, Volume 98, Issue 12, pp 1049–1056 | Cite as

Effects of early developmental conditions on innate immunity are only evident under favourable adult conditions in zebra finches

  • Greet De Coster
  • Simon Verhulst
  • Egbert Koetsier
  • Liesbeth De Neve
  • Michael Briga
  • Luc Lens
Original Paper


Long-term effects of unfavourable conditions during development can be expected to depend on the quality of the environment experienced by the same individuals during adulthood. Yet, in the majority of studies, long-term effects of early developmental conditions have been assessed under favourable adult conditions only. The immune system might be particularly vulnerable to early environmental conditions as its development, maintenance and use are thought to be energetically costly. Here, we studied the interactive effects of favourable and unfavourable conditions during nestling and adult stages on innate immunity (lysis and agglutination scores) of captive male and female zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata). Nestling environmental conditions were manipulated by a brood size experiment, while a foraging cost treatment was imposed on the same individuals during adulthood. This combined treatment showed that innate immunity of adult zebra finches is affected by their early developmental conditions and varies between both sexes. Lysis scores, but not agglutination scores, were higher in individuals raised in small broods and in males. However, these effects were only present in birds that experienced low foraging costs. This study shows that the quality of the adult environment may shape the long-term consequences of early developmental conditions on innate immunity, as long-term effects of nestling environment were only evident under favourable adult conditions.


Brood size manipulation Complement Developmental stress Foraging costs manipulation Immunocompetence Natural antibodies 



We thank M. Kouwen, F. Tamminga and M. Salomons for assistance in building and developing the design for the foraging costs experiment, E. Mulder for help with the haemolysis–haemagglutination assay and W. Müller and three anonymous reviewers for valuable comments on an earlier version of the manuscript. The experiments were performed in accordance to the ethical guidelines of the Animal Experimentation Committee of the University of Groningen (licence number 5150). G.D.C. was supported by a doctoral grant and by FWO research community WO.037.10N from the Research Foundation Flanders (FWO). E.K. and S.V. were supported by a Vici-grant to S.V from The Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO).


