Der Nervenarzt

, Volume 84, Issue 9, pp 1123–1135

Pädophilie

Ätiologie, Diagnostik und Therapie
CME Zertifizierte Fortbildung

Zusammenfassung

Sexuelle Übergriffe zum Nachteil eines Kindes zählen zu den schwerwiegendsten negativen Ereignissen für dessen gesunde psychische Entwicklung. Die Pädophilie ist nach den aktuellen psychiatrischen Klassifikationssystemen als eine anhaltende oder dominierende sexuelle Präferenz für präpubertäre Kinder definiert. Nur etwa die Hälfte aller Kindesmissbrauchstäter erfüllt die diagnostischen Kriterien der Pädophilie. Im vorliegenden Beitrag werden die bei der Diagnosestellung und differenzialdiagnostischen Abgrenzung zu anderen Störungen zu beachtenden Kriterien erläutert, epidemiologische und ätiologische Erkenntnisse vermittelt. Ätiologisch wird gegenwärtig von multikausalen Wirkmechanismen ausgegangen; hierbei sind genetische, lerntheoretische und neurobiologische Faktoren zu diskutieren. Psychotherapeutische und medikamentöse Behandlungsmöglichkeiten werden referiert. Nach aktuellem Kenntnisstand stellen kognitiv-verhaltenstherapeutische Ansätze die Methode der Wahl dar. Metaanalysen zeigen einen positiven Effekt dieser Behandlungsansätze, wobei nicht eine Veränderung der devianten sexuellen Orientierung, sondern die Verhinderung weiterer sexueller Übergriffe das Behandlungsziel darstellt. Abschließend werden wichtige Aspekte des Risikomanagements bei Pädophilie ebenso wie zu beachtende Aspekte bei der forensisch-psychiatrischen Begutachtung dargestellt.

Schlüsselwörter

Sexualverhalten Paraphilien Sexuelle Abweichungen Kindesmissbrauch, sexuell Risikofaktoren 

Pedophilia

Etiology, diagnostics and therapy

Summary

Child sexual abuse is one of the most destructive events for healthy child development. Following psychiatric classification systems, pedophilia must be distinguished from child sexual abuse. Approximately only one half of all child abusers fulfill the diagnostic criteria for pedophilia which is defined as a persistent or dominating sexual preference for prepubescent children characterized by persistent thoughts, fantasies, urges, sexual arousal or behavior. This article describes the diagnostic criteria and potential differential diagnoses as well as epidemiological and etiological findings. From an etiological point of view multifactorial mechanisms are currently considered to be responsible especially genetic factors, learning theoretical and neurobiological factors. Psychotherapeutic and pharmaceutical treatment options will be discussed. According to the current state of knowledge cognitive-behavioral psychotherapy is the method of choice in the treatment of pedophilia and has demonstrated positive treatment effects in meta-analyses regarding relapse prevention. Medicinal treatment of pedophilia is only indicated for severe forms of pedophilia. Important aspects of risk management in the treatment of pedophilia and aspects which must be considered in the forensic psychiatric assessment are presented.

