, Volume 99, Issue 1, pp 3–10 | Cite as

A novel marine silk

  • Katrin Kronenberger
  • Cedric Dicko
  • Fritz VollrathEmail author
Original Paper


The discovery of a novel silk production system in a marine amphipod provides insights into the wider potential of natural silks. The tube-building corophioid amphipod Crassicorophium bonellii produces from its legs fibrous, adhesive underwater threads that combine barnacle cement biology with aspects of spider silk thread extrusion spinning. We characterised the filamentous silk as a mixture of mucopolysaccharides and protein deriving from glands representing two distinct types. The carbohydrate and protein silk secretion is dominated by complex β-sheet structures and a high content of charged amino acid residues. The filamentous secretion product exits the gland through a pore near the tip of the secretory leg after having moved through a duct, which subdivides into several small ductules all terminating in a spindle-shaped chamber. This chamber communicates with the exterior and may be considered the silk reservoir and processing/mixing space, in which the silk is mechanically and potentially chemically altered and becomes fibrous. We assert that further study of this probably independently evolved, marine arthropod silk processing and secretion system can provide not only important insights into the more complex arachnid and insect silks but also into crustacean adhesion cements.


Marine amphipod Crassicorophium bonellii Silk gland Extrusion spinning Barnacle Spider 



We are grateful to D. Porter (University of Oxford) for discussions and to K. Halcrow (University of New Brunswick) for advice on the gland morphology. We thank D.A. Johnston (Biomedical Imaging Unit, University of Southampton) for confocal imaging and D. Lunn (University of Oxford) for help with the statistical analysis. The University of London Marine Biological Station (Millport) assisted with amphipod collection and access to SEM. V. Storch (Ruprecht-Karls University Heidelberg) kindly provided access to the TEM facility, while Stelzner Illustration helped with the scientific drawings. We are grateful for financial support provided by the European Research Council (grant SP2-GA-2008-233409) and the AFOSR (grant F49620-03-1-0111). To Skippy.

Conflict of Interest


Supplementary material

114_2011_853_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (141 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 140 kb)
114_2011_853_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (38 kb)
ESM 2 (PDF 38.3 kb)
114_2011_853_MOESM3_ESM.pdf (61 kb)
ESM 3 (PDF 60.7 kb)


