Advertisement

Naturwissenschaften

, Volume 96, Issue 9, pp 1127–1132 | Cite as

Bacteria on housefly eggs, Musca domestica, suppress fungal growth in chicken manure through nutrient depletion or antifungal metabolites

  • Kevin Lam
  • Kelsie Thu
  • Michelle Tsang
  • Margo Moore
  • Gerhard Gries
SHORT COMMUNICATION

Abstract

Female houseflies, Musca domestica (Diptera: Muscidae), lay their eggs in ephemeral resources such as animal manure. Hatching larvae compete for essential nutrients with fungi that also colonize such resources. Both the well-known antagonistic relationship between bacteria and fungi and the consistent presence of the bacterium Klebsiella oxytoca on housefly eggs led us to hypothesize (1) that K. oxytoca, and possibly other bacteria on housefly eggs, help curtail the growth of fungal resource competitors and (2) that such fungi indeed adversely affect the development of housefly larvae. Bacteria washed from housefly eggs significantly reduced the growth of fungi in chicken manure. Nineteen bacterial strains and ten fungal strains were isolated from housefly eggs or chicken manure, respectively. Co-culturing each of all the possible bacterium–fungus pairs revealed that the bacteria as a group, but no single bacterium, significantly suppressed the growth of all fungal strains tested. The bacteria's adverse effect on fungi is due to resource nutrient depletion and/or the release of antifungal chemicals. Well-established fungi in resources significantly reduced the number of larval offspring that completed development to adult flies.

Keywords

Houseflies Musca domestica Klebsiella oxytoca Bacterial symbiont Fungi Communication ecology 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank E. Zabek and S. Byrne for DNA sequencing of bacterial and fungal isolates, S. Perlman for constructive comments, and E. Kiehlmann for proofreading the manuscript. Funding was provided by a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)—Canada Graduate Scholarship to K.L., NSERC—Undergraduate Student Research Awards to K.T. and M.T., and by an NSERC—Industrial Research Chair to G.G., with Pherotech International, SC Johnson Canada, and Global Forest Science (GF-18-2007-226; GF-18-2007-227) as sponsors.

Supplementary material

114_2009_574_MOESM1_ESM.doc (165 kb)
ESM 1 (DOC 168 kb)

