The Science of Nature

, 103:44 | Cite as

Enamel ultrastructure of fossil and modern pinnipeds: evaluating hypotheses of feeding adaptations in the extinct walrus Pelagiarctos

  • Carolina Loch
  • Robert W. Boessenecker
  • Morgan Churchill
  • Jules Kieser
Original Paper

Abstract

This study aimed to assess the enamel ultrastructure in modern otariid pinnipeds and in the extinct walrus Pelagiarctos. Teeth of the New Zealand fur seal (Arctocephalus forsteri), sea lion (Phocarctos hookeri), and fossil walrus Pelagiarctos thomasi were embedded, sectioned, etched, and analyzed via scanning electron microscopy. The enamel of NZ otariids and Pelagiarctos was prismatic and moderately thick, measuring 150–450 μm on average. It consisted of transversely oriented Hunter-Schreger bands (HSBs) from the enamel-dentine junction (EDJ) to near the outer surface, where it faded into prismless enamel less than 10 μm thick. The width of HSB was variable and averaged between 6 and 10 prisms, and they presented an undulating course both in longitudinal and cross sections. The overall organization of the enamel was similar in all teeth sampled; however, the enamel was thicker in canines and postcanines than in incisors. The crowns of all teeth sampled were uniformly covered by enamel; however, the grooved incisors lacked an enamel cover on the posterior side of the buccal face. Large tubules and tuft-like structures were seen at the EDJ. HSB enamel as well as tubules and tufts at the EDJ suggest increased occlusal loads during feeding, a biomechanical adaptation to avoid enamel cracking and failure. Despite overall simplification in tooth morphology and reduced mastication, the fossil and modern pinnipeds analyzed here retained the complex undulating HSB structure of other fossils and living Carnivora, while other marine mammals such as cetaceans developed simplified radial enamel.

Keywords

Pinnipedia Otariidae Odobenidae Enamel Ultrastructure Paleoecology 

References

  1. Armfield BA, Zheng Z, Bajpaj S, Vinyard CJ, Thewissen JGM (2013) Development and evolution of the unique cetacean dentition. PeerJ 1:e24CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Barnes LG (1977) Outline of eastern North Pacific fossil cetacean assemblages. Syst Zool 25:321–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barnes LG (1988) A new fossil pinniped (Mammalia: Otariidae) from the Middle Miocene Sharktooth Hill Bonebed, California. Contr Sci Mus Nat His Los Angeles 396:1–11Google Scholar
  4. Berta A (2002) Pinnipedia, overview. In: Perrin WF, Würsig B, Thewissen JGM (eds) Encyclopedia of marine mammals. Academic, San Diego, pp 903–911Google Scholar
  5. Berta A, Adam PJ (2001) Evolutionary biology of pinnipeds. In: Mazin J-M, de Buffrénil V (eds) Secondary adaptation of tetrapods to life in water. Verlag Dr. Friedrich Pfeil, München, pp 235–260Google Scholar
  6. Boessenecker RW (2011) New records of the fur seal Callorhinus (Carnivora: Otariidae) from the Plio-Pleistocene Rio Dell Formation of Northern California and comments on otariid dental evolution. J Vert Paleont 31:454–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boessenecker RW, Churchill M (2013) A reevaluation of the morphology, paleoecology, and phylogenetic relationships of the enigmatic walrus Pelagiarctos. PloS One 8(1):e54311CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Carlson SJ, Krause DW (1985) Enamel ultrastructure of multituberculate mammals: an investigation of variability. Michigan Univ Mus Paleo Cont 27(1):1–50Google Scholar
  9. Churchill M, Clementz MT (2015a) Functional implications of variation in tooth spacing and crown size in Pinnipedimorpha (Mammalia: Carnivora). Anat Rec 298(5):878–902CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Churchill M, Clementz MT (2015b) Was Enaliarctos (Carnivora: Pinnipedimorpha) a pierce feeder? Insights from tooth spacing and crown size. J Evolution Biol. doi: 10.1111/jeb.12783
  11. Churchill M, Boessenecker RW, Clementz MT (2014) Colonization of the southern hemisphere by fur seals and sea lions (Carnivora: Otariidae) revealed by combined evidence phylogenetic and Bayesian biogeographical analysis. Zoo J Linn Soc 172(1):200–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cobb WM (1933) The dentition of the walrus, Odobenus obesus. Proc Zool Soc Lond 103:645–668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Deméré TA, Berta A (2001) A reevaluation of Proneotherium repenningi from the Miocene Astoria Formation of Oregon and its position as a basal odobenid (Pinnipedia: Mammalia). J Vert Paleo 21(2):279–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Deméré TA, McGowen MR, Berta A, Gatesy J (2008) Morphological and molecular evidence for a stepwise evolutionary transition from teeth to baleen in mysticete whales. Syst Biol 57(1):15–37CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Drehmer CJ, Sanfelice D, Loch C (2015) Dental anomalies in pinnipeds (Carnivora: Otariidae and Phocidae): occurrence and evolutionary implications. Zoomorphology 134(2):325–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fordyce RE (1982) Dental anomaly in a fossil squalodont dolphin from New Zealand, and the evolution of polydonty in whales. NZ J Zool 9(4):419–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gatesy J, Geisler JH, Chang J, Buell C, Berta A, Meredith RW, Springer MS, McGowen MR (2013) A phylogenetic blueprint for a modern whale. Mol Phylogenet Evol 66(2):479–506CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Gingerich PD, Ul Haq M, Zalmout IS, Khan IH, Malkani MS (2001) Origin of whales from early artiodactyls: hands and feet of Eocene Protocetidae from Pakistan. Science 293:2239–2242CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Holwerda FM, Beatty BL, Schulp AS (2013) Dental macro-and microwear in Carinodens belgicus, a small mosasaur from the type Maastrichtian. Neth J Geosci 92(04):267–274Google Scholar
  20. Ishiyama M (1987) Enamel structure in odontocete whales. Scan Microsc 1:1071–1079Google Scholar
  21. Kohno N, Barnes LG, Hirota K (1995) Miocene fossil pinnipeds of the genera Prototaria and Neotherium (Carnivora; Otariidae; Imagotariinae) in the North Pacific Ocean: evolution, relationships and distribution. Isl Arc 3(4):285–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Loch C, Duncan W, Simões-Lopes PC, Kieser JA, Fordyce RE (2013) Ultrastructure of enamel and dentine in extant dolphins (Cetacea: Delphinoidea and Inioidea). Zoomorphology 132:215–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Loch C, Kieser JA, Fordyce RE (2015) Enamel ultrastructure in fossil cetaceans (Cetacea: Archaeoceti and Odontoceti). PLoS One 10(1):e0116557CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Maas MC, Dumont ER (1999) Built to last: the structure, function, and evolution of primate dental enamel. Evol Anthropol 8:133–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Maas MC, Thewissen JGM (1995) Enamel microstructure of Pakicetus (Mammalia: Archaeoceti). J Paleontol 69:1154–1163Google Scholar
  26. Marshall CD, Rosen DAS, Trites AW (2015) Feeding kinematics and performance of basal otariid pinnipeds, Steller sea lions and northern fur seals: implications for the evolution of mammalian feeding. J Exp Biol 218:3229–3240CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. McGraw WS, Pampush JD, Daegling DJ (2012) Brief communication: enamel thickness and durophagy in mangabeys revisited. Am J Phy Anthropol 147:326–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mitchell ED (1965) History of research at Sharktooth Hill, Kern County, California. Kern Co Hist Soc Spec Paper 1:1–45Google Scholar
  29. Pauly D, Trites AW, Capuli E, Christensen V (1998) Diet composition and trophic levels of marine mammals. ICES J Mar Sci 55:467–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Prothero DR, Liter MR, Barnes LG, Wang X, Mitchell ED, McLeod SA, Whistler DP, Tedford RH, Ray CE (2008) Land mammals from the Middle Miocene Sharktooth Hill Bonebed, Kern County, California. New Mexico Mus Nat Hist Sci Bull 44:299–314Google Scholar
  31. Pyenson ND, Irmis RB, Lipps JH, Barnes LG, Mitchell ED, McLeod SA (2009) Origin of a widespread marine bonebed deposited during the Middle Miocene Climatic Optimum. Geology 37:519–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sahni A, Von Koenigswald W (1997) The enamel structure of some fossil and recent whales from the Indian subcontinent. In: Von Koenigswald W, Sander PM (eds) Tooth enamel microstructure. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 177–191Google Scholar
  33. Stefen C (1999) Enamel microstructure of recent and fossil Canidae (Carnivora: Mammalia). J Vert Paleontol 19:576–587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Stefen C (2001) Enamel structure of arctoid Carnivora: Amphicyonidae, Ursidae, Procyonidae, and Mustelidae. J Mammal 82(2):450–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Stefen C, Rensberger JM (1999) The specialized structure of hyaenid enamel: description and development within the lineage—including percrocutids. Scan Microsc 13:363–380Google Scholar
  36. Von Koenigswald W (1997) Evolutionary trends in the differentiation of mammalian enamel ultrastructure. In: Von Koenigswald W, Sander PM (eds) Tooth enamel microstructure. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 203–235Google Scholar
  37. Von Koenigswald W (2000) Two different strategies in enamel differentiation: Marsupialia versus Eutheria. In: Teaford MF, Smith MM, Ferguson MW (eds) Development, function and evolution of teeth. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 107–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Von Koenigswald W, Clemens W (1992) Levels of complexity in the microstructure of mammalian enamel and their application in studies of systematics. Scan Microsc 6:195–218Google Scholar
  39. Werth AJ (2000) Feeding in marine mammals. In: Schwenk K (ed) Feeding: form, function and evolution in tetrapod vertebrates. Academic, San Diego, pp 487–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Werth AJ (2006) Mandibular and dental variation and the evolution of suction feeding in Odontoceti. J Mammal 87(3):579–588CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carolina Loch
    • 1
  • Robert W. Boessenecker
    • 2
    • 3
  • Morgan Churchill
    • 4
  • Jules Kieser
    • 1
  1. 1.Sir John Walsh Research Institute, Faculty of DentistryUniversity of OtagoDunedinNew Zealand
  2. 2.Department of Geology and Environmental GeosciencesCollege of CharlestonCharlestonUSA
  3. 3.University of California Museum of PaleontologyUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeleyUSA
  4. 4.Department of AnatomyNew York Institute of Technology College of Osteopathic MedicineNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations