, Volume 99, Issue 12, pp 1031–1038 | Cite as

Vulnerability and behavioral response to ultraviolet radiation in the components of a foliar mite prey–predator system

Original Paper


Ambient ultraviolet-B (UVB) radiation impacts plant-dwelling arthropods including herbivorous and predatory mites. However, the effects of UVB on prey–predator systems, such as that between the herbivorous spider mite and predatory phytoseiid mite, are poorly understood. A comparative study was conducted to determine the vulnerability and behavioral responses of these mites to ultraviolet (UV) radiation. First, we analyzed dose–response (cumulative irradiance-mortality) curves for the eggs of phytoseiid mites (Neoseiulus californicus, Neoseiulus womersleyi, and Phytoseiulus persimilis) and the spider mite (Tetranychus urticae) to UVB radiation from a UV lamp. This indicated that the phytoseiid mites were more vulnerable than the spider mite, although P. persimilis was slightly more tolerant than the other two phytoseiid mites. Second, we compared the avoidance behavior of adult female N. californicus and two spider mite species (T. urticae, a lower leaf surface user; Panonychus citri, an upper leaf surface user) in response to solar UV and visible light. N. californicus actively avoided both types of radiation, whereas P. citri showed only minimal avoidance behavior. T. urticae actively avoided UV as well as N. californicus but exhibited a slow response to visible light as well as P. citri. Such variation in vulnerability and avoidance behavior accounts for differences in the species adaptations to solar UVB radiation. This may be the primary factor determining habitat use among these mites on host plant leaves, subsequently affecting accessibility by predators and also intraguild competition.


Solar UV radiation Tetranychus urticae Panonychus citri Neoseiulus californicus Neoseiulus womersleye 



We thank Dr. N. Hinomoto who provided phytoseiid mites and Dr. H. Kishimoto who collected P. citri. This study was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan (22380036).


