, Volume 96, Issue 10, pp 1147–1156

A morphological and life history comparison between desert populations of a sit-and-pursue antlion, in reference to a co-occurring pit-building antlion



Although most antlion species do not construct pits, the vast majority of studies on antlions focused on pit-building species. We report here on a transplant experiment aiming to test for morphological and life history differences between two desert populations of a sit-and-pursue antlion species, Lopezus fedtschenkoi (Neuroptera: Myrmeleontidae), originating from habitats, which mainly differ in plant cover and productivity. We raised the antlion larvae in environmental chambers simulating either hyper-arid or Mediterranean climate. We found significant differences in the morphology and life history of L. fedtschenkoi larvae between the two populations. For example, the larvae originating from the more productive habitat pupated faster and had a higher growth rate. In agreement with the temperature–size rule, antlions reached higher final mass in the colder Mediterranean climate and exhibited a higher growth rate, but there was no difference in their developmental time. Observed differences in morphology between populations as well as those triggered by climate growing conditions could be explained by differences in size allometry. We also provide a quantitative description of the allometric growth axis, based on 12 morphological traits. Comparing the responses of L. fedtschenkoi with those observed in a co-occurring pit-building antlion indicated that there were neither shape differences that are independent of size nor was there a difference in the plasticity level between the two species.