  1. Aldred N, Scardino A, Cavaco A, de Nys R, Clare AS (2010) Attachment strength is a key factor in the selection of surfaces by barnacle cyprids (Balanus amphitrite) during settlement. Biofouling 26:287–299PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andersen SO (1970) Amino acid composition of spider silks. Comp Biochem Physiol 35:705–711CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cao Y, Wang B (2009) Biodegradation of silk biomaterials. Int J Mol Sci 10:1514–1524PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Case ST, Powers J, Hamilton R, Burton MJ (1994) Silk and silk proteins from two aquatic insects. In: Kaplan D, Adams WW, Farmer B, Viney C (eds) Silk polymers, 544 ACS Symposium Series. Washington, DC, pp 80–90Google Scholar
  5. Craig CL (1997) Evolution of arthropod silks. Annu Rev Entomol 42:231–267PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dicko C, Kenney JM, Vollrath F (2006) Beta-silks: enhancing and controlling aggregation in fibrous proteins: amyloids, prions and beta-proteins. Adv Protein Chem 73:17–53PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dixon IMT, Moore PG (1997) A comparative study on the tubes and feeding behaviour of eight species of corophioid Amphipoda and their bearing on phylogenetic relationships within the Corophioidea. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 352:93–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Edmonds D, Vollrath F (1992) The contribution of atmospheric water vapour to the formation and efficiency of a spider’s capture web. Proc Roy Soc London 248:145–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Engster MS (1976) Studies on silk secretion in the Trichoptera (F. Limnephilidae). Cell Tiss Res 169:77–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Foster-Smith RL, Shillaker RO (1977) Tube-irrigation by Lembos websteri Bate and Corophium bonellii Milne Edwards (Crustacea: Amphipoda). J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 26:289–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jahn TR et al (2010) The common architecture of cross-β amyloid. J Mol Biol 395(4):717–727PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jin HJ, Kaplan DL (2003) Mechanism of silk processing in insects and spiders. Nature 424:1057–1061PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kamino K (2001) Novel barnacle underwater adhesive protein is a charged amino acid-rich protein constituted by a cys-rich repetitive sequence. Biochem J 356:503–507PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kamino K (2008) Underwater adhesive of marine organisms as the vital link between biological science and material science. Mar Biotechnol 10:111–121PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kamino K, Odo S, Maruyama T (1996) Cement proteins of the acorn barnacle, Megabalanus rosa. Biol Bull 190:403–409PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Khandeparker L, Anil AC (2007) Underwater adhesion: the barnacle way. Int J Adhes Adhes 27:165–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Khurana R, Fink AL (2000) Do parallel beta-helix proteins have a unique Fourier transform infrared spectrum? Biophys J 78(2):994–1000PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kubelka J, Keiderling TA (2001) Differentiation of beta-sheet-forming structures: ab initio-based simulations of IR absorption and vibrational CD for model peptides and protein beta-sheets. J Am Chem Soc 123(48):12048–12058PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mondal M, Trivedy K, Kumar SN (2007) The silk proteins, sericin and fibroin in silkworm, Bombyx mori Linn. — a review. Caspian J Env Sci 5(2):63–76Google Scholar
  20. Naldrett MJ, Kaplan DL (1997) Characterization of barnacle (Balanus eburneus and B. crenatus) adhesive proteins. Mar Biol 127:629–635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nott JA, Foster BA (1969) On the structure of the antennular attachment organ of the cypris larva of Balanus balanoides (L.). Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 256:115–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Okano K, Shimizu K, Satuito CG, Fusetani N (1996) Visualisation of cement exocytosis in the cypris cement glands of Megabalanus rosa. J Exp Biol 199:2131–2137PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Rathore O, Winningham MJ, Sogah DY (2000) A novel silk-based segmented block copolymer containing GlyAlaGlyAla β-sheets templated by phenoxathiin. J Polym Sci A 38:352–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Regier JC et al (2010) Arthropod relationships revealed by phylogenomic analysis of nuclear protein-coding sequences. Nature 463:1079–1083PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Shillaker RO, Moore PG (1978) Tube-building by the amphipods Lembos websteri Bate and Corophium bonellii Milne Edwards. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 33:169–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Talbot P, Demers D (1993) Tegumental glands of crustacea. In: Horst MN, Freeman JA (eds) The Crustacean integument: morphology and biochemistry. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp 151–192Google Scholar
  27. Tatham AS, Shewry PR (2003) Comparative structures and properties of elastic proteins. In: Shewry PR, Tatham AS, Bailey AJ (eds) Elastomeric proteins. Cambridge Univ, Press, UK, pp 338–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Vollrath F (2000) Coevolution of behaviour and material in the spider’s web. In: Domenici P, Blake RW (eds) Biomechanics in animal behaviour. Bios, Oxford, pp 315–329Google Scholar
  29. Vollrath F, Knight D (1999) Structure and function of the silk production pathway in the spider Nephila edulis. Int J Biol Macromol 24:243–249PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Vollrath F, Knight D (2001) Liquid crystalline spinning of spider silk. Nature 410:541–548PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Vollrath F, Porter D (2009) Silks as ancient models for modern polymers. Polymer 50:5623–5632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Vollrath F, Tillinghast E (1991) Glycoprotein glue beneath a spider web’s aqueous coat. Naturwissenschaften 78:557–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Walker G (1981) The adhesion of barnacles. J Adhes 12:51–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wiegemann M (2005) Adhesion in blue mussels (Mytilus edulis) and barnacles (genus Balanus): mechanisms and technical applications. Aquat Sci 67:166–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Zhao H, Sun C, Stewart RJ, Waite H (2005) Cement proteins of the tube-building polychaete Phragmatopoma californica. J Biol Chem 280:42938–42944PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Katrin Kronenberger
    • 1
    • 2
  • Cedric Dicko
    • 1
    • 3
  • Fritz Vollrath
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Oxford Silk Group, Department of ZoologyUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
  2. 2.EM and Imaging Resource Facility, St. George’sUniversity of LondonLondonUK
  3. 3.Pure and Applied BiochemistryChemical Centre, Lund UniversityLundSweden

Personalised recommendations