Fehlermöglichkeiten bei Gefäßpatienten durch Normvarianten der A. pharyngea ascendens
Potential errors in vascular patients due to anatomical variants of the ascending pharyngeal artery
Notes
Interessenkonflikt
C. Pohlmann, P.P. Urban, R. Brüning, J. Höltje und C. Arning geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.
Literatur
- 1.Bowen JC, Garcia M, Garrard L, Mankin CJ, Fluke MM (1997) Anomalous branch of the internal carotid artery maintains patency distal to a complete occlusion diagnosed by duplex scan. J Vasc Surg 26:164–167CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 2.Cavalcanti DD, Reis CVC, Hanel R et al (2009) The ascending pharyngeal artery and its relevance for neurosurgical and endovascular procedures. Neurosurgery 65(ONS Suppl 1):114–120PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 3.Eckstein HH, Kühnl A, Dörfler A et al (2013) Clinical Practice Guideline: The diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of extracranial carotid stenosis – a multidisciplinary German-Austrian guideline based on evidence and consensus. Dtsch Arztebl Int 110:468–476PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 4.Geibprasert S, Pongpech S, Armstrong D, Krings T (2009) Dangerous extracranial-intracranial anastomoses and supply to the cranial nerves: vessels the neurointerventionalist needs to know. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 30:1459–1468CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 5.Hacein-Bey L, Daniels DL, Ulmer JL et al (2002) The ascending pharyngeal artery: branches, anastomoses, and clinical significance. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 23:1246–1256PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 6.Small JE, Harrington J, Watkins E (2014) Prevalence of arterial branches arising from the extracranial internal carotid artery on CT angiography. Surg Radiol Anat 36:789–793CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 7.Wej CJ, Chang FC, Chiou SY et al (2004) Aberrant ascending pharyngeal artery mimicking a partially occluded internal carotid artery. J Neuroimaging 14:67–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copyright information
© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016