Great cormorants (Phalacrocorax carbo) can detect auditory cues while diving
- 459 Downloads
In-air hearing in birds has been thoroughly investigated. Sound provides birds with auditory information for species and individual recognition from their complex vocalizations, as well as cues while foraging and for avoiding predators. Some 10% of existing species of birds obtain their food under the water surface. Whether some of these birds make use of acoustic cues while underwater is unknown. An interesting species in this respect is the great cormorant (Phalacrocorax carbo), being one of the most effective marine predators and relying on the aquatic environment for food year round. Here, its underwater hearing abilities were investigated using psychophysics, where the bird learned to detect the presence or absence of a tone while submerged. The greatest sensitivity was found at 2 kHz, with an underwater hearing threshold of 71 dB re 1 μPa rms. The great cormorant is better at hearing underwater than expected, and the hearing thresholds are comparable to seals and toothed whales in the frequency band 1–4 kHz. This opens up the possibility of cormorants and other aquatic birds having special adaptations for underwater hearing and making use of underwater acoustic cues from, e.g., conspecifics, their surroundings, as well as prey and predators.
KeywordsAquatic birds Psychophysics Sensory adaptation Threshold Underwater acoustics
We thank the many trainers and volunteers that have helped with the husbandry and training of the cormorants, especially L. Seidelin and S. Johansen. This work is funded by grants from the Danish Council for Independent Research | Natural Sciences, the Carlsberg Foundation, and a grant from the Swedish Environmental Protection Agency.
Conceptualization, K. A. H., O. N. L., AND M. W.; Methodology, K. A. H. and M. W.; Software, M. W.; Investigation, K. A. H.; Formal analysis, K. A. H., A.M., AND M. W.; Funding acquisition, M. W., O. N. L., and U. S.; Writing-original draft, K. A. H. and M. W.; Review and editing, A. M., O. N. L., and U. S.
- Crowell SC (2014) In-air and underwater hearing in ducks. Doctoral dissertation, University of MarylandGoogle Scholar
- Dooling RJ, Lohr B, Dent ML (2000a) Hearing in birds and reptiles comparative hearing: birds and reptiles. Springer, Berlin, pp 308–359Google Scholar
- Finney DJ (1971) Probit analysis, 3d edn. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Gescheider G (1997) Psychophysics: the fundamentals, 3rd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, MahwahGoogle Scholar
- Grémillet D, Chauvin CC, Wilson RP, Le Maho Y & Wanless S (2005) Unusual feather structure allows partial plumage wettability in diving great cormorants Phalacrocorax carbo. J Avian Biol 36:57–63Google Scholar
- Johansen S, Larsen ON, Christensen-Dalsgaard J, Seidelin L, Huulvej T, Jensen K, Lunneryd S-G, Boström M, Wahlberg M (2016) In-air and underwater hearing in the great cormorant (Phalacrocorax carbo sinensis) the effects of noise on aquatic life II. Springer, Berlin, pp 505–512Google Scholar
- Johnson CS (1967) Sound detection thresholds in marine mammals. Marine bio-acoustics 2:247–260Google Scholar
- Konishi M (1973) How the owl tracks its prey: experiments with trained barn owls reveal how their acute sense of hearing enables them to catch prey in the dark. Am Sci 61(4):414–424Google Scholar
- Marler PR & Slabbekoorn H (2004) Nature’s music: the science of birdsong. Academic Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
- Maxwell A, Hansen KA, Ortiz ST, Larsen ON, Siebert U & Wahlberg M (2017) In-air hearing of the great cormorant (Phalacrocorax carbo). Biology Open, bio. 023879Google Scholar
- Medwin H & Clay CS (1998) Fundamentals of Acoustical Oceanography. Academic Press, New York, p 24Google Scholar
- Popper A, Hawkins A (2011) The effects of noise on aquatic life (Vol. 730). Springer Science & Business Media, BerlinGoogle Scholar
- Popper AN, Hawkins A (2015) The effects of noise on aquatic life II (Vol. 875). Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
- Proakis JG, Manolakis DG (1996) Digital signal processing, 4th edn. Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
- Thewissen JG, Nummela S (2008) Sensory evolution on the threshold: adaptations in secondarily aquatic vertebrates. Univ of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
- White C, Butler PJ, Grémillet D, Martin GR (2008) Behavioural strategies of cormorants (Phalacrocoracidae) foraging under challenging light conditions. Ibis 150(s1):231–239Google Scholar