Juvenile morphology: A clue to the origins of the most mysterious of mysticetes?
- 333 Downloads
The origin of the pygmy right whale (Caperea marginata) has long been one of the most vexing conundrums of marine mammal evolution. The extremely disparate skeletal structure of Caperea and a patchy fossil record have left morphology and molecules at odds: whereas most morphological analyses ally Caperea with right whales (Balaenidae), most molecular studies instead suggest a close relationship with rorquals (Balaenopteridae) and grey whales (Eschrichtiidae). The morphological evidence supporting a Caperea-balaenid clade consists of several shared features of the skull and mandible, as traditionally observed in adult individuals. Here, we show that at least two of these features, the ascending process of the maxilla and the coronoid process, arise from substantially different precursors early during ontogeny and therefore likely do not represent genuine synapomorphies. Both of these juvenile morphologies have adult counterparts in the fossil record, thus indicating that the ontogenetic variation in the living species may be a genuine reflection of differing ancestral states. This new evidence contradicts previous morphological hypotheses on the origins of Caperea and may help to reconcile morphological and molecular evidence.
KeywordsCetacea Mysticeti Baleen whale Caperea Pygmy right whale Evolution
- Boessenecker RW (2011) Herpetocetine (Cetacea: Mysticeti) dentaries from the Upper Miocene Santa Margarita Sandstone of Central California. PaleoBios 30:1–12Google Scholar
- Buono MR, Dozo MT, Marx FG, Fordyce RE (2012) A new fossil mandible from the Late Miocene of Argentina sheds light on the deep-time origins of the enigmatic pygmy right whale. Acta Palaeontol Pol, accepted with minor revisionsGoogle Scholar
- Cabrera A (1926) Cetáceos fósiles del Museo de La Plata. Rev Mus La Plata 29:363–411Google Scholar
- Graf J, Jacobs L, Polcyn M, Mateus O, Schulp A (2011) New fossil whales from Angola. J Vert Paleontol Abstracts 2011:119Google Scholar