, Volume 94, Issue 3, pp 218–222 | Cite as

Floral odor learning within the hive affects honeybees’ foraging decisions

  • Andrés Arenas
  • Vanesa M. Fernández
  • Walter M. Farina
Short Communication


Honeybees learn odor cues quickly and efficiently when visiting rewarding flowers. Memorization of these cues facilitates the localization and recognition of food sources during foraging flights. Bees can also use information gained inside the hive during social interactions with successful foragers. An important information cue that can be learned during these interactions is food odor. However, little is known about how floral odors learned in the hive affect later decisions of foragers in the field. We studied the effect of food scent on foraging preferences when this learning is acquired directly inside the hive. By using in-hive feeders that were removed 24 h before the test, we showed that foragers use the odor information acquired during a 3-day stimulation period with a scented solution during a food-choice situation outside the nest. This bias in food preference is maintained even 24 h after the replacement of all the hive combs. Thus, without being previously collected outside by foragers, food odors learned within the hive can be used during short-range foraging flights. Moreover, correct landings at a dual-choice device after replacing the storing combs suggests that long-term memories formed within the colony can be retrieved while bees search for food in the field.


Apis mellifera Associative learning Olfactory experiences Information transfer Foraging choice 



We are indebted to C. Grüter and R. Josens for their valuable comments and suggestions on an early version of this manuscript. We thank also C. Grüter for helping us with the English and G. Ramirez and H. Verna for technical assistance. This study was supported by funds from Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica (01-12319), Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (02049), and the University of Buenos Aires (X 036) to WMF. We declare that our experiments comply with the current laws of the country in which they were performed.


  1. Bitterman ME, Menzel R, Fietz A, Schafer S (1983) Classical-conditioning of proboscis extension in honeybees (Apis mellifera). J Comp Psychol 97:107–119PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chaffiol A, Laloi D, Pham-Delègue M (2005) Prior classical olfactory conditioning improves odour-cued flight orientation of honey bees in a wind tunnel. J Exp Biol 208:3731–3737PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dornhaus A, Chittka L (1999) Evolutionary origins of bee dances. Nature 401:38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Farina WM, Grüter C, Diaz PC (2005) Social learning of floral odours inside the honeybee hive. Proc R Soc Lond B 272:1923–1928CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Farina, WM, Grüter C, Acosta LE, Mc Cabe S (2006) Honeybees learn floral odors while receiving nectar from foragers within the hive. Naturwissenschaften DOI 10.1007/s00114-006-0157-3
  6. Free JB (1969) Influence of the odour of a honeybee colony’s food stores on the behaviour of its foragers. Nature 222:778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gil M, De Marco RJ (2006) Apis mellifera bees acquire long-term olfactory memories within the colony. Biol Lett 2:98–100PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Grüter C, Acosta LE, Farina WM (2006) Propagation of olfactory information within the honeybee hive. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 60:707–715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jakobsen HB, Kristjánsson K, Rohde B, Terkildsen M, Olsen CE (1995) Can social bees be influenced to choose a specific feeding station by adding the scent of the station to the hive air? J Chem Ecol 21(11):1635–1648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Johnson DL, Wenner AM (1966) A relationship between conditioning and communication in honeybees. Anim Behav 14:261–265PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Knudsen JT, Tollsten L, Bergström LG (1993) Floral scents: a checklist of volatile compounds isolated by head-space techniques. Phytochemistry 33:253–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Menzel R (1999) Memory dynamics in the honeybee. J Comp Physiol A 185:323–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Reinhard J, Srinivasan MV, Guez D, Zhang SW (2004) Floral scents induce recall of navigational and visual memories in honeybees. J Exp Biol 207:4371–4381PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ribbands CR (1954) Communication between honeybees: the response of crop-attached bees to the scent of their crop. Proc R Entomol Soc Lond A 29:141–144Google Scholar
  15. Ribbands CR (1955) The scent language of honey bees. Ann Rev Smithson Inst 368–377Google Scholar
  16. Riley JR, Greggers U, Smith AD, Reynolds DR, Menzel R (2005) The flight paths of honeybees recruited by the waggle dance. Nature 435:205–207PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Seeley TD (1995) The wisdom of the hive: the social physiology of honey bee colonies. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  18. von Frisch K (1923) Über die Sprache der Bienen. Zool Jb Physiol 40:1–186Google Scholar
  19. von Frisch K (1967) The dance language and orientation of bees. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  20. Wenner AM, Wells PH, Johnson DL (1969) Honey bee recruitment to food sources: olfaction or language? Science 164:84–86PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Zar JH (1999) Biostatistical analysis. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrés Arenas
    • 1
  • Vanesa M. Fernández
    • 1
  • Walter M. Farina
    • 1
  1. 1.Departamento de Biodiversidad y Biología Experimental, IFIBYNE-CONICET, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y NaturalesUniversidad de Buenos AiresBuenos AiresArgentina

Personalised recommendations