, Volume 95, Issue 2, pp 91–97 | Cite as

New fossil ants in French Cretaceous amber (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)

  • Vincent PerrichotEmail author
  • André Nel
  • Didier Néraudeau
  • Sébastien Lacau
  • Thierry Guyot
Original Paper


Recent studies on the ant phylogeny are mainly based on the molecular analyses of extant subfamilies and do not include the extinct, only Cretaceous subfamily Sphecomyrminae. However, the latter is of major importance for ant relationships, as it is considered the most basal subfamily. Therefore, each new discovery of a Mesozoic ant is of high interest for improving our understanding of their early history and basal relationships. In this paper, a new sphecomyrmine ant, allied to the Burmese amber genus Haidomyrmex, is described from mid-Cretaceous amber of France as Haidomyrmodes mammuthus gen. and sp. n. The diagnosis of the tribe Haidomyrmecini is emended based on the new type material, which includes a gyne (alate female) and two incomplete workers. The genus Sphecomyrmodes, hitherto known by a single species from Burmese amber, is also reported and a new species described as S. occidentalis sp. n. after two workers remarkably preserved in a single piece of Early Cenomanian French amber. The new fossils provide additional information on early ant diversity and relationships and demonstrate that the monophyly of the Sphecomyrminae, as currently defined, is still weakly supported.


Insecta Formicidae Sphecomyrminae Haidomyrmecini Cretaceous France 



We are grateful to Eric Depré for donating the piece of amber from Fouras with the sphecomyrmines reported here. We thank Gaël de Ploëg (MNHN) for preparation of some type material; Gilbert Hodebert (MNHN) for drawings of some specimens; Carl Findley for checking English; and anonymous reviewers for useful comments. This work was supported by the CNRS programme ECLIPSE II on “Cretaceous climates and ecosystems” and by Alexander von Humboldt Foundation for VP.