Foraging mode Myrmeleontidae Reaction norm Temperature Transplant experiment 


  1. Abramsky Z, Brand S, Rosenzweig ML (1985) Geographical ecology of gerbilline rodents in sand dune habitats of Israel. J Biogeogr 12:363–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arendt JD (1997) Adaptive intrinsic growth rates: an integration across taxa. Q Rev Biol 72:149–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arnett AE, Gotelli NJ (1999) Geographic variation in life-history traits of the ant lion, Myrmeleon immaculatus: evolutionary implications of Bergmann’s rule. Evolution 53:1180–1188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Atkinson D (1994) Temperature and organism size—a biological law for ectotherms? Adv Ecol Res 3:1–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Atkinson D, Sibly RM (1997) Why are organisms usually bigger in colder environments? Making sense of a life history puzzle. Trends Ecol Evol 12:235–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berger D, Wlaters R, Gotthard K (2006) What keeps insects small?—size dependent predation on two species of butterfly larvae. Evol Ecol 20:575–589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blanckenhorn WU (1997) Altitudinal life history variation in the dung flies Scathophaga stercoraria and Sepsis cynipsea. Oecologia 109:342–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blanckenhorn WU, Demont M (2004) Bergmann and converse Bergmann latitudinal clines in arthropods: two ends of a continuum? Integr Comp Biol 44:413–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cain ML (1987) Prey capture behavior and diel movement of Brachynemurus (Neuroptera: Myrmeleotidae) antlion larvae in south central Florida. Fla Entomol 70:397–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. David JR, Gibert P, Moreteau B (2004) Evolution of reaction norms. In: DeWitt TJ, Scheiner SM (eds) Phenotypic plasticity: functional and conceptual approaches. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 50–63Google Scholar
  11. Endler JA (1995) Multiple-trait coevolution and environmental gradients in guppies. Trends Ecol Evol 10:22–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Futuyma DJ (1998) Evolutionary biology, 3rd edn. Sinauer, SunderlandGoogle Scholar
  13. Gotthard K, Nylin S, Wiklund C (1994) Adaptive variation in growth rate: life history costs and consequences in the speckled wood butterfly, Pararge aegeria. Oecologia 99:281–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Griffiths D (1980) The feeding biology of ant-lion larvae: prey capture, handling and utilization. J Anim Ecol 49:99–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. He J-H (2007) Shrinkage of body size of small insects: a possible link to global warming? Choas Soliton Fract 34:727–729CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Honek A (1993) Intraspecific variation in body size and fecundity in insects: a general relationship. Oikos 66:484–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Huey RB, Pianka ER (1981) Ecological consequences of foraging mode. Ecology 62:991–999CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Huey RB, Carlson M, Crozier L, Frazier M, Hamilton H, Harley C, Hoang A, Kingsolver JG (2002) Plants versus animals: do they deal with stress in different ways? Integr Comp Biol 42:415–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. James FC (1970) Geographic size variation in birds and its relationship to climate. Ecology 51:365–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kalbfleisch JD, Prentice RL (2002) The statistical analysis of failure time data. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  21. Kingsolver JG, Huey RB (2008) Size, temperature, and fitness: three rules. Evol Ecol Res 10:251–268Google Scholar
  22. Kingsolver JG, Pfennig DW (2004) Individual-level selection as a cause of Cope’s rule of phyletic size increase. Evolution 58:1608–1612PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Nilssen AC (1997) Factors affecting size, longevity and fecundity in the reindeer oestrid flies Hypoderma tarandi (L.) and Cephenemyia trompe (Modeer). Ecol Entomol 22:294–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nylin S, Gotthard K (1998) Plasticity in life-history traits. Annu Rev Entomol 43:63–83CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Partridge L, French V (1996) Thermal evolution of ectotherm body size: why get big in the cold? In: Johnston IA, Bennett AF (eds) Animals and temperature: phenotypic and evolutionary adaptation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 265–292Google Scholar
  26. Piglliucci M (2005) Evolution of phenotypic plasticity: where are we going now? Trends Ecol Evol 20:481–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Reeve MW, Fowler K, Partridge L (2000) Increased body size confers greater fitness at lower experimental temperature in male Drosophila melanogaster. J Evol Biol 13:836–844CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Reznick D, Travis J (2001) Adaptation. In: Fox CW, Roff DA, Fairbairn DJ (eds) Evolutionary ecology: concepts and case studies. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 44–57Google Scholar
  29. Roff DA (2001) Age and size at maturity. In: Fox CW, Roff DA, Fairbairn DJ (eds) Evolutionary ecology: concepts and case studies. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 99–112Google Scholar
  30. Scharf I, Ovadia O (2006) Factors influencing site abandonment and site selection in a sit-and-wait predator: a review of pit-building antlion larvae. J Insect Behav 19:197–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Scharf I, Filin I, Golan M, Buchshtav M, Subach A, Ovadia O (2008) A comparison between desert and Mediterranean antlion populations: differences in life history and morphology. J Evol Biol 21:162–172PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Scharf I, Filin I, Ben-Yehoshua D, Ovadia O (2009) Phenotypic plasticity and variation in morphological and life-history traits of antlion adults across a climatic gradient. Zoology 112:139–150CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Simon D (1988) Ant-lions (Neuroptera: Myrmeleontidae) of the coastal plain: systematical, ecological and zoogeographical aspects with emphasis on the coexistence of a species guild of the unstable dunes. PhD thesis, Tel-Aviv University, IsraelGoogle Scholar
  34. Speight MR, Hunter MD, Watt AD (1999) Ecology of insects: concepts and applications. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  35. Vitt LJ, Congdon JD (1978) Body shape, reproductive effort, and relative clutch mass in lizards: resolution of a paradox. Am Nat 112:595–608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Volis S, Mendlinger S, Ward D (2002) Adaptive traits of wild barley plants of Mediterranean and desert origin. Oecologia 133:131–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Yom-Tov Y, Geffen E (2006) Geographic variation in body size: the effects of ambient temperature and precipitation. Oecologia 148:213–218CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Zelditch ML, Swiderski DL, Sheets HD, Fink WL (2004) Geometric morphometrics for biologists: a primer. Elsevier Academic, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Inon Scharf
    • 1
  • Ido Filin
    • 1
    • 2
  • Aziz Subach
    • 1
  • Ofer Ovadia
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Life SciencesBen-Gurion University of the NegevBeer-ShevaIsrael
  2. 2.Department of Mathematics and StatisticsUniversity of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations