Ant workers exhibit specialization and memory during raft formation
- 755 Downloads
By working together, social insects achieve tasks that are beyond the reach of single individuals. A striking example of collective behaviour is self-assembly, a process in which individuals link their bodies together to form structures such as chains, ladders, walls or rafts. To get insight into how individual behavioural variation affects the formation of self-assemblages, we investigated the presence of task specialization and the role of past experience in the construction of ant rafts. We subjected groups of Formica selysi workers to two consecutive floods and monitored the position of individuals in rafts. Workers showed specialization in their positions when rafting, with the same individuals consistently occupying the top, middle, base or side position in the raft. The presence of brood modified workers’ position and raft shape. Surprisingly, workers’ experience in the first rafting trial with brood influenced their behaviour and raft shape in the subsequent trial without brood. Overall, this study sheds light on the importance of workers’ specialization and memory in the formation of self-assemblages.
KeywordsSelf-assemblage Collective behaviour Task specialization Rafting Ants Formicinae
We thank Magalie Dialundama for her assistance in the lab, Emilie Lefoulon for the illustration of the ant raft, and Christoph Grüter, Adam L. Cronin and anonymous reviewers for comments on the manuscript. This project was funded by Swiss National Science Foundation grant 31003A-146641.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Adams BJ, Hooper-Bùi LM, Strecker RM, O’Brien DM (2011) Raft formation by the red imported fire ant, Solenopsis invicta. J Insect Sci 11Google Scholar
- Camazine S, Deneubourg JL, Franks N, Sneyd J, Théraulaz G, Bonabeau E (2001) Self-organization in biological systems. In: Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
- Dejean A, Leroy C, Corbara C, Roux O, Céréghino R, Orivel J, Boulay R (2010) Arboreal ants use the “Velcro® Principle” to capture very large prey. PloS One 5. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011331.g001
- Ferguson-Gow H, Sumner S, Bourke AF, Jones KE (2014) Colony size predicts division of labour in attine ants. Proc Biol Sci 281. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2014.1411
- Ferrante E, Turgut AE, Duéñez-Guzmán E, Dorigo M, Wenseleers T (2015) Evolution of self-organized task specialization in robot swarms. PLoS Comput Biol 11. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004273
- Franks NR (1985) Reproduction, foraging efficiency and worker polymorphism in army ants. Fortschr Zool 31:91–107Google Scholar
- Holbrook CT, Fewell JH, Kukuk PF (2013) Increased group size promotes task specialization in a normally solitary halictine bee. Behaviour 1–18 doi: 10.1163/1568539x-00003104
- Liang SH, Lin WY, Lin YC, Chen YC, Shieh BS (2010) Variations in the pit size of Cueta sauteri (Neuroptera: Myrmeleontidae) larvae in response to past pit-building experience and food limitation. Zool Stud 49:102–107Google Scholar
- Mailleux A-C, Deneubourg J-L, Detrain C (2003) How does colony growth influence communication in ants? Insect Soc 50:24–31.Google Scholar
- Oster GF, Wilson EO (1978) Caste and ecology in the social insects. Monographs in population biology, vol 12. Princeton University Press, Princeton NJGoogle Scholar
- R Development Core Team (2015) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
- Seifert B (2002) A taxonomic revision of the Formica cinerea group (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Abh Ber Naturkundemuseum Görlitz 74:245–272Google Scholar