Waterproof and translucent wings at the same time: problems and solutions in butterflies
- 675 Downloads
Although the colour of butterflies attracts the most attention, the waterproofing properties of their wings are also extremely interesting. Most butterfly wings are considered “super-hydrophobic” because the contact angle (CA) with a water drop exceeds 150°. Usually, butterfly wings are covered with strongly overlapping scales; however, in the case of transparent or translucent wings, scale cover is reduced; thus, the hydrophobicity could be affected. Here, we present a comparative analysis of wing hydrophobicity and its dependence on morphology for two species with translucent wings Parantica sita (Nymphalidae) and Parnassius glacialis (Papilionidae). These species have very different life histories: P. sita lives for up to 6 months as an adult and migrates over long distance, whereas P. glacialis lives for less than 1 month and does not migrate. We measured the water CA and analysed wing morphology with scanning electron microscopy and atomic force microscopy. P. sita has super-hydrophobic wing surfaces, with CA > 160°, whereas P. glacialis did not (CA = 100–135°). Specialised scales were found on the translucent portions of P. sita wings. These scales were ovoid and much thinner than common scales, erect at about 30°, and leaving up to 80% of the wing surface uncovered. The underlying bare wing surface had a remarkable pattern of ridges and knobs. P. glacialis also had over 80% of the wing surface uncovered, but the scales were either setae-like or spade-like. The bare surface of the wing had an irregular wavy smooth pattern. We suggest a mode of action that allows this super-hydrophobic effect with an incompletely covered wing surface. The scales bend, but do not collapse, under the pressure of a water droplet, and the elastic recovery of the structure at the borders of the droplet allows a high apparent CA. Thus, P. sita can be translucent without losing its waterproof properties. This characteristic is likely necessary for the long life and migration of this species. This is the first study of some of the effects on the hydrophobicity of translucency through scales’ cover reduction in butterfly wings and on the morphology associated with improved waterproofing.
KeywordsBiomaterials Functional morphology Hydrophobic Scales Water contact angle
We thank Prof. Ko Okumura (Ochanomizu Women’s University, Tokyo, Japan) and Prof. Shinya Yoshioka (Osaka University, Graduate School of Frontier Sciences) for insightful discussions. We are also grateful to Hiroki Takamatsu (Kyoto University, Graduate School of Agriculture, Laboratory of Insect Ecology) for supplying some butterfly specimens. We thank the comments and suggestions of the referees and the editors, which considerably improved an early version of this manuscript.
Water drop (diameter approx. 2.5 mm) sled sideward with a micromanipulator over the wing of P. sita (MOV 7579 kb)
Water drop (diameter approx. 2.5 mm) sled sideward with a micromanipulator over the wing of P. sita, pressed up and down (MOV 8102 kb)
- Berthier S (2007) Iridiscences. The physical colors of insects. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Bush JWM, Hu DL, Prakash M (2008) The integument of water-walking arthropods: Form and function. In: Casas J, Simpson SJ (eds) Advances in insect physiology. insect mechanics and control. Academic Press, New York, pp 117–192Google Scholar
- Kawabe S (1994) Inference of life pattern on "Parantica sita niphonica Moore"[sic.] in Okayama prefecture (in Japanese). Bull Okayama Univ Sci A 30:141–151Google Scholar
- Miyatake Y, Fukuda H, Kanazawa I (2003) Asagimadara. The travelling butterfly (In Japanese). Mushi sha, TokyoGoogle Scholar
- Perez Goodwyn PJ (2008) Anti-wetting surfaces in Heteroptera (Insecta): hairy solutions to any problem. In: Gorb SN (ed) Functional surfaces in biology: little structures with big effects: vol 1. Springer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
- Sato E (2006) Asagimadara: The mystery of the sea-crossing butterfly (In Japanese). Yama to Keikoku sha, TokyoGoogle Scholar
- Uesugi K (1996) Adaptive significance of Batesian mimicry in the swallowtail butterfly, Papilio polytes (Insecta, Papilionidae): associative learning in a predator. Ethol 102:762–775Google Scholar
- Vukusic P, Sambles JR, Lawrence CR (2004) Structurally assisted blackness in butterfly scales. Biol Lett 271:237–239Google Scholar