Naturwissenschaften

, Volume 94, Issue 5, pp 412–415

House sparrows benefit from the conservation of white storks

  • Jakub Z. Kosicki
  • Tim H. Sparks
  • Piotr Tryjanowski
Short Communication

Abstract

As with many farmland bird species, the house sparrow Passer domesticus is declining in Europe, mainly due to intensification of agriculture reducing nest sites and food supplies. During 2002–2005, we studied the population size and nest site characteristics of house sparrows breeding within white stork Ciconia ciconia nests in a large area of agricultural landscape within western Poland. To explain sparrow density within stork nests, we examined characteristics of white stork nests (position, age, productivity) and the farm type around the nest. House sparrow density was greatest in the longest established (and hence larger) white stork nests located on traditionally managed farms. Two recent changes appear to have adverse effects on house sparrows. The first is the intensification of farming and the second is active management of white stork nests on electric poles to reduce nest size and thus avoid both disruption to the electrical supply and electrocution of white storks. Because the white stork has such a high profile in Poland, there are numerous schemes to conserve and enhance this species. In conclusion, we clearly show that protecting one species can have valuable, although unplanned, benefits to another species of conservation interest, the house sparrow.

Keywords

House sparrow White stork Conservation 

References

  1. Bocheński M (2005) Nesting of the sparrows Passer spp. in the white stork Ciconia ciconia nests in a stork colony in Kłopot (W Poland). Int Stud Sparrows 30:39–41Google Scholar
  2. Hole DG, Whittingham MJ, Bradbury RB, Anderson GQA, Lee PLM, Wilson JD, Krebs JR (2002) Widespread local house-sparrow extinctions. Nature 418:931–932PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Indykiewicz P (1991) Nests and nest-site of the house sparrow Passer domesticus (Linnaeus, 1758) in urban, suburban and rural environments. Acta Zool Cracov 34:475–495Google Scholar
  4. Indykiewicz P (1998) Breeding of house sparrows Passer domesticus, tree sparrow P. montanus, and starling Sturnus vulgaris in the white stork Ciconia ciconia nests. Not Ornitol 39:97–104 (In Polish)Google Scholar
  5. Kulczycki A, Mazur-Gierasińska M (1968) Nesting of house sparrow Passer domesticus (Linnaeus 1758). Acta Zool Cracov 9:231–255Google Scholar
  6. Kuźniak S (1994) The white stork Ciconia ciconia in the Leszno province in 1974–1990. Pr Zak Biol Ekol Ptaków Uniw im Adama Mickiewicza Pozn 3:69–89Google Scholar
  7. Mitschke A, Rathje H, Baumung S (2000) House sparrows in Hamburg: population, habitat choice and threats. Hamb Avifaunist Beitr 30:129–204Google Scholar
  8. Muzinic J, Cvitan I (2001) Choice of nest platform material for the white stork (Ciconia ciconia). Isr J Zool 47:167–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Pinowski J, Barkowska M, Kruszewicz AH, Kruszewicz AG (1994) The causes of the mortality of eggs and nestlings of Passer spp. J Biosci 19:441–451Google Scholar
  10. Profus P (1986) Zur Brutbiologie und Bioenergetik des Weißstorchs in Polen. Beih Verőff Naturschutz Landschaftspflege Baden-Württemberg 43:205–220Google Scholar
  11. Ringsby TH, Sæther BE, Solberg EJ (1998) Factors affecting juvenile survival in house sparrow Passer domesticus. J Avian Biol 29:241–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Robinson RA, Sieriwardena GM, Crick HQP (2005) Size and trends of house sparrow Passer domesticus population in Great Britain. Ibis 147:552–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Saumel DE (1969) House sparrow occupancy of cliff swallow nests. Wilson Bulletin 81:103–104Google Scholar
  14. Schulz H (1998) Ciconia ciconia white stork. BWP Updat 2:69–105Google Scholar
  15. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1995) Biometry. Freeman, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Summers-Smith JD (1963) The house sparrow. Collins, LondonGoogle Scholar
  17. Summers-Smith JD (2003) The decline of the house sparrow: a review. Br Birds 96:439–446Google Scholar
  18. Tortosa FS, Villafuerte F (1999) Effect of nest microclimate on effective endothermy in white stork Ciconia ciconia nestlings. Bird Study 46:336–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Tryjanowski P, Kuczyński L (1999) Shifting from outdoor to indoor breeding: house martin’s (Delichon urbica) defence against house sparrow (Passer domesticus). Folia Zool 48:101–106Google Scholar
  20. Tryjanowski P, Sparks TH, Profus P (2005) Uphill shifts in the distribution of the white stork Ciconia ciconia in southern Poland: the importance of nest quality. Divers Distrib 11:219–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Watzold F, Schwerdtner K (2005) Why be wasteful when preserving a valuable resource? A review article on the cost-effectiveness of European biodiversity conservation policy. Biol Conserv 123:327–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Vaclav R, Hoi H (2002) Importance of colony size and breeding synchrony on behaviour, reproductive success and paternity in house sparrows Passer domesticus. Folia Zool 51:35–48Google Scholar
  23. Vincent KE (2005) Investigating the causes of the decline of the urban house sparrow Passer domesticus population in Britain. PhD thesis, De Montfort UniversityGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jakub Z. Kosicki
    • 1
  • Tim H. Sparks
    • 2
  • Piotr Tryjanowski
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Behavioural EcologyAdam Mickiewicz UniversityPoznanPoland
  2. 2.NERC Centre for Ecology and HydrologyHuntingdonUK

Personalised recommendations