Naturwissenschaften

, Volume 98, Issue 3, pp 237–240 | Cite as

Reclaiming the crown: queen to worker conflict over reproduction in Aphaenogaster cockerelli

  • Adrian A. Smith
  • Bert Hölldobler
  • Jürgen Liebig
Short Communication

Abstract

In many social taxa, reproductively dominant individuals sometimes use aggression to secure and maintain reproductive status. In the social insects, queen aggression towards subordinate individuals or workers has been documented and is predicted to occur only in species with a small colony size and a low level of queen–worker dimorphism. We report queen aggression towards reproductive workers in the ant species Aphaenogaster cockerelli, a species with a relatively large colony size and a high level of reproductive dimorphism. Through analysis of cuticular hydrocarbon profiles, we show that queens are aggressive only to reproductively active workers. Non-reproductive workers treated with a hydrocarbon typical for reproductives are attacked by workers but not by queens, which suggests different ways of recognition. We provide possible explanations of why queen aggression is observed in this species.

Keywords

Queen policing Cuticular hydrocarbons Policing Aggression Reproductive regulation 

References

  1. Bourke AFG (1988) Dominance orders, worker reproduction, and queen-worker conflict in the slave-making ant Harpagoxenus sublaevis. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 23:323–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bourke AFG (1999) Colony size, social complexity and reproductive conflict in social insects. J Evol Biol 12:245–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Gobin B, Billen J, Peeters C (2001) Dominance interactions regulate worker mating in the polygynous ponerine ant Gnamptogenys menadensis. Ethology 107:495–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Heinze J, Smith TA (1990) Dominance and fertility in a functionally monogynous ant. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 27:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Heinze J, Hölldobler B, Alpert G (1999) Reproductive conflict and division of labor in Eutetramorium mocquerysi, a myrmicine ant without morphologically distinct female reproductives. Ethology 105:701–717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hölldobler B, Carlin N (1989) Colony founding, queen control and worker reproduction in the ant Aphaenogaster (=Novomessor) cockerelli (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Psyche 96:131–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (2009) The superorganism: the beauty, elegance, and strangeness of insect societies. W. W. Norton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Liebig J (2010) Hydrocarbon profiles indicate fertility and dominance status in ant, bee, and wasp colonies. In: Blomquist GJ, Bagnères AG (eds) Insect hydrocarbons: biology, biochemistry, and chemical ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 254–281Google Scholar
  9. Monnin T, Peeters C (1999) Dominance hierarchy and reproductive conflicts among subordinates in a monogynous queenless ant. Behav Ecol 10:323–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Nakata K, Tsuji K (1996) The effect of colony size on conflict over male-production between gamergate and dominant workers in the ponerine ant Diacamma sp. Ethol Ecol Evol 8:147–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Oliveira PS, Hölldobler B (1991) Agonistic interactions and reproductive dominance in Pachycondyla obscuricornis (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Psyche 98:215–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ortius D, Heinze J (1999) Fertility signaling in queens of a North American ant. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 45:151–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Peeters C, Higashi S (1989) Reproductive dominance controlled by mutilation in the queenless ant Diacamma australe. Naturwissenschaften 76:177–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Peeters C, Hölldobler B (1995) Reproductive cooperation between queens and their mated workers: the complex life history of an ant with a valuable nest. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92:10977–10979CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Reeve HK (1992) Queen activation of lazy workers in colonies of the eusocial naked mole-rat. Nature 358:147–149CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Smith AA, Hölldobler B, Liebig J (2008) Hydrocarbon signals explain the pattern of worker and egg policing in the ant Aphaenogaster cockerelli. J Chem Ecol 34:1275–1282CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Smith AA, Hölldobler B, Liebig J (2009) Cuticular hydrocarbons reliably identify cheaters and allow enforcement of altruism in a social insect. Curr Biol 19:78–81CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Sommer K, Hölldobler B (1992) Coexistence and dominance among queens and mated workers in the ant Pachycondyla tridentata. Naturwissenschaften 79:470–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Young AJ, Carlson AA, Monfort SL, Russell AF, Bennett NC, Clutton-Brock T (2006) Stress and the suppression of subordinate reproduction in cooperatively breeding meerkats. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 103:12005–12010CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Adrian A. Smith
    • 1
  • Bert Hölldobler
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jürgen Liebig
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Life Sciences and Center for Social Dynamics and ComplexityArizona State UniversityTempeUSA
  2. 2.Biozentrum, Zoologie IIUniversität WürzburgWürzburgGermany

Personalised recommendations