Keywords

Sexual behavior Paraphilias Sexual deviations Child abuse, sexual Risk factors 

Literatur

  1. 1.
    Bundeskriminalamt (2012) Polizeiliche Kriminalstatistik 2011. Bundeskriminalamt, WiesbadenGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Statistisches Bundesamt (2012) Lange Reihen Strafverfolgungsstatistik für Deutschland – Verurteilte nach ausgewählten Straftaten – 2011 – Stand: 30. November 2012. Statistisches Bundesamt, WiesbadenGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Blanchard R, Klassen P, Dickey R et al (2001) Sensitivity and specificity of the phallometric test for pedophilia in nonadmitting sex offenders. Psychol Assess 13:118–126PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Von Krafft-Ebbing R (1984) Psychopathia Sexualis. Matthes & Seitz, MünchenGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    World Health Organization (2000) Tenth revision of the International Classification of Diseases, Chapter V (F): mental and behavioural disorders. Diagnostic criteria for research. World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    American Psychiatric Association (2013) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5 (5th ed.). American Psychiatric Association, Arlington VAGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Blanchard R (2010) The DSM diagnostic criteria for pedophilia. Arch Sex Behav 39:304–316PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fiedler P (2004) Sexuelle Orientierung und sexuelle Abweichung: Heterosexualität – Homosexualität – Transgenderismus und Paraphilien – sexueller Missbrauch – sexuelle Gewalt. Beltz, WeinheimGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mendez M, Shapira JS (2011) Pedophilic behavior from brain disease. J Sex Med 8:1092–1100PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Müller JL, Fromberger P (2010) Bildgebende Befunde bei Sexualstraftätern. Forens Psychiatr Psychol Kriminol 4:3–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    O’Donohue W, Regev LG, Hagstrom A (2000) Problems with the DSM-IV diagnosis of pedophilia. Sex Abuse 12:95–105Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fromberger P, Stolpmann G, Jordan K et al (2009) Neurobiologische Forschung bei Pädophilie – Ergebnisse und deren Konsequenzen für die Diagnostik pädosexueller Straftäter. Z Neuropsychol 20:193–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kalmus E, Beech A (2005) Forensic assessment of sexual interest: a review. Aggress Violent Behav 10:193–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mokros A, Osterheider M, Nitschke J (2012) Pädophilie. Nervenarzt 83:355–358PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Seto MC (2008) Pedophilia and sexual offending against children: theory, assessment, and intervention. American Psychological Association, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Howes RJ (1995) A survey of plethysmographic assessment in North America. Sex Abuse 7:9–24Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Marshall WL, Fernandez YM (2000) Phallometric testing with sexual offenders: limits to its value. Clin Psychol Rev 20:807–822PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Thornton D, Laws DR (2009) Cognitive approaches to the assessment of sexual interest in sexual offenders. Wiley, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fromberger P, Jordan K, Steinkrauss H et al (2012) Eye movements in pedophiles: automatic and controlled attentional processes while viewing prepubescent stimuli. J Abnorm Psychol 122:587–599PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fromberger P, Jordan K, Steinkrauss H et al (2012) Diagnostic accuracy of eye movements in assessing pedophilia. J Sex Med 9:1868–1882PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ponseti J, Granert O, Jansen O et al (2012) Assessment of pedophilia using hemodynamic brain response to sexual stimuli. Arch Gen Psychiatry 69:187–194PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hall RC, Hall RC (2007) A profile of pedophilia: definition, characteristics of offenders, recidivism, treatment outcomes, and forensic issues. Mayo Clin Proc 82:457–471PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Raymond NC, Coleman E, Ohlerking F et al (1999) Psychiatric comorbidity in pedophilic sex offenders. Am J Psychiatry 156:786–788PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Simkins L, Ward W, Bowmann S et al (1990) Predicting treatment outcome for child sexual abusers. Ann Sex Res 3:21–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Knight RA, Prentky RA (1990) Classifying sexual offenders: the development and corroboration of taxonomic models. In: Marshall WLL, Laws DR, Barbaree HE (Hrsg) Handbook of sexual assault: issues, theories, and treatment of offender. Plenum Press, New York, S 23–54Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Beier K, Schäfer GA, Goecker D et al (2006) Präventionsprojekt Dunkelfeld. Der Berliner Ansatz zur therapeutischen Primärprävention von sexuellem Kindesmissbrauch. Humboldt-Spektrum 13:4–10Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ahlers CJ, Schaefer GA, Mundt IA et al (2011) How unusual are the contents of paraphilias? Paraphilia-associated sexual arousal patterns in a community-based sample of men. J Sex Med 8:1362–1370PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Alanko K, Salo B, Mokros A et al (2013) Evidence for heritability of adult men’s sexual interest in youth under age 16 from a population-based extended twin design. J Sex Med 10(4):1090–1099PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Gaffney G, Lurie SF, Berlin FS (1984) Is there familial transmission of pedophilia? J Nerv Ment Dis 172:546–548PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Laws D, Marshall WE (1990) A conditioning theory of the etiology and maintenance of deviant sexual preference and behavior. In: Marshall WL, Laws D, Barbaree HE (Hrsg) Handbook of sexual assault: issues, theories, and treatment of the offender. Plenum, New York, S 209–229Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    O’Donohue W, Plaud J (1994) The conditioning of human sexual arousal. Arch Sex Behav 23:321–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Jespersen