  1. Alonso-Alvarez C, Bertrand S, Devevey G, Prost J, Faivre B, Chastel O, Sorci G (2006) An experimental manipulation of life-history trajectories and resistance to oxidative stress. Evolution 60:1913–1924. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2006.tb00534.x PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Arnold KE, Blount JD, Metcalfe NB, Orr KJ, Adam A, Houston D, Monaghan P (2007) Sex-specific differences in compensation for poor neonatal nutrition in the zebra finch Taeniopygia guttata. J Avian Biol 38:356–366. doi: 10.1111/j.2007.0908-8857.03818.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bandeira A, Coutinho A, Martinez C, Pereira P (1988) The origin of “natural antibodies” and the internal activity in the immune system. Int Rev Immunol 3:47–58. doi: doi:10.3109/08830188809051181 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boes M (2000) Role of natural and immune IgM antibodies in immune responses. Mol Immunol 37:1141–1149PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boonekamp JJ, Ros AHF, Verhulst S (2008) Immune activation suppresses plasma testosterone level: a meta-analysis. Biol Lett 4:741–744. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2008.0347 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bourgeon S, Kauffmann M, Geiger S, Raclot T, Robin J-P (2010) Relationships between metabolic status, corticosterone secretion and maintenance of innate and adaptive humoral immunities in fasted re-fed mallards. J Exp Biol 213:3810–3818. doi: 10.1242/jeb.045484 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bradbury RR, Blakey JK (1998) Diet, maternal condition, and offspring sex ratio the zebra finch, Poephila guttata. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 265:895–899. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1998.0375 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Buehler DM, Encinas-Viso F, Petit M, Vezina F, Tieleman BI, Piersma T (2009a) Limited access to food and physiological trade-offs in a long-distance migrant shorebird. II. Constitutive immune function and the acute-phase response. Physiol Biochem Zool 82:561–571. doi: 10.1086/603635 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Buehler DM, Tieleman BI, Piersma T (2009b) Age and environment affect constitutive immune function in red knots (Calidris canutus). J Ornithol 150:815–825. doi: 10.1007/s10336-009-0402-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Butler MW, McGraw KJ (2011) Past or present? Relative contributions of developmental and adult conditions to adult immune function and coloration in mallard ducks (Anas platyrhynchos). J Comp Physiol B 181:551–563. doi: 10.1007/s00360-010-0529-z PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. De Coster G, De Neve L, Martín-Gálvez D, Therry L, Lens L (2010) Variation in innate immunity in relation to ectoparasite load, age and season: a field experiment in great tits (Parus major). J Exp Biol 213:3012–3018. doi: 10.1242/jeb.042721 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. de Kogel CH (1997a) Does brood size manipulation affect later competitive behaviour of offspring? Behaviour 134:161–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. de Kogel CH (1997b) Long-term effects of brood size manipulation on morphological development and sex-specific mortality of offspring. J Anim Ecol 66:167–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dugdale HL, Nouvellet P, Pope LC, Burke T, Macdonald DW (2010) Fitness measures in selection analyses: sensitivity to the overall number of offspring produced in a lifetime. J Evol Biol 23:282–292. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01896.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fargallo JA, Laaksonen T, Poyri V, Korpimaki E (2002) Inter-sexual differences in the immune response of Eurasian kestrel nestlings under food shortage. Ecol Lett 5:95–101. doi: 10.1046/j.1461-0248.2002.00290.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fargallo JA, Martinez-Padilla J, Toledano-Diaz A, Santiago-Moreno J, Davila JA (2007) Sex and testosterone effects on growth, immunity and melanin coloration of nestling Eurasian kestrels. J Anim Ecol 76:201–209. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2006.01193.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Folstad I, Karter AJ (1992) Parasites, bright males, and the immunocompetence handicap. Am Nat 139:603–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gil D, Bulmer E, Celis P, Puerta M (2008) Increased sibling competition does not increase testosterone or corticosterone levels in nestlings of the spotless starling (Sturnus unicolor). Horm Behav 54:238–243. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2007.11.013 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gluckman PD, Hanson MA (2004) Living with the past: evolution, development, and patterns of disease. Science 305:1733–1736. doi: 10.1126/science.1095292 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Grafen A (1988) On the uses of data on lifetime reproductive success. In: Clutton-Brock T (ed) Reproductive success. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 454–471Google Scholar
  21. Griffith SC, Buchanan KL (2010) Maternal effects in the zebra finch: a model mother reviewed. Emu 110:251–267. doi: 10.1071/mu10006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hendrickx F, Maelfait JP, Lens L (2003) Relationship between fluctuating asymmetry and fitness within and between stressed and unstressed populations of the wolf spider Pirata piraticus. J Evol Biol 16:1270–1279. doi: 10.1046/j.1420-9101.2003.00633.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hõrak P, Tegelmann L, Ots I, Møller AP (1999) Immune function and survival of great tit nestlings in relation to growth conditions. Oecologia 121:316–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kenward MG, Roger JH (1997) Small sample inference for fixed effects from restricted maximum likelihood. Biometrics 53:983–997PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kilner R (1998) Primary and secondary sex ratio manipulation by zebra finches. Anim Behav 56:155–164. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1998.0775 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Klasing KC (2004) The costs of immunity. Acta Zool Sin 50:961–969Google Scholar
