, Volume 94, Issue 10, pp 847–852 | Cite as

Sexual contact influences orientation to plant attractant in Colorado potato beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata Say (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae)

Short Communication


Chemical signals emitted by insects and their hosts are important for sexual communication and host selection. Plant volatiles facilitate the location of suitable hosts for feeding and oviposition, and may moderate responses to sex and aggregation pheromones. While mating has been shown to moderate behavioral responses to pheromones in a number of insects, little is known about the effects of mating on behavioral responses of insects to plant attractants, and even less is known about the mechanisms involved. In this study, mating was shown to decrease behavioral responses of the Colorado potato beetle to a host kairomone within 24 h, and attraction to the kairomone recovers only after 72 h. This decrease in responsiveness also occurs when only contact with the opposite sex is allowed; the effect is not observed with contact among individuals of the same sex. Peripheral olfactory responses to a component of the kairomone correlate with the observed behavioral responses and suggest involvement of antennal receptors in the behavioral change.


Kairomone Behavioral change Colorado potato beetle Olfaction Leptinotarsa decemlineata Mating Sexual contact 


  1. Adeesan C, Rahalkar GW, Tamhankar AJ (1969) Effect of age and previous mating on the response of khapra beetle males to female sex pheromone. Entomol Exp Appl 12:229–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anton S, Gadenne C (1999) Effect of juvenile hormone on the central nervous processing of sex pheromone in an insect. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:5764–5767PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brase CH, Brase CP (1983) Understanding Statistics. D.C. Heath, Lexington, MA, USAGoogle Scholar
  4. Chapman T, Bangham J, Vinti G, Seifried B, Lung O, Wolfner MF, Smith HZ, Partridge L (2003) The sex peptide of Drosophila melanogaster: female post-mating responses analyzed by using RNA interference. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:9923–9928PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Davis EE (1984) Regulation of sensitivity in the peripheral chemoreceptor systems for host-seeking behaviour by a haemolymph-borne factor in Aedes aegypti. J Insect Physiol 30:179–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dickens JC (1999) Predator–prey interactions: olfactory adaptations of generalist and specialist predators. Agric For Entomol 1:47–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dickens JC (2000) Orientation of Colorado potato beetle to natural and synthetic blends of volatiles emitted by potato plants. Agric For Entomol 2:167–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dickens JC (2002) Behavioural responses of larvae of Colorado potato beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), to host plant volatile blends attractive to adults. Agric For Entomol 4:309–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dickens JC (2006) Plant volatiles moderate response to aggregation pheromone in Colorado potato beetle. J Appl Entomol 130:26–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dickens JC, Oliver JE, Hollister B, Davis JC, Klun JA (2002) Breaking a paradigm: male-produced aggregation pheromone for Colorado potato beetle. J Exp Biol 205:1925–1933PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Duncan DB (1955) Multiple range and multiple F tests. Biometrics 11:1–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fox AN, Pitts RJ, Robertson HM, Carlson JR, Zweibel LJ (2001) Candidate odorant receptors from the malaria vector mosquito Anopheles gambiae and evidence of down-regulation in response to blood feeding. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:14693–14697PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gadenne C, Dufour M-C, Anton S (2001) Transient post-mating inhibition of behavioural and central nervous responses to sex pheromone in an insect. Proc R Soc Lond B 268:1631–1635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Howse PE, Stevens IDR, Jones OT (1998) Insect pheromones and their use in pest management. Chapman & Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  15. Jang EB (1995) Effects of mating and accessory gland injections on olfactory-mediated behavior in the female Mediterranean fruit fly Ceratitis capitata. J Insect Physiol 41:705–710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Landolt PJ (1989) Attraction of the cabbage looper to host plants and host plant odor in the laboratory. Entomol Exp Appl 53:117–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Landolt PJ, Phillips TW (1997) Host plant influences on sex pheromone behavior of phytophagous insects. Annu Rev Entomol 42:371–391PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Martel JW, Alford AR, Dickens JC (2005) Synthetic host volatiles increase efficacy of trap cropping for management of Colorado potato beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Say). Agric For Entomol 7:79–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. McIndoo NE (1926) An insect olfactometer. J Econ Entomol 19:545–571Google Scholar
  20. Mechaber WL, Capaldo CT, Hildebrand JG (2002) Behavioral responses of adult tobacco hornworms, Manduca sexta, to hostplant volatiles change with age and mating status. J Insect Sci 2:5PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Rajapakse CNK, Walter GH, Moore CJ, Hull CD, Cribb BW (2006) Host recognition by a polyphagous lepidopteran (Helicoverpa armigera): primary host plants, host produced volatiles and neurosensory stimulation. Physiol Entomol 31:270–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rojas JC (1999) Influence of age, sex and mating status, egg load, prior exposure to mates, and time of day on host-finding behavior of Mamestra brassicae (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Environ Entomol 28:155–162Google Scholar
  23. SAS Institute Inc. (2005) SAS Online Doc® 9.1.3. Cary NC, SAS Institute, Inc.Google Scholar
  24. Schneider D (1957) Elektrophysiologische Untersuchungen von Chemo- und Mechanorezeptoren der Antenne des Seidenspinners. Z Vgl Physiol 40:8–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Städler E (1992) Behavioral responses of insects to plant secondary compounds. In: Rosenthal GA, Berenbaum MR (eds) Herbivores: their interactions with secondary plant metabolites, v II. Academic, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  26. Takken W, van Loon JJA, Adam W (2001) Inhibition of host-seeking response and olfactory responsiveness in Anopheles gambiae following blood feeding. J Insect Physiol 47:303–310PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Visser JH, Piron PGM (1998) An open Y-track olfactometer for recording aphid behavioural responses to plant odours. Proc Sect Exp Appl Entomol NEV Amsterdam 9:41–46Google Scholar
  28. Yang Z, Casado D, Ioriatti C, Bengstsson M, Witzgall P (2005) Pheromone pre-exposure and mating modulate codling moth response to host plant volatiles. Agric For Entomol 7:231–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Chemicals Affecting Insect Behavior Laboratory, Plant Sciences Institute, Agricultural Research ServiceUnited States Department of AgricultureBeltsvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations