, Volume 94, Issue 4, pp 280–287

Winged queens replaced by reproductives smaller than workers in Mystrium ants

  • Mathieu Molet
  • Christian Peeters
  • Brian L. Fisher
Original Article


In ants, winged queens that are specialized for independent colony foundation can be replaced by wingless reproductives better adapted for colony fission. We studied this shift in reproductive strategy by comparing two Mystrium species from Madagascar using morphometry, allometry and dissections. Mystrium rogeri has a single dealate queen in each colony with a larger thorax than workers and similar mandibles that allow these queens to hunt during non-claustral foundation. In contrast, Mystrium ‘red’ lacks winged queens and half of the female adults belong to a wingless ‘intermorph’ caste smaller and allometrically distinct from the workers. Intermorphs have functional ovaries and spermatheca while those of workers are degenerate. Intermorphs care for brood and a few mate and reproduce making them an all-purpose caste that takes charge of both work and reproduction. However, their mandibles are reduced and inappropriate for hunting centipedes, unlike the workers’ mandibles. This together with their small thorax disallow them to perform independent colony foundation, and colonies reproduce by fission. M. rogeri workers have mandibles polymorphic in size and shape, which allow for all tasks from brood care to hunting. In M. ‘red’, colonial investment in reproduction has shifted from producing expensive winged queens to more numerous helpers. M. ‘red’ intermorphs are the first case of reproductives smaller than workers in ants and illustrate their potential to diversify their caste system for better colonial economy.


Intermorph Morphology Caste Reproduction Allometry 


  1. Billen J (1982) Ovariole development in workers of Formica sanguinea Latr. (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Insectes Soc 29:86–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brown MJF, Bonhoeffer S (2003) On the evolution of claustral colony founding in ants. Evol Ecol Res 305–313Google Scholar
  3. Fairbairn DJ (1997) Allometry for sexual size dimorphism: pattern and process in the coevolution of body size in males and females. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 28:659–687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fisher BL (1997) Biogeography and ecology of the ant fauna of Madagascar (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). J Nat Hist 31:269–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gobin B, Ito F, Peeters C, Billen J (2006) Queen–worker differences in spermatheca reservoir of phylogenetically basal ants. Cell Tissue Res 326:169–178PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gotwald WH Jr (1995) Army ants: the biology of social predation. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Gronenberg W, Hölldobler B, Alpert GD (1998) Jaws that snap: control of mandible movements in the ant Mystrium. J Insect Physiol 44:241–253PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Harrison RG (1980) Dispersal polymorphisms in insects. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 11:95–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Haskins CP, Haskins EF (1951) Note on the method of colony foundation of the ponerine ant Amblyopone australis Erichson. Am Midl Nat 45:432–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Heinze J (1998) Intercastes, intermorphs, and ergatoid queens: who is who in ant reproduction? Insectes Soc 45:113–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Heinze J, Buschinger A (1989) Queen polymorphism in Leptothorax sp. A: its genetic and ecological background (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Insectes Soc 36:139–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Heinze J, Hölldobler B (1995) Thelytokous parthenogenesis and dominance hierarchies in the ponerine ant, Platythyrea punctata. Naturwissenschaften 82:40–41Google Scholar
  13. Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (1990) The ants. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  14. Kaspari M, O’Donnell S (2003) High rates of army ant raids in the Neotropics and implications for ant colony and community structure. Evol Ecol Res 5:933–939Google Scholar
  15. Lévieux J (1972) Comportement d’alimentation et relations entre les individus chez une fourmi primitive, Amblyopone pluto Gotwald et Lévieux. Comptes rendu hedomadaire Séance Acadamie des Sciences, Paris 275:483–485Google Scholar
  16. Myles TG, Nutting WL (1988) Termite eusocial evolution: a re-examination of Bartz’s hypothesis and assumptions. Q Rev Biol 63:1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ohkawara K, Ito F, Higashi S (1993) Production and reproductive function of intercastes in Myrmecina graminicola nipponica colonies (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Insectes Soc 40:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Pamilo P (1991) Evolution of colony characteristics in social insects. I. Sex allocation. Am Nat 137:83–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Passera L, Keller L (1990) Loss of mating flight and shift in the pattern of carbohydrate storage in sexuals of ants (Hymenoptera; Formicidae). J Comp Physiol B 160:207–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Peeters C (1991) Ergatoid queens and intercastes in ants: two distinct adult forms which look morphologically intermediate between workers and winged queens. Insectes Soc 38:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Peeters C (1997) Morphologically ‘primitive’ ants: comparative review of social characters, and the importance of queen–worker dimorphism. In: Choe JC, Crespi BJ (eds) The evolution of social behavior in insects and arachnids. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp372–391Google Scholar
  22. Peeters C, Ito F (2001) Colony dispersal and the evolution of queen morphology in social Hymenoptera. Annu Rev Entomol 46:601–630PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Peeters C, Liebig J, Hölldobler B (2000) Sexual reproduction by both queens and workers in the ponerine ant Harpegnathos saltator. Insectes Soc 47:325–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Roff DA (1990) The evolution of flightlessness in insects. Ecol Monogr 60:389–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ward PS (1983) Genetic relatedness and colony organization in a species complex of ponerine ants. I. Genotypic and phenotypic composition of colonies. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 12:285–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Warton DI, Weber NC (2002) Common slope tests for bivariate errors-in-variables models. Biom J 44:161–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wheeler WM (1922) Ants of the American Museum Congo expedition. A contribution to the myrmecology of Africa. I. On the distribution of the ants of the Ethiopian and Malagasy regions. Bull Am Mus Nat Hist 45:13–37Google Scholar
  28. Wheeler DE, Martínez T (1995) Storage proteins in ants (Hymenoptera:Formicidae). Comp Biochem Physiol B 112:15–19PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mathieu Molet
    • 1
  • Christian Peeters
    • 1
  • Brian L. Fisher
    • 2
  1. 1.Laboratoire d’Ecologie CNRS UMR 7625Université Pierre et Marie CurieParisFrance
  2. 2.Department of EntomologyCalifornia Academy of SciencesSan FranciscoUSA

Personalised recommendations