AF, Lalumière ML, Seto MC (2009) Sexual abuse history among adult sex offenders and non-sex offenders: a meta-analysis. Child Abuse Negl 33:179–192PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Freund K, Kuban M (1994) The basis of the abused abuser theory of pedophilia: a further elaboration on an earlier study. Arch Sex Behav 23:553–563PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Wiebking C, Northoff G (2013) Neuroimaging in pedophilia. Curr Psychiatry Rep 15:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Schiffer B, Paul T, Gizewski E et al (2008) Functional brain correlates of heterosexual paedophilia. NeuroImage 41:80–91PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Fromberger P, Krippl M, Stolpmann G et al (2007) Neurobiologie der pädophilen Störung – eine methodenkritische Darstellung bisheriger Forschungsergebnisse. Forens Psychiatr Psychol Kriminol 1:249–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Joyal CC, Plante-Beaulieu J, De Chanterac A (2013) The neuropsychology of sexual offenders: a meta-analysis. Sex Abuse. DOI 10.1177/1079063213482842Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Ward T, Siegert RJ (2002) Toward a comprehensive theory of child abuse: a theory knitting perspective. Psychol Crime Law 9:319–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ward T, Beech A (2006) An integrated theory of sexual offending. Aggress Violent Behav 11:44–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Berner W, Briken P (2010) Therapieangebote für Männer mit sexuellen Präferenzstörungen und Sexualdelinquenz. Forens Psychiatr Psychol Kriminol 4:8–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Seifert D, Schiffer B, Leygraf N (2003) Plädoyer für die forensische Nachsorge. Psychiatr Prax 30:235–241PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Beier KM, Neutze J, Mundt IA et al (2009) Encouraging self-identified pedophiles and hebephiles to seek professional help: first results of the Prevention Project Dunkelfeld (PPD). Child Abuse Negl 33:545–549PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Schulz T, Hofter C, Struszczynski N et al (2014) Prävention sexuellen Missbrauchs (in Vorbereitung)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Berner W, Sexualforschung DGF, Nervenheilkunde DGFPPU (2007) Behandlungsleitlinie. Diagnose, Therapie und Prognose Störungen der sexuellen Präferenz. Steinkopff, DarmstadtGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Hanson RK (2009) A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of treatment for sexual offenders risk, need, and responsivity. Public Safety Canada, OttawaGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Lösel F, Schmucker M (2005) The effectiveness of treatment for sexual offenders: a comprehensive meta-analysis. J Exp Criminol 1:117–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Andrews DA, Bonta J (2010) The psychology of criminal conduct. Lexis Nexis/Anderson Pub, AlbanyGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Laws DR, Hudson SM, Ward T (2000) Remaking relapse prevention with sex offenders: a sourcebook. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Wischka B (2004) Behandlungsprogramm für Sexualstraftäter BPS. Kriminalpädagogischer Verlag, LingenGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Ward T, Stewart CA (2003) The treatment of sex offenders: risk management and good lives. Prof Psychol Res Pract 34:353–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Thibaut F, De La Barra F, Gordon H et al (2010) The World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) guidelines for the biological treatment of paraphilias. World J Biol Psychiatry 11:604–655PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Briken P, Kafka MP (2007) Pharmacological treatments for paraphilic patients and sexual offenders. Curr Opin Psychiatry 20:609–613PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Jordan K, Fromberger P, Stolpmann G et al (2011) The role of testosterone in sexuality and paraphilia – a neurobiological approach. Part II: testosterone and paraphilia. J Sex Med 8:3008–3029PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Beech AR, Fisher DD, Thornton D (2003) Risk assessment of sex offenders. Prof Psychol Res Pract 34:339–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Hanson KR, Bussière MT (1998) Predicting relapse: a meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies. J Consult Clin Psychol 66:348PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Hanson RK, Thornton D (2000) Improving risk assessment for sex offenders: a comparison of three actuarial scales. Law Hum Behav 24:119–136PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Boer D, Hart SD, Kropp PR et al (1997) Manual for the sexual violence risk-20: professional guidelines for assessing risk of sexual violence. Simon Fraser University, mental health, law, and policy institute, Burnaby, BCGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Hanson RK, Morton-Bourgon KE (2009) The accuracy of recidivism risk assessments for sexual offenders: a meta-analysis of 118 prediction studies. Psychol Assess 21:1–21PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Hanson RK, Harris AJR, Scott TL et al (2007) Assessing the risk of sexual offenders on community supervision: the dynamic supervision project (User Report 2007–05). Public Safety Canada, OttawaGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Nitschke J, Osterheider M, Mokros A (2011) Forensisch-psychiatrische Begutachtung bei Pädophilie. Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr 79:535–540PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Boetticher A, Nedopil N, Bosinski HA et al (2007) Mindestanforderungen für Schuldfähigkeitsgutachten*. Forens Psychiatr Psychol Kriminol 1:3–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Looman J, Gauthier C, Boer D (2001) Replication of the Massachusetts Ttreatment center child molester typology in a Canadian sample. J Interpers Violence 16:753–767CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Abteilung für Forensische Psychiatrie und PsychotherapieUniversitätsmedizin GöttingenGöttingenDeutschland

Personalised recommendations