  1. Astruc C, Julien JF, Errard C, Lenoir A (2004) Phylogeny of ants (Formicidae) based on morphology and DNA sequence data. Mol Phylogenet Evol 31:880–893PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baroni Urbani C, Bolton B, Ward PS (1992) The internal phylogeny of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Syst Entomol 17:301–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bolton B (1990a) Army ants reassessed: the phylogeny and classification of the doryline section (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). J Nat Hist 24:1339–1364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bolton B (1990b) Abdominal characters and status of the cerapachyine ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). J Nat Hist 24:53–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bolton B (1995) A new general catalogue of the ants of the world. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  6. Bolton B (2003) Synopsis and classification of Formicidae. Mem Am Entomol Inst 71:1–370Google Scholar
  7. Brady SG, Schultz TR, Fisher BL, Ward PS (2006) Evaluating alternative hypotheses for the early evolution and diversification of ants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:18172–18177PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brothers DJ (1975) Phylogeny and classification of the Aculeate Hymenoptera, with special reference to Mutillidae. Univ Kansas Sci Bull 50:483–648Google Scholar
  9. Brothers DJ (1999) Phylogeny and evolution of wasps, ants and bees (Hymenoptera, Chrysidoidea, Vespoidea and Apoidea). Zool Scr 28:233–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brothers DJ, Carpenter JM (1993) Phylogeny of Aculeata: Chrysidoidea and Vespoidea (Hymenoptera). J Hymenoptera Res 2:227–302Google Scholar
  11. Crozier RH (2006) Charting uncertainty about ant origins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:18029–18030PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dlussky GM (1996) Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) from Burmese amber. Paleont J 30:449–454Google Scholar
  13. Engel MS, Grimaldi DA (2005) Primitive new ants in Cretaceous amber from Myanmar, New Jersey, and Canada (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Am Mus Novit 3485:1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Grimaldi DA, Agosti D, Carpenter JM (1997) New and rediscovered primitive ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in Cretaceous amber from New Jersey, and their phylogenetics relationships. Am Mus Novit 3208:1–43Google Scholar
  15. Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (1990) The ants. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  16. Jolivet P (1996) Ants and plants—an example of coevolution. Backhuys, LeidenGoogle Scholar
  17. Moreau CS, Bell CD, Vila R, Archibald SB, Pierce NE (2006) Phylogeny of the ants: diversification in the age of angiosperms. Science 312:101–104PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nel A (1997) The probabilistic inference of unknown data in phylogenetic analysis. In: Grancolas P (ed) The origin of biodiversity in insects: phylogenetic tests of evolutionary scenarios. Mém Mus Natl Hist Nat, Paris 173, pp 305–327Google Scholar
  19. Néraudeau D, Perrichot V, Dejax J, Masure E, Nel A, Philippe M, Moreau P, Guillocheau F, Guyot T (2002) Un nouveau gisement à ambre insectifère et à végétaux (Albien terminal probable): Archingeay (Charente-Maritime, France). Geobios 35:233–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Néraudeau D, Allain R, Perrichot V, Videt B, De Broin F, Guillocheau F, Philippe M, Rage JC, Vullo R (2003) Découverte d'un dépôt paralique à bois fossiles, ambre insectifère et restes d'Iguanodontidae (Dinosauria, Ornithopoda) dans le Cénomanien inférieur de Fouras (Charente-Maritime, Sud-Ouest de la France). CR Palevol 2:221–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ohnishi H, Imai HT, Yamamoto MT (2003) Molecular phylogenetic analysis of ant subfamily relationships inferred from rDNA sequences. Genes Genet Syst 78:419–425PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ouellette GD, Fisher BL, Girman DJ (2006) Molecular systematics of basal subfamilies of ants using 28S rRNA (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Mol Phylogenet Evol 40:359–369PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Perrichot V (2005) Environnements paraliques à ambre et à végétaux du Crétacé nord-aquitain (Charentes, Sud-Ouest de la France). Mém Géosciences Rennes 118:1–310Google Scholar
  24. Perrichot V, Lacau S, Néraudeau D, Nel A (2007) Fossil evidence for the early ant evolution. Naturwissenschaften DOI  10.1007/s00114-007-0301-8
  25. Ross AJ, York PV (2000) A list of type and figured specimens of insects and other inclusions in Burmese amber. Bull Nat Hist Mus, London (Geol) 56:11–20Google Scholar
  26. Saux C, Fisher BL, Spicer GS (2004) Dracula ant phylogeny as inferred by nuclear 28S rDNA sequences and implications for ant systematics (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Amblyoponinae). Mol Phylogenet Evol 33:457–468PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Shattuck SO (1992) Higher classification of the ant subfamilies Aneuretinae, Dolichoderinae, and Formicinae. Syst Entomol 17:199–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Taylor RW (1978) Nothomyrmecia macrops: a living fossil-ant rediscovered. Science 201:979–985PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ward PS (1990) The ant subfamily Pseudomyrmecinae (Formicidae): generic revision and relationship to other Formicidae. Syst Entomol 15:449–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ward PS, Brady SG (2003) Phylogeny and biogeography of the ant subfamily Myrmeciinae (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Invertebr Syst 17:361–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wilson EO, Carpenter FM, Brown WL Jr (1967) The first Mesozoic ants, with the description of a new subfamily. Psyche 74:1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vincent Perrichot
    • 1
    Email author
  • André Nel
    • 2
  • Didier Néraudeau
    • 3
  • Sébastien Lacau
    • 4
  • Thierry Guyot
    • 5
  1. 1.Museum für Naturkunde der Humboldt-Universität zu BerlinBerlinGermany
  2. 2.Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Entomologie, UMR CNRS 5202ParisFrance
  3. 3.Géosciences RennesUMR CNRS 6118, Université Rennes 1Rennes cedexFrance
  4. 4.Laboratório de Zoologia e Parasitologia Animal, DEBIUniversidade Estadual do Sudoeste da BahiaItapetingaBrasil
  5. 5.LBEM–Institut de la MerUniversité La RochelleLa RochelleFrance

Personalised recommendations