, Volume 94, Issue 1, pp 65–70 | Cite as

Taphonomic evidence for high-speed adapted fins in thunniform ichthyosaurs

  • Theagarten Lingham-Soliar
  • Gerhard Plodowski
Short Communication


Ichthyosaurs have been compared with the fast-swimming thunniform groups of marine vertebrates, tuna, lamnid sharks, and dolphins, based on similarity of shape of the body and locomotory organs. In addition to shape, high-tensile stiffness of the control surfaces has been shown to be essential in maximizing hydrodynamic efficiency in extant thunniform swimmers. To date, there has been no evidence of a stiffening support system for the dorsal fin and dorsal lobe of the caudal fin in ichthyosaurs, the sole stiffening structure of the ventral lobe being an extension of the vertebral column along its leading edge. Stenopterygius SMF 457 is arguably the best soft-tissue preserved ichthyosaur specimen known. Here, we examine soft-tissue preservation in this specimen in the control surfaces and provide the first evidence of a complex architecture of stiff fibers in the dorsal and caudal fins. We find by comparisons and by analogy that these fibers provided a remarkable mechanism for high tensile stiffness and efficiency of the locomotory organs virtually identical to that of the great white shark, Carcharodon carcharias. It is the first mechanostructural study of the control surfaces of a Jurassic ichthyosaur that adds essential evidence in support of the view that these forms were high-speed thunniform swimmers.


Ichthyosaur soft-tissue preservations Fiber architecture Caudal and dorsal fins Tensile stiffness Swimming efficiency 



The authors thank S. Traenkner and Jutta Oelkers-Schaefer for the photographic and technical assistance.


  1. Briggs DEG (2003) The role of decay and mineralization in the preservation of soft bodied fossils. Annu Rev Earth Planet Sci 31:275–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Clark RB, Cowey JB (1958) Factors controlling the change of shape of certain nemertean and turbellarian worms. J Exp Biol 35:731–748Google Scholar
  3. Drucker EG, Lauder GV (2001) Locomotor function of the dorsal fin in teleost fishes: experimental analysis of wake forces in sunfish. J Exp Biol 204:2943–2958PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Feduccia A, Lingham-Soliar T, Hinchcliffe JR (2005) Do feathered dinosaurs exist? Testing the hypothesis on neontological and paleontological evidence. J Morphol 266(2):125–166PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ferry LA, Lauder GV (1996) Heterocercal tail function in leopard sharks: a three-dimensional kinematic analysis of two models. J Exp Biol 199:2253–2268PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Grove AJ, Newell GE (1936) A mechanical investigation into the effectual action of the caudal fin of some aquatic chordates. Ann Mag Nat Hist 17:280–290Google Scholar
  7. Lighthill J (1975) Mathematical biofluid dynamics. SIAM, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  8. Lingham-Soliar T (1999) Rare soft tissue preservation showing fibrous structures in an ichthyosaur from the Lower Lias (Jurassic) of England. Proc R Soc Lond B 266:2367–2373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lingham-Soliar T (2001) The ichthyosaur integument: skin fibers, a means for a strong, flexible and smooth skin. Lethaia 34:287–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lingham-Soliar T (2003) Extinction of ichthyosaurs: a catastrophic or evolutionary paradigm? Neues Jahrb Geol Paläontol Abh 228:421–452Google Scholar
  11. Lingham-Soliar T (2005a) Dorsal fin in the white shark Carcharodon carcharias: a dynamic stabilizer for fast swimming. J Morphol 263:1–11PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lingham-Soliar T (2005b) Caudal fin allometry in the white shark Carcharodon carcharias: implications for locomotory performance and ecology. Naturwissenschaften 92:231–236PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lingham-Soliar T (2005c) Caudal fin in the white shark, Carcharodon carcharias (Lamnidae): a dynamic propeller for fast, efficient swimming. J Morphol 264:233–252PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Martill DM (1993) Soupy substrates: a medium for the exceptional preservation of ichthyosaurs of the Posidonia Shale (Lower Jurassic) of Germany. Kaupia 2:77–97Google Scholar
  15. Martill DM (1995) An ichthyosaur with preserved soft tissue from the Sinemurian of southern England. Palaeontology 38:897–903Google Scholar
  16. Motta PJ (1977) Anatomy and functional morphology of dermal collagen fibers in sharks. Copeia 1977:454–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Naresh MD, Arumugam V, Sanjeevi R (1997) Mechanical behaviour of shark skin. J Biosci 22:431–437Google Scholar
  18. Neville AC, Luke BM (1969) Model for chitin–protein complexes in insect cuticle. Tissue Cell 1:689–707Google Scholar
  19. Pabst DA (2000) To bend a dolphin: convergence of force transmission designs in cetaceans and scombrid fishes. Am Zool 40:146–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Wainwright SA, Biggs WD, Currey JD, Gosline JM (1976) Mechanical design in organisms. E Arnold, LondonGoogle Scholar
  21. Wainwright SA, Vosburgh F, Hebrank JH (1978) Shark skin: function in locomotion. Science 202:747–749CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Biological and Conservation SciencesUniversity of KwaZulu-NatalDurbanSouth Africa
  2. 2.Forschungsinstitut SenckenbergFrankfurt am MainGermany

Personalised recommendations