Advertisement

Naturwissenschaften

, Volume 94, Issue 1, pp 39–42 | Cite as

A male gift to its partner? Cyanogenic glycosides in the spermatophore of longwing butterflies (Heliconius)

  • Márcio Zikán Cardoso
  • Lawrence E. Gilbert
Short Communication

Abstract

Males of several insect species transfer nuptial gifts to females during mating, typically in the form of a protein-rich spermatophore. In chemically defended species, males could potentially enhance such a gift with chemicals that help protect the female, her eggs, or both. This was shown for lepidopteran species that accumulate pyrrolizidine alkaloids. Most Heliconius butterflies are presumably protected from predators by virtue of de novo synthesized and/or sequestered cyanogenic glycosides. Males of Heliconius species are known to transfer nutritional gifts to the females but whether defensive chemicals could also be transferred is not known. To ascertain whether transfer of cyanogens occurs, we dissected freshly mated females from nine different Heliconius species and analyzed spermatophores for cyanogenic glycosides. We found cyanogens in the spermatophores of all nine species. This is the first time cyanogenic glycosides are reported in the spermatophores of arthropods. We discuss the implications of these findings for Heliconius biology and for other cyanogenic insects as well. We suggest that chemically defended species commonly lace their nuptial gifts with defensive chemicals to improve gift quality.

Keywords

Nuptial gifts Spermatophore Heliconius Cyanogenic glycoside 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Thanks to Carol Boggs for supplying the H. charithonia specimens; Krushnameh Kunte and three anonymous referees for comments and suggestions on the manuscript; Phil Schappert and Helene Engler for helping in the colorimetric analysis; CAPES (Brazil) for MZC’s doctoral fellowship, NSF for grants, which provided greenhouse facilities (DEB 790633 and 8315399-LEG); MINAE, SINAC (Costa Rica), and IBAMA (Brazil) for collection permits; and USDA APHIS for importation permits. The experiments comply with the current laws of the United States.

References

  1. Arnqvist G, Nilsson T (2000) The evolution of polyandry: multiple mating and female fitness in insects. Anim Behav 60:145–164PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boggs CL (1995) Male nuptial gifts: phenotypic consequences and evolutionary explanations. In: Leather SR, Hardie J (eds) Insect reproduction. CRC Press, New York, pp 215–242Google Scholar
  3. Boyden TC (1976) Butterfly palatability and mimicry: experiments with Ameiva lizards. Evolution 30:73–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brinker AM, Seigler DS (1989) Methods for the detection and quantitative determination of cyanide in plant materials. Phytochem Bull 21:24–31Google Scholar
  5. Brown KS Jr (1984) Adult-obtained pyrrolizidine alkaloids defend ithomiine butterflies against a spider predator. Nature 309:707–709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chai P (1990) Relationships between visual characteristics of rainforest butterflies and responses of a specialized insectivorous bird. In: Wickstein M (ed) Adaptive coloration in invertebrates. Texas A&M University Press, College Station, USA, pp 31–60Google Scholar
  7. Drummond BA (1984) Multiple matings and sperm competition in the Lepidoptera. In: Smith RL (ed) Sperm competition and the evolution of animal mating systems. Academic, London, pp 291–370Google Scholar
  8. Dussourd DE, Ubik K, Harvis C, Resch J, Meinwald J, Eisner T (1988) Biparental defensive endowment of eggs with acquired plant alkaloid in the moth Utetheisa ornatrix. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85:5992–5996PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dussourd DE, Harvis CA, Meinwald J, Eisner T (1989) Paternal allocation of sequestered plant pyrrolizidine alkaloid to eggs in the danaine butterfly, Danaus gillipus. Experientia 45:896–898PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Engler HS, Spencer KC, Gilbert LE (2000) Insect metabolism: preventing cyanide release from leaves. Nature 406:144–145PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lambert JL, Ramasamy J, Paukstelis JV (1975) Stable reagents for the colorimetric determination of cyanide by modified Konig reactions. Anal Chem 47:916–918CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. LaMunyon CW (1997) Increased fecundity, as a function of multiple mating, in an arctiid moth, Utetheisa ornatrix. Ecol Entomol 22:69–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Muhtasib H, Evans DL (1987) Linamarine and histamine in the defensive secretion of Zygaena filipendulae. J Chem Ecol 13:133–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Nahrstedt A, Davis RH (1983) Occurrence, variation and biosynthesis of the cyanogenic glucosides linamarin and lotaustralin in species of the Heliconiini (Insecta: Lepidoptera). Comp Biochem Physiol B 75:65–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Nahrstedt A, Davis RH (1985) Biosynthesis and quantitative relationships of the cyanogenic glucosides, linamarin and lotaustralin, in genera of the Heliconiini (Insecta: Lepidoptera). Comp Biochem Physiol B 82:745–749CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Oberhauser KS (1989) Effects of spermatophores on male and female monarch butterfly reproductive success. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 25:237–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Penz C (1999) Higher level phylogeny for the passion-vine butterflies (Nymphalidae, Heliconiinae) based on early stage and adult morphology. Zool J Linn Soc 127:277–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rammert U (1992) The reaction of birds to the larval defensive system of Zygaena trifolii (Esper, 1783) (Lepidoptera: Zygaenidae). In: Dutreix C, Naumann C, Tremewan W (eds) Recent advances in Burnet moth research. Koeltz Scientific Books, Koenigstein, pp 38–52Google Scholar
  19. Schappert PJ, Shore JS (1995) Cyanogenesis in Turnera ulmifolia L. (Turneraceae). I. Phenotypic distribution and genetic variation for cyanogenesis on Jamaica. Heredity 74:392–404Google Scholar
  20. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry, 2nd edn. WH Freeman, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Torres-Vila LM, Jennions MD (2005) Male mating history and female fecundity in the Lepidoptera: do male virgins make better partners? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 57:318–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Wiklund C (2003) Sexual selection and the evolution of butterfly mating systems. In: Boggs CL, Watt WB, Ehrlich PR (eds) Butterflies: ecology and evolution taking flight. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 67–90Google Scholar
  23. Zagrobelny M, Bak S, Rasmussen AV, Jørgensen B, Naumann CM, Møller BL (2004) Cyanogenic glucosides and plant–insect interaction. Phytochemistry 65:293–306PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departamento de Botânica, Ecologia e Zoologia, Centro de BiociênciasUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do NorteRio Grande do NorteBrazil
  2. 2.Section of Integrative BiologyUniversity of TexasAustinUSA

Personalised recommendations