Naturwissenschaften

, Volume 95, Issue 5, pp 461–467 | Cite as

Glass buildings on river banks as “polarized light traps” for mass-swarming polarotactic caddis flies

  • György Kriska
  • Péter Malik
  • Ildikó Szivák
  • Gábor Horváth
Short Communication

Abstract

The caddis flies Hydropsyche pellucidula emerge at dusk from the river Danube and swarm around trees and bushes on the river bank. We document here that these aquatic insects can also be attracted en masse to the vertical glass surfaces of buildings on the river bank. The individuals lured to dark, vertical glass panes land, copulate, and remain on the glass for hours. Many of them are trapped by the partly open, tiltable windows. In laboratory choice experiments, we showed that ovipositing H. pellucidula are attracted to highly and horizontally polarized light stimulating their ventral eye region and, thus, have positive polarotaxis. In the field, we documented that highly polarizing vertical black glass surfaces are significantly more attractive to both female and male H. pellucidula than weakly polarizing white ones. Using video polarimetry, we measured the reflection-polarization characteristics of vertical glass surfaces of buildings where caddis flies swarmed. We propose that after its emergence from the river, H. pellucidula is attracted to buildings by their dark silhouettes and the glass-reflected, horizontally polarized light. After sunset, this attraction may be strengthened by positive phototaxis elicited by the buildings’ lights. The novelty of this visual–ecological phenomenon is that the attraction of caddis flies to vertical glass surfaces has not been expected because vertical glass panes do not resemble the horizontal surface of waters from which these insects emerge and to which they must return to oviposit.

Keywords

Caddis fly Hydropsyche pellucidula Polarization vision Polarotaxis Glass surface Ecological trap 

References

  1. Bernáth B, Gál J, Horváth G (2004) Why is it worth flying at dusk for aquatic insects? Polarotactic water detection is easiest at low solar elevations. J Exp Biol 207:755–765PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brodskiy AK (1973) The swarming behavior of mayflies (Ephemeroptera). Entomol Rev 52:33–39Google Scholar
  3. Csabai Z, Boda P, Bernáth B, Kriska G, Horváth G (2006) A ‘polarisation sun-dial’ dictates the optimal time of day for dispersal by flying aquatic insects. Freshwater Biol 51:1341–1350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Horváth G, Varjú D (1997) Polarization pattern of freshwater habitats recorded by video polarimetry in red, green and blue spectral ranges and its relevance for water detection by aquatic insects. J Exp Biol 200:1155–1163Google Scholar
  5. Horváth G, Varjú D (2003) Polarized Light in Animal Vision—Polarization Patterns in Nature. Springer-Verlag, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  6. Horváth G, Zeil J (1996) Kuwait oil lakes as insect traps. Nature 379:303–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Horváth G, Bernáth B, Molnár G (1998) Dragonflies find crude oil visually more attractive than water: multiple-choice experiments on dragonfly polarotaxis. Naturwissenschaften 85:292–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Horváth G, Malik P, Kriska G, Wildermuth H (2007) Ecological traps for dragonflies in a cemetery: the attraction of Sympetrum species (Odonata: Libellulidae) by horizontally polarizing black gravestones. Freshwater Biol 52:1700–1709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kriska G, Horváth G, Andrikovics S (1998) Why do mayflies lay their eggs en masse on dry asphalt roads? Water-imitating polarized light reflected from asphalt attracts Ephemeroptera. J Exp Biol 201:2273–2286PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Kriska G, Csabai Z, Boda P, Malik P, Horváth G (2006) Why do red and dark-coloured cars lure aquatic insects? The attraction of water insects to car paintwork explained by reflection-polarization signals. Proc R Soc B 273:1667–1671PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kriska G, Bernáth B, Horváth G (2007) Positive polarotaxis in a mayfly that never leaves the water surface: polarotactic water detection in Palingenia longicauda (Ephemeroptera). Naturwissenschaften 94:148–154PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Malicky H (2005) Atlas of European Trichoptera. Springer-Verlag, Dordrecht, p 359Google Scholar
  13. Reich P, Downes BJ (2003) Experimental evidence for physical cues involved in oviposition site selection of lotic hydrobiosid caddis flies. Oecologia 136:465–475PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Savolainen E (1978) Swarming in Ephemeroptera: the mechanism of swarming and the effects of illumination and weather. Annales Zoologica Fennici 15:17–52Google Scholar
  15. Schlaepfer MA, Runge MC, Sherman PW (2002) Ecological and evolutionary traps. Trends Ecol Evol 17:474–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Schwind R (1985) Sehen unter und über Wasser, Sehen von Wasser. Naturwissenschaften 72:343–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Schwind R (1991) Polarization vision in water insects and insects living on a moist substrate. J Comp Physiol A 169:531–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Schwind R (1995) Spectral regions in which aquatic insects see reflected polarized light. J Comp Physiol A 177:439–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Umow N (1905) Chromatische Depolarisation durch Lichtzerstreuung. Physikalische Zeitschrift 6:674–676Google Scholar
  20. Wildermuth H (1998) Dragonflies recognize the water of rendezvous and oviposition sites by horizontally polarized light: a behavioural field test. Naturwissenschaften 85:297–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Wildermuth H, Horváth G (2005) Visual deception of a male Libellula depressa by the shiny surface of a parked car (Odonata: Libellulidae). Int J Odonatol 8:97–105Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • György Kriska
    • 1
  • Péter Malik
    • 2
  • Ildikó Szivák
    • 1
    • 2
  • Gábor Horváth
    • 2
  1. 1.Group for Methodology in Biology Teaching, Biological InstituteEötvös UniversityBudapestHungary
  2. 2.Biooptics Laboratory, Department of Biological Physics, Physical InstituteEötvös UniversityBudapestHungary

Personalised recommendations