  27. Koetsier E, Verhulst S (2011) A simple technique to manipulate foraging costs in seed-eating birds. J Exp Biol 214:1225–1229. doi: 10.1242/jeb.050336 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lee KA, Wikelski M, Robinson WD, Robinson TR, Klasing KC (2008) Constitutive immune defences correlate with life-history variables in tropical birds. J Anim Ecol 77:356–363. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2007.01347.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lens L, Van Dongen S, Matthysen E (2002) Fluctuating asymmetry as an early warning system in the critically endangered Taita thrush. Conserv Biol 16:479–487. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.00516.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lindström J (1999) Early development and fitness in birds and mammals. Trends Ecol Evol 14:343–348. doi: 10.1016/S0169-5347(99)01639-0 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lochmiller RL, Deerenberg C (2000) Trade-offs in evolutionary immunology: just what is the cost of immunity? Oikos 88:87–98. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2000.880110.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Love OP, Salvante KG, Dale J, Williams TD (2008) Sex-specific variability in the immune system across life-history stages. Am Nat 172:E99–E112. doi: 10.1086/589521 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lummaa V, Clutton-Brock T (2002) Early development, survival and reproduction in humans. Trends Ecol Evol 17:141–147. doi: 10.1016/S0169-5347(01)02414-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Martins TLF (2004) Sex-specific growth rates in zebra finch nestlings: a possible mechanism for sex ratio adjustment. Behav Ecol 15:174–180. doi: 10.1093/beheco/arg094 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Matson KD, Ricklefs RE, Klasing KC (2005) A hemolysis-hemagglutination assay for characterizing constitutive innate humoral immunity in wild and domestic birds. Dev Comp Immunol 29:275–286. doi: 10.1016/j.dci.2004.07.006 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mauck RA, Matson KD, Philipsborn J, Ricklefs RE (2005) Increase in the constitutive innate humoral immune system in Leach’s storm-petrel (Oceanodroma leucorhoa) chicks is negatively correlated with growth rate. Funct Ecol 19:1001–1007. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2005.01060.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. McGraw KJ, Ardia DR (2005) Sex differences in carotenoid status and immune performance in zebra finches. Evol Ecol Res 7:251–262Google Scholar
  38. Mendes L, Piersma T, Hasselquist D, Matson KD, Ricklefs RE (2006) Variation in the innate and acquired arms of the immune system among five shorebird species. J Exp Biol 209:284–291. doi: 10.1242/jeb.02015 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Metcalfe NB, Monaghan P (2001) Compensation for a bad start: grow now, pay later? Trends Ecol Evol 16:254–260. doi: 10.1016/S0169-5347(01)02124-3 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Møller AP, Haussy C (2007) Fitness consequences of variation in natural antibodies and complement in the barn swallow Hirundo rustica. Funct Ecol 21:363–371. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2006.01215.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Møller AP, Saino N (2004) Immune response and survival. Oikos 104:299–304. doi: 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2004.12844.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Monaghan P (2008) Early growth conditions, phenotypic development and environmental change. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 363:1635–1645. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2007.0011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Naguib M, Nemitz A (2007) Living with the past: nutritional stress in juvenile males has immediate effects on their plumage ornaments and on adult attractiveness in zebra finches. PLoS One 2:5. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000901 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Naguib M, Riebel K, Marzal A, Gil D (2004) Nestling immunocompetence and testosterone covary with brood size in a songbird. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 271:833–838. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2673 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Norris K, Evans MR (2000) Ecological immunology: life history trade-offs and immune defense in birds. Behav Ecol 11:19–26. doi: 10.1093/beheco/11.1.19 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ochsenbein AF, Zinkernagel RM (2000) Natural antibodies and complement link innate and acquired immunity. Immunol Today 21:624–630. doi: 10.1016/S0167-5699(00)01754-0 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Parejo D, Silva N, Aviles JM (2007) Within-brood size differences affect innate and acquired immunity in roller Coracias garrulus nestlings. J Avian Biol 38:717–725. doi: 10.1111/j.2007.0908-8857.04081.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Roberts ML, Buchanan KL, Evans MR (2004) Testing the immunocompetence handicap hypothesis: a review of the evidence. Anim Behav 68:227–239. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.05.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Saino N, Calza S, Møller AP (1997) Immunocompetence of nestling barn swallows in relation to brood size and parental effort. J Anim Ecol 66:827–836CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Saino N, Suffritti C, Martinelli R, Rubolini D, Møller AP (2003) Immune response covaries with corticosterone plasma levels under experimentally stressful conditions in nestling barn swallows (Hirundo rustica). Behav Ecol 14:318–325. doi: 10.1093/beheco/14.3.318 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sheldon BC, Verhulst S (1996) Ecological immunology: costly parasite defences and trade-offs in evolutionary ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 11:317–321PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Soler JJ, Martin-Vivaldi M, Haussy C, Møller AP (2007) Intra- and interspecific relationships between nest size and immunity. Behav Ecol 18:781–791. doi: 10.1093/beheco/arm045 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Stier KS, Almasi B, Gasparini J, Piault R, Roulin A, Jenni L (2009) Effects of corticosterone on innate and humoral immune functions and oxidative stress in barn owl nestlings. J Exp Biol 212:2084–2090. doi: 10.1242/jeb.024406 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Talloen W, Lens L, Van Dongen S, Adriaensen F, Matthysen E (2010) Mild stress during development affects the phenotype of great tit Parus major nestlings: a challenge experiment. Biol J Linn Soc 100:103–110. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2010.01422.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Tschirren B, Rutstein AN, Postma E, Mariette M, Griffith SC (2009) Short- and long-term consequences of early developmental conditions: a case study on wild and domesticated zebra finches. J Evol Biol 22:387–395. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2008.01656.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Verhulst S, Holveck MJ, Riebel K (2006) Long-term effects of manipulated natal brood size on metabolic rate in zebra finches. Biol Lett 2:478–480. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2006.0496 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wiersma P, Verhulst S (2005) Effects of intake rate on energy expenditure, somatic repair and reproduction of zebra finches. J Exp Biol 208:4091–4098. doi: 10.1242/jeb.01854 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wiersma P, Salomons HM, Verhulst S (2005) Metabolic adjustments to increasing foraging costs of starlings in a closed economy. J Exp Biol 208:4099–4108. doi: 10.1242/jeb.01855 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Zann RA (1996) The zebra finch: a synthesis of field and laboratory studies. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Greet De Coster
    • 1
  • Simon Verhulst
    • 2
  • Egbert Koetsier
    • 2
  • Liesbeth De Neve
    • 1
  • Michael Briga
    • 2
  • Luc Lens
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biology, Terrestrial Ecology UnitGhent UniversityGhentBelgium
  2. 2.Behavioural Biology, Centre for Life SciencesUniversity of GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations