Naturwissenschaften

, Volume 94, Issue 6, pp 483–487 | Cite as

To use or not to use torpor? Activity and body temperature as predictors

Short Communication

Abstract

When food is limited and/or environmental conditions are unfavourable, many mammals reduce activity and use torpor to save energy. Nevertheless, reliable predictors for torpor occurrence, especially in the wild, are currently not available. Interrelations between torpor use and other energy conserving strategies are also poorly understood. We tested the hypothesis that reductions in normothermic body temperature (T b) and the period of activity before torpor events could be used as predictors for torpor occurrence in sugar gliders, Petaurus breviceps (body mass, ∼125 g), known to display daily torpor in the wild. Occurrence of torpor was preceded by significant (∼10–25%) reductions of the duration of the activity phase. Moreover, the normothermic resting T b fell by an average of 1.2°C over 3 days before a torpor event, relative to individuals that did not display torpor. Our new findings suggest that before entering torpor, sugar gliders, which appear to use torpor as an emergency measure rather than a routine energy saving strategy, systematically reduce activity times and normothermic resting T bs to lower energy expenditure and perhaps to avoid employing torpor. Thus, reduced activity and normothermic T b may provide a predictive tool for the occurrence of daily torpor in the wild.

Keywords

Torpor Activity Body temperature Sugar glider Weather Marsupial 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Stuart Cairns for his help with the statistical analysis and comments on the text. We would also like to thank Frank Falkenstein, Nicola Goodship, Marco Wenzel and Wendy Westman for their help in the field. Permits for all animal experiments were provided by the New South Wales National Parks and Wildlife Service and the University of New England Animal Ethics Committee. This work was supported by an ARC grant awarded to FG.

References

  1. Bartholomew GA (1982) Body temperature and energy metabolism. In: Gordon MS, Bartholomew GA, Grinnell AD, Jørgensen CB, White FN (eds) Animal physiology: principles and adaptations. Macmillan, New York pp 333–406Google Scholar
  2. Brigham RM, Körtner G, Maddocks TA, Geiser F (2000) Seasonal use of torpor by free-ranging Australian owlet-nightjars (Aegotheles cristatus). Physiol Biochem Zool 73:613–620PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dawson TJ, May EL (1984) Daily variation in brain and body temperatures of the sugar glider (Petaurus breviceps): some insights into the control of thermoregulation. In: Smith AP, Hume ID (eds) Possums and gliders. Australian Mammal Society, Sydney pp 375–383Google Scholar
  4. Fleming MR (1980) Thermoregulation and torpor in the sugar glider, Petaurus breviceps (Marsupialia: Petauridae). Aust J Zool 28:521–534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Geiser F (2004) Metabolic rate and body temperature reduction during hibernation and daily torpor. Annu Rev Physiol 66:239–274PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Geiser F, Kenagy GJ (1990) Development of thermoregulation and torpor in the golden-mantled ground squirrel Spermophilus saturatus. J Mammal 71:286–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Holloway JC, Geiser F (2001) Seasonal changes in the thermoenergetics of the marsupial sugar glider, Petaurus breviceps. J Comp Physiol B 171:643–650PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Humphries MM, Thomas DW, Kramer DL (2003) The role of energy availability in mammalian hibernation: a cost–benefit approach. Physiol Biochem Zool 76:165–179PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Körtner G, Geiser F (1995) Effect of photoperiod and ambient temperature on activity patterns and body weight cycles of mountain pygmy-possums, Burramys parvus (Marsupialia). J Zool 235:311–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Körtner G, Geiser F (2000) Torpor and activity patterns in free-ranging sugar gliders Petaurus breviceps (Marsupialia). Oecologia 123:350–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lyman CP, Willis JS, Malan A, Wang LCH (eds) (1982) Hibernation and torpor in mammals and birds. Academic, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Ruf T, Klingenspor M, Preis H, Heldmaier G (1991) Daily torpor in the Djungarian hamster (Phodopus sungorus): interactions with food intake, activity and social behaviour. J Comp Physiol B 160:609–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Schleucher E (2004) Torpor in birds: taxonomy, energetics, and ecology. Physiol Biochem Zool 77:942–949PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Smith AP (1982) Diet and feeding strategies of the marsupial sugar glider in temperate Australia. J Anim Ecol 51:149–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Song X, Körtner G, Geiser F (1995) Reduction of metabolic rate and thermoregulation during daily torpor. J Comp Physiol B 165:291–297PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Speakman JR, Thomas DW (2003) Physiological ecology and energetics of bats. In: Kunz TH, Fenton BM (eds) Bat ecology. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London, pp 430–490Google Scholar
  17. Zar JH (1999) Biostatistical analysis. Prentice Hall International, New JerseyGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Behavioural Physiology and Ecology, ZoologyUniversity of New EnglandArmidaleAustralia

Personalised recommendations