  1. Auger P, Tixier MS, Kreiter S, Fauvel G (1999) Factors affecting ambulatory dispersal in the predaceous mite Neoseiulus californicus (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Exp Appl Acarol 23:235–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ballaré CL, Caldwell MM, Flint SD, Robinson SA, Bornman JF (2011) Effects of solar ultraviolet radiation on terrestrial ecosystems. Patterns, mechanisms, and interactions with climate change. Photoch Photobio Sci 10:226–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barcelo JA (1981) Photoeffects of visible and ultraviolet radiation on the two-spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae. Photochem Photobiol 33:703–706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bounfour M, Tanigoshi LK (2001) Effect of temperature on development and demographic parameters of Tetranychus urticae and Eotetranychus carpini borealis (Acari: Tetranychidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 94:400–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boyne JV, Hain FP (1983) Effects of constant temperature, relative humidity, and simulated rainfall on development and survival of the spruce spider mite (Oligonychus ununguis). Can Ent 115:93–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ferro DN, Chapman RB (1979) Effects of different constant humidities and temperatures on twospotted spider mite egg hatch. Environ Entomol 8:701–705Google Scholar
  7. Foott WH (1963) Competition between two species of mites. II. Factors influencing intensity. Can Entomol 95:45–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fukaya M, Uesugi R, Ohashi H, Sakai Y, Sudo M, Kasai A, Kishimoto H, Osakabe M (2012) Tolerance to solar ultraviolet-B radiation in the citrus red mite, an upper surface user of host plant leaves. Photochem Photobiol. doi: 10.1111/php.12001
  9. Furuichi H, Yano S, Takafuji A, Osakabe M (2005) Prey preference of the predatory mite Neoseiulus womersleyi Schicha is determined by spider mite webs. J Appl Entomol 129:336–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hoy MA, Smilanick JM (1981) Non-random prey location by the phytoseiid predator Metaseiulus occidentalis: differential responses to several spider mite species. Enomol Exp Appl 29:241–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jones VP, Parrella MP (1984) Intratree regression sampling plans for the citrus red mite (Acari: Tetranychidae) on lemons in southern California. J Econ Entomol 77:810–813Google Scholar
  12. Karabourniotis G, Kyparissis A, Manetas Y (1993) Leaf hairs of Olea europaea protect underlying tissues against ultraviolet-B radiation damage. Environ Exp Bot 33:341–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Li J, Margolies DC (1991) Factors affecting location of Banks grass mite, Oligonychus pratensis (Acari: Tetranychidae), on corn leaves. Exp Appl Acarol 12:27–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Liakoura V, Stefanou M, Manetas Y, Cholevas C, Karabourniotis G (1997) Trichome density and its UV-B protective potential are affected by shading and leaf position on the canopy. Environ Exp Bot 38:223–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. McEnroe WD (1966) Color vision in the adult female two-spotted spider mite. Science 154:782–784PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. McEnroe WD (1969) Eyes of the female two-spotted spider mite. Tetranychus urticae. I. Morphology. Ann Entomol Soc Am 62:461–466Google Scholar
  17. McEnroe WD, Dronka K (1969) Eyes of the female two-spotted spider mite. Tetranychus urticae. II. Behavioral analysis of the photoreceptors. Ann Entomol Soc Am 62:466–469Google Scholar
  18. McMurtry JA, Croft BA (1997) Life-styles of phytoseiid mites and their roles in biological control. Annu Rev Entomol 62:291–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. McMurtry JA, Scriven GT (1964) Studies on the feeding, reproduction, and development of Amblyseius hibisci (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) on various food substances. Ann Entomol Soc Am 57:649–655Google Scholar
  20. Mori H (1961) Comparative studies of thermal reaction in four species of spider mites (Acarina Tetranychidae). J Fac Agric Hokkaido Univ 51:574–591Google Scholar
  21. Morimoto K, Furuichi H, Yano S, Osakabe M (2006) Web mediated interspecific competition among spider mites. J Econ Entomol 99:678–684PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Naegele JA, McEnroe WD, Soans AB (1966) Spectral sensitivity and orientation response of the two-spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae Koch, from 350 to 700 mμ. J Insect Physiol 12:1187–1195PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ohtsuka K, Osakabe M (2009) Deleterious effects of UV-B radiation on herbivorous spider mites: they can avoid it by remaining on lower leaf surfaces. Environ Entomol 38:920–929PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Onzo A, Hanna R, Zannou I, Sabelis MW, Yaninek JS (2003) Dynamics of refuge use: diurnal, vertical migration by predatory and herbivorous mites within cassava plants. Oikos 101:59–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Onzo A, Hanna R, Sabelis MW (2009) Within-plant migration of the predatory mite Typhlodromalus aripo from the apex to the leaves of cassava: response to day–night cycle, prey location and prey density. J Insect Behav 22:186–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Onzo A, Sabelis MW, Hanna R (2010) Effects of ultraviolet radiation on predatory mites and the role of refuges in plant structures. Environ Entomol 39:695–701PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Osakabe M (1988) Relationships between food substances and developmental success in Amblyseius sojaensis Ehara (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Appl Entomol Zool 23:45–51Google Scholar
  28. Osakabe M, Inoue K, Ashihara W (1987) Effect of Amblyseius sojaensis Ehara (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) as a predator of Panonychus citri (McGregor) and Tetranychus kanzawai Kishida (Acarina: Tetranychidae). Appl Entomol Zool 22:594–599Google Scholar
  29. Osakabe M, Hongo K, Funayama K, Osumi S (2006) Amensalism via webs causes unidirectional shifts of dominance in spider mite communities. Oecologia 150:496–505PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Palevsky E, Walzer A, Gal S, Schausberger P (2008) Evaluation of dry-adapted strains of the predatory mite Neoseiulus californicus for spider mite control on cucumber, strawberry and pepper. Exp Appl Acarol 45:15–27PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. R Development Core Team (2009) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, Version 2.10.1. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar
  32. Rowles AD, O’Dowd DJ (2009) Leaf domatia and protection of a predatory mite Typhlodromus doreenae Schicha (Acari: Phytoseiidae) from drying humidity. Aust J Entomol 48:276–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sabelis MW, Bakker FM (1992) How predatory mites cope with the web of their tetranychid prey: a functional view on dorsal chaetotaxy in the Phytoseiidae. Exp Appl Acarol 16:203–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sakai Y, Osakabe M (2010) Spectrum-specific damage and solar ultraviolet radiation avoidance in the two-spotted spider mite. Photochem Photobiol 86:925–932PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sakai Y, Sudo M, Osakabe M (2012a) Seasonal changes in the deleterious effects of solar ultraviolet-B radiation on eggs of the twospotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae). Appl Entomol Zool 47:67–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sakai Y, Sudo M, Osakabe M (2012b) A comparison of the effects of gravity and the nutritional advantage of leaf surfaces on fecundity in the two-spotted spider mite (Acari: Tetranychidae). J Acarol Soc Jpn 21:1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schausberger P (1998) The influence of relative humidity on egg hatch in Euseius finlandicus, Typhlodromus pyri and Kampimodromus aberrans (Acari, Phytoseiidae). J Appl Entomol 122:497–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Semerdjieva SI, Phoenix GK, Hares D, Gwynn-Jones D, Callaghan TV, Sheffield E (2003) Surface morphology, leaf and cuticle thickness of four dwarf shrubs from a sub-Arctic heath following long-term exposure to enhanced levels of UV-B. Physiol Plant 117:289–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Shinmen T, Yano S, Osakabe M (2010) The predatory mite Neoseulus womersleyi (Acari: Phytoseiidae) follows extracts of trails left by the two-spotted spider mite Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae). Exp Appl Acarol 52:111–118PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Shipp JL, Ward KI, Gillespie TJ (1996) Influence of temperature and vapor pressure deficit on the rate of predation by the predatory mite, Amblyseius cucumeris, on Frankliniella occidentalis. Entomol Exp Appl 78:31–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Skaltsa H, Verykokidou E, Harvala C, Karabourniotis G, Manetas Y (1994) UV-B protective potential and flavonoid content of leaf hairs of Quercus ilex. Phytochemistry 37:987–990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sudo M, Osakabe M (2011) Do plant mites commonly prefer the underside of leaves? Exp Appl Acarol 55:25–38PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Suzuki T, Watanabe M, Takeda M (2009) UV tolerance in the two-spotted spider mite. J Insect Physiol 55:649–654PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Veerman A (2001) Photoperiodic time measurement in insects and mites: a critical evaluation of the oscillator-clock hypothesis. J Insect Physiol 47:1097–1109PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Veerman A, Overmeer WPJ, van Zon AQ, de Boer JM, de Waard ER, Huisman HO (1983) Vitamin A is essential for photoperiodic induction of diapause in an eyeless mite. Nature 302:248–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Villanueva RT, Childers CC (2005) Diurnal and spatial patterns of Phytoseiidae in the citrus canopy. Exp Appl Acarol 35:269–280PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Walter DE (1996) Living on leaves: mites, tomenta, and leaf domatia. Annu Rev Entomol 41:101–114PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Weintraub PG, Kleitman S, Alchanatis V, Palevsky E (2007) Factors affecting the distribution of a predatory mite on greenhouse sweet pepper. Exp Appl Acarol 42:23–35PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Yano S, Osakabe M (2009) Do spider mite-infested plants and spider mite trails attract predatory mites? Ecol Res 24:1173–1178CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratory of Ecological Information, Graduate School of AgricultureKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan

Personalised recommendations