Advertisement

Der Radiologe

, Volume 53, Issue 2, pp 109–115 | Cite as

Indikationen und Technik der fetalen Magnetresonanztomographie

  • U. AsenbaumEmail author
  • P.C. Brugger
  • R. Woitek
  • J. Furtner
  • D. Prayer
Leitthema

Zusammenfassung

Klinisches/methodisches Problem

Evaluierung und Bestätigung von im pränatalen Ultraschall entdeckten Pathologien.

Radiologische Standardverfahren

Ultraschall und Magnetresonanztomographie.

Methodische Innovationen

Pränatale Untersuchungsmethode.

Leistungsfähigkeit

Die fetale MRT ist inzwischen als ergänzende Methode zum pränatalen Ultraschall anerkannt.

Bewertung

Die fetale MRT soll als additive Methode bei klinischer Relevanz, nicht jedoch als Routinescreeningverfahren während der Schwangerschaft angewendet werden.

Empfehlung für die Praxis

Durchführung ausschließlich an einem Perinatalzentrum nach vorangegangenem Level-III-Ultraschall.

Schlüsselwörter

Ultraschall Fetale Pathologien Sequenzen Therapieoptionen Prognose 

Indications and technique of fetal magnetic resonance imaging

Abstract

Clinical/methodical issue

Evaluation and confirmation of fetal pathologies previously suspected or diagnosed with ultrasound.

Standard radiological methods

Ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Methodical innovations

Technique for prenatal fetal examination.

Performance

Fetal MRI is an established supplementary technique to prenatal ultrasound.

Achievements

Fetal MRI should only be used as an additional method in prenatal diagnostics and not for routine screening.

Practical recommendations

Fetal MRI should only be performed in perinatal medicine centers after a previous level III ultrasound examination.

Keywords

Ultrasound Fetal pathologies Sequences Therapy options Prognosis 

Notes

Interessenkonflikt

Die korrespondierende Autorin gibt für sich und ihre Koautoren an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Literatur

  1. 1.
    ACOG Committee Opinion (2004) Number 299, September 2004 (replaces No. 158, September 1995). Guidelines for diagnostic imaging during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 104:647–651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baker PN, Johnson IR, Harvey PR et al (1994) A three-year follow-up of children imaged in utero with echo-planar magnetic resonance. Am J Obstet Gynecol 170:32–33PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Berger-Kulemann V, Brugger PC, Pugash D et al (2012) MR spectroscopy of the fetal brain: is it possible without sedation? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, in pressGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Blaicher W, Brugger PC, Mittermayer C et al (2006) Magnetic resonance imaging of the normal placenta. Eur J Radiol 57:256–260PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brugger PC, Mittermayer C, Prayer D (2006) A new look at the fetus: thick-slab T2-weighted sequences in fetal MRI. Eur J Radiol 57:182–186PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brugger PC, Prayer D (2012) Actual imaging time in fetal MRI. Eur J Radiol 81:e194–e196PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Brugger PC, Stuhr F, Lindner C et al (2006) Methods of fetal MR: beyond T2-weighted imaging. Eur J Radiol 57:172–181PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Brugger PC, Weber M, Prayer D (2010) Magnetic resonance imaging of the fetal gallbladder and bile. Eur Radiol 20:2862–2869PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Clements H, Duncan KR, Fielding K et al (2000) Infants exposed to MRI in utero have a normal paediatric assessment at 9 months of age. Br J Radiol 73:190–194PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Coakley FV, Lopoo JB, Lu Y et al (2000) Normal and hypoplastic fetal lungs: volumetric assessment with prenatal single-shot rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement MR imaging. Radiology 216:107–111PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    De Wilde JP, Rivers AW, Price DL (2005) A review of the current use of magnetic resonance imaging in pregnancy and safety implications for the fetus. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 87:335–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Duncan KR, Gowland PA, Freeman A et al (1999) The changes in magnetic resonance properties of the fetal lungs: a first result and a potential tool for the non-invasive in utero demonstration of fetal lung maturation. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 106:122–125PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ghi T, Tani G, Savelli L et al (2003) Prenatal imaging of facial clefts by magnetic resonance imaging with emphasis on the posterior palate. Prenat Diagn 23:970–975PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Girard N, Fogliarini C, Viola A et al (2006) MRS of normal and impaired fetal brain development. Eur J Radiol 57:217–225PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kasprian G, Balassy C, Brugger PC et al (2006) MRI of normal and pathological fetal lung development. Eur J Radiol 57:261–270PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kasprian G, Del Rio M, Prayer D (2010) Fetal diffusion imaging: pearls and solutions. Top Magn Reson Imaging 21:387–394PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kok RD, Van Den Berg PP, Van Den Bergh AJ et al (2002) Maturation of the human fetal brain as observed by 1H MR spectroscopy. Magn Reson Med 48:611–616PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kostovic I, Judas M, Rados M et al (2002) Laminar organization of the human fetal cerebrum revealed by histochemical markers and magnetic resonance imaging. Cereb Cortex 12:536–544PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Levine D, Hulka CA, Ludmir J et al (1997) Placenta accreta: evaluation with color Doppler US, power Doppler US, and MR imaging. Radiology 205:773–776PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Linduska N, Dekan S, Messerschmidt A et al (2009) Placental pathologies in fetal MRI with pathohistological correlation. Placenta 30:555–559PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Moreira NC, Teixeira J, Raininko R et al (2011) The ear in fetal MRI: what can we really see? Neuroradiology 53:1001–1008PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Nemec SF, Nemec U, Brugger PC et al (2012) MR imaging of the fetal musculoskeletal system. Prenat Diagn 32:205–213PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Nemec U, Nemec SF, Krakow D et al (2011) The skeleton and musculature on foetal MRI. Insights Imaging 2:309–318PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Palacios Jaraquemada JM, Bruno CH (2005) Magnetic resonance imaging in 300 cases of placenta accreta: surgical correlation of new findings. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 84:716–724Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rados M, Judas M, Kostovic I (2006) In vitro MRI of brain development. Eur J Radiol 57:187–198PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Roberts MD, Lange RC, Mccarthy SM (1995) Fetal anatomy with magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 13:645–649PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ros PR, Li KC, Vo P et al (1990) Preautopsy magnetic resonance imaging: initial experience. Magn Reson Imaging 8:303–308PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Thayyil S, Chandrasekaran M, Chitty LS et al (2010) Diagnostic accuracy of post-mortem magnetic resonance imaging in fetuses, children and adults: a systematic review. Eur J Radiol 75:e142–e148PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Widjaja E, Geibprasert S, Blaser S et al (2009) Abnormal fetal cerebral laminar organization in cobblestone complex as seen on post-mortem MRI and DTI. Pediatr Radiol 39:860–864PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Woitek R, Brugger PC, Kasprian G et al (2009) Development of fetal eye movements and gaze assessed by MRI. RSNA AbstractbookGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • U. Asenbaum
    • 1
    Email author
  • P.C. Brugger
    • 2
  • R. Woitek
    • 1
  • J. Furtner
    • 1
  • D. Prayer
    • 1
  1. 1.Abteilung für Neuroradiologie und Muskuloskelettale Radiologie, Universitätsklinik für RadiodiagnostikMedizinische Universität WienWienÖsterreich
  2. 2.Zentrum für Anatomie und ZellbiologieMedizinische Universität WienWienÖsterreich

Personalised recommendations