References

  1. Atkinson WD (1981) An ecological interaction between citrus fruit, Penicillium molds and Drosophila immigrans Sturtevant (Diptera: Drosophilidae). Ecol Entomol 6:339–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brucker RM, Harris RN, Schwantes CR, Gallaher TN, Flaherty DC, Lam BA, Minbiole KPC (2008) Amphibian chemical defense: antifungal metabolites of the microsymbiont Janthinobacterium lividum on the salamander Plethodon cinereus. J Chem Ecol 43:142–1429. doi: 10.1007/s10886-008-9555-7 Google Scholar
  3. Burkepile DE, Parker JD, Woodson CB, Mills HJ, Kubanek J, Sobecky PA, Hay ME (2006) Chemically mediated competition between microbes and animals: microbes as consumers in food webs. Ecology 87:2821–2831PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cardoza YJ, Klepzig KD, Raffa KF (2006) Bacteria in oral secretions of an endophytic insect inhibit antagonistic fungi. Ecol Entomol 31:636–645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hongoh U, Sharma VK, Prakash T, Noda S, Toh H, Taylor TD, Kudo T, Sakaki Y, Toyoda A, Hattori M, Ohkuma M (2008) Genome of an endosymbiont coupling N-2 fixation to cellulolysis within protist cells in termite gut. Science 322:1108–1109. doi: 10.1126/science.1165578 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Karcher EL, Johnson CS, Beitz DC, Stabel JR (2008) Osteopontin immunoreactivity in the ileum and ileocecal lymph node of dairy cows naturally infected with Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 126:142–148. doi: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2008.05.030 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Krejzar V, Mertelik J, Pankova I, Kloudova K, Kudela V (2008) Pseudomonas marginalis associated with soft rot of Zantedeschia spp. Plant Prot Sci 44:85–90Google Scholar
  8. Lam K, Babor D, Duthie B, Babor E-M, Moore M, Gries G (2007) Proliferating bacterial symbionts on house fly eggs affect oviposition behaviour of adult flies. Anim Behav 74:81–92. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.11.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lane DJ (1991) 16S/23S rRNA sequencing. In: Stachebrandt E, Goodfellow M (eds) Nucleic acid techniques in bacterial systematics. Wiley, New York, pp 115–175Google Scholar
  10. Leigh J, Hodge A, Fitter AH (2009) Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi can transfer substantial amounts of nitrogen to their host plant from organic material. New Phytol 181:199–207. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02630.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mille-Lindblom C, Tranvik LJ (2003) Antagonism between bacteria and fungi on decomposing aquatic plant litter. Microb Ecol 45:173–182PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Oliver KM, Russell JA, Moran NA, Hunter MS (2003) Facultative bacterial symbionts in aphids confer resistance to parasitic wasps. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100:1803–1807PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Rabie E-AM, Rincon A, Arenal F, Mercedes LM, El Mourabit N, Barrijal S, Pueyo JJ (2008) Genetic diversity and symbiotic efficiency of rhizobial isolates obtained from nodules of Arachis hypogaea in northwestern Morocco. Soil Biol Biochem 40:2911–2914. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.08.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Rochon K, Lysyk TJ, Selinger LB (2004) Persistence of Escherichia coli in immature house and stable fly (Diptera: Muscidae) in relation to larval growth and survival. J Med Entomol 41:1082–1089PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Rohlfs M, Obmann B, Peterson R (2005) Competition with filamentous fungi and its implications for a gregarious life-style in insects living on ephemeral resources. Ecol Entomol 30:556–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Rohlfs M (2006) Genetic variation and the role of insect life history traits in the ability of Drosophila larvae to develop in the presence of a competing filamentous fungus. Evol Ecol 20:271–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rozen DE, Engelmoer DJP, Smiseth PH (2008) Antimicrobial strategies in burying beetles breeding on carrion. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:17890–17895PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ryker LC, Yandell KL (1983) Effect of verbenone on aggregation of Dendroctonus ponderosae (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) to synthetic attractant. Z Angew Entomol 86:452–459Google Scholar
  19. Saraf A, Larsson L, Burge H, Milton D (1997) Quantification of ergosterol and 3-hydroxy fatty acids in settled house dust by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry: comparison with fungal culture and determination of endotoxin by a Limulus amebocyte lysate assay. Appl Environ Microbiol 63:2554–2559PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Schmidtmann ET, Martin PAW (1992) Relationship between selected bacteria and the growth of immature house flies, Musca domestica, in an axenic test system. J Med Entomol 29:232–235PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Suzuki S (2001) Suppression of fungal development on carcasses by the burying beetle Nicrophorus quadripunctatus (Coleoptera: Silphidae). Entomol Sci 4:403–405Google Scholar
  22. Vannini C, Schena A, Verni F, Rosati G (2004) Euplotes magnicirratus (Ciliophora, Hypotrichia) depends on its bacterial endosymbiont ‘Candidatus Dvosia euplotis’ for food digestion. Aquat Microb Ecol 36:19–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wertheim B, Marchais J, Vet LEM, Dicke M (2002) Allee effect in larval resource exploitation in Drosophila: an interaction among density of adults, larvae, and micro-organisms. Ecol Entomol 27:608–617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Yoder JA, Benoit JB, Delinger DL, Tank JL, Zittler LW (2008) An endosymbiotic conidial fungus, Scopulariopsis brevicaulis, protects the American dog tick, Dermancentor variables, from desiccation imposed by an entomopathogenic fungus. J Invertebr Pathol 97:119–127. doi: 10.1016/j.jip. 2007.07.011 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Zvereva EL (1986a) The effect of ecological factors on competition between house fly larvae (Musca domestica L., Muscidae, Diptera) and microscopic fungi. Entomologicheskoye Obozreniye 4:677–682Google Scholar
  26. Zvereva EL (1986b) Peculiarities of competitive interaction between larvae of the house fly Musca domestica and microscopic fungi. Zoologicheskii Zhurnal 65:1517–1525Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kevin Lam
    • 1
  • Kelsie Thu
    • 1
  • Michelle Tsang
    • 1
  • Margo Moore
    • 1
  • Gerhard Gries
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesSimon Fraser UniversityBurnabyCanada

Personalised recommendations