujieda K (1994) Phylogeny of eggplant and related Solanum species constructed by allozyme variation. Sci Hortic 59:171–176Google Scholar
  17. Kakizaki Y (1931) Hybrid vigor in eggplants and its practical utilization. Genetics 16:1–25Google Scholar
  18. Kessler S, Kim M, Pham T, Weber N, Sinha N (2001) Mutations altering leaf morphology in tomato. Int J Plant Sci 162:475–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Liharska TB, Hontelez J, van Kammen A, Zabel P, Koornneef M (1997) Molecular mapping around the centromere of tomato chromosome 6 using irradiation-induced deletions. Theor Appl Genet 95:969–974CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mace ES, Lester RN, Gebhardt CG (1999) AFLP analysis of genetic relationships among the cultivated eggplant, Solanum melongena L., and wild relatives (Solanaceae). Theor Appl Genet 99:626–633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Maliepaard C, Bas N, van Heusden S, Kos J, Pet G, Verkerk R, Vrielink R, Zabel P, Lindhout P (1995) Mapping of QTLs for glandular trichome densities and Trialeurodes vaporariorum (greenhouse whitefly) resistance in an F2 from Lycopersicon esculentum × L. hirsutum f. glabratum. Heredity 75:425–433Google Scholar
  22. Nelson JC (1997) qgene: software for marker-based genomic analysis and breeding. Mol Breed 3:229–235Google Scholar
  23. Nunome T, Ishiguro K, Yoshida T, Hirai M (2001) Mapping of fruit shape and color development traits in eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) based on RAPD and AFLP markers. Breed Sci 51:19–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Odland ML, Noll JC (1948) Hybrid vigor and combining ability in eggplant. Proc Am Soc Hortic Sci 51:417–422Google Scholar
  25. Paran I, Goldman I, Zamir D (1997) QTL analysis of morphological traits in a tomato recombinant inbred line population. Genome 40:242–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Phatak SC, Liu J, Jaworski CA, Sultanbawa AF (1991) Functional male sterility in eggplant: inheritance and linkage to purple fruit color. J Hered 82:81–83Google Scholar
  27. Rick CM (1980) Petroselinum (Pts), a new marker for chromosome 6. TGC Rep 30:32Google Scholar
  28. Sakata Y, Lester RN (1994) Chloroplast DNA diversity in eggplant (Solanum melongena) and its related species S. incanum and S. marginatum. Euphytica 80:1–4Google Scholar
  29. Tanksley SD, McCouch SR (1997) Seed banks and molecular maps: unlocking genetic potential from the wild. Science 277:1063–1066PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Tanksley SD, Ganal MW, Prince JP, de Vicente MC, Bonierbale MW, Broun P, Fulton TM, Giovannoni JJ, Grandillo S, Martin GB, Messeguer R, Miller JC, Miller L, Paterson AH, Pineda O, Roder S, Wing RA, Wu W, Young ND (1992) High density molecular linkage maps of the tomato and potato genomes. Genetics 132:1141–1160PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Tanksley SD, Grandillo S, Fulton TM, Zamir D, Eshed Y, Petiard V, Lopez J, Beck-Bunn T (1996) Advanced backcross QTL analysis in a cross between an elite processing line of tomato and its wild relative L. pimpinellifolium. Theor Appl Genet 92:213–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tigchelaar EC, Janick J, Erickson HT (1968) The genetics of anthocyanin coloration in eggplant (Solanum melongena L.). Genetics 60:475–491Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Frary
    • 1
    • 3
  • S. Doganlar
    • 1
    • 3
  • M. C. Daunay
    • 2
  • S. D. Tanksley
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Plant Breeding and Department of Plant Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
  2. 2.INRA, Unité de Génétique et Amélioration des Fruits et Légumes, BP94, 84143 Montfavet cedex, France
  3. 3.Department of Biology, Izmir Institute of Technology, Gülbahçe Campus, Urla 35437, Izmir, Turkey

Personalised recommendations