Bees use three-dimensional information to improve target detection
Bumblebee detection of a flat circular disc (two-dimensional (2D) presentation) and a disc which was presented 10 cm in front of a structured background (and thus provided three-dimensional (3D) cues) was compared. A dual choice test using a Y-maze apparatus was conducted to estimate the minimum visual angle at which the bees were able to detect the disc. At large visual angles of 15, 10 and 5° bees’ performance between the 2D and the 3D presentation did not differ. However, when the disc subtended 3° at the bee’s eye, the bees performed significantly better when 3D information was available. Overall, bees were able to detect a target subtending a 40% smaller visual angle when it was presented in front of the structured background compared to a 2D presentation. This suggests that previous reports on the limits of target detection in bees using flat stimuli might have underestimated the bees’ ability to locate small flowers under natural conditions. Bees use motion parallax, i.e. the apparent relative motion of a stationary object against a background, for perceiving the third dimension. Our data suggest that bumblebees can integrate information from at least two types of feature detectors, motion and area, to improve single target detection.
KeywordsBombus terrestris Flower detection Motion parallax Visual perception 3D vision
- Julesz B (1960) Binocular depth perception of computer-generated patterns. Bell Syst Tech J 39:1125–1162Google Scholar
- Pettigrew JD (1986) The evolution of binocular vision. In: Pettigrew JD, Sanderson KJ, Levick WR (eds) Visual neuroscience. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 2008–2222Google Scholar
- Vogel S (1954) Blütenbiologische Typen als Elemente der Sippengliederung: Dargestellt anhand der Flora Südafrikas. Botanische Studien 1:1–339Google Scholar