Naturwissenschaften

, Volume 93, Issue 10, pp 506–510

Aphid egg protection by ants: a novel aspect of the mutualism between the tree-feeding aphid Stomaphis hirukawai and its attendant ant Lasius productus

Short Communication

Abstract

Aphids often form mutualistic associations with ants, in which the aphids provide the ants with honeydew and the ants defend the aphids from predators. In this paper, we report aphid egg protection by ants as a novel aspect of the deeply interdependent relationship between a tree-feeding aphid and its attendant ant. The ant Lasius productus harbours oviparous females, males, and eggs of the hinoki cypress-feeding aphid Stomaphis hirukawai in its nests in winter. We investigated the behaviour of ants kept with aphid eggs in petri dishes to examine whether the ants recognise the aphid eggs and tend them or only provide a refuge for the aphids. Workers carried almost all of the aphid eggs into the nest within 24 h. The ants indiscriminately tended aphid eggs collected from their own colonies and those from other ant colonies. The ants cleaned the eggs and piled them up in the nest, and egg tending by ants dramatically increased aphid egg survival rates. Starving the ants showed no significant effect on aphid egg survivorship. Without ants, aphid eggs were rapidly killed by fungi. These results suggested that grooming by the ants protected the aphid eggs, at least, against pathogenic fungi. This hygienic service afforded by the ants seems indispensable for egg survival of these aphids in an environment rich in potentially pathogenic microorganisms.

Keywords

Ant–aphid mutualism Symbiosis Myrmecophiles Egg protection 

Supplementary material

Video file (WMV 2,453 kb)

References

  1. Forbes (1906) The corn root-aphis and its attendant ant. (Aphis maidi-radicis Forbes and Lasius niger L., var. americanus Emery). Bull USDA Div Entomol 60:29–39Google Scholar
  2. Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (1990) The ants. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  3. Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (1994) Journey to the ants: a story of scientific exploration. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  4. Hopkins GW, Thacker JI (1999) Ants and habitat specificity in aphids. J Insect Conserv 3:25–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Matsuura K (2003) Symbionts affecting termite behaviour. In: Miller TA, Bourtzis K (eds) Insect symbiosis. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp 131–143Google Scholar
  6. Matsuura K (2006) Termite-egg mimicry by a sclerotium-forming fungus. Proc R Soc Lond B 273:1203–1209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Matsuura K, Tanaka C, Nishida T (2000) Symbiosis of a termite and a sclerotium-forming fungus: Sclerotia mimic termite eggs. Ecol Res 15:405–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Park IK, Lee SG, Choi DH, Park JD, Ahn YJ (2003) Insecticidal activities of constituents identified in the essential oil from leaves of Chamaecyparis obtusa against Callosobruchus chinensis (L.) and Sitophilus oryzae (L.). J Stored Prod Res 39:375–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Phillips ID, Willis CKR (2005) Defensive behavior of ants in a mutualistic relationship with aphids. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 59:321–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Pierce NE, Braby MF, Heath A, Lohman DJ, Mathew J, Rand DB, Travassos MA (2002) The ecology and evolution of ant association in the Lycaenidae (Lepidoptera). Annu Rev Entomol 47:733–771PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Pontin AJ (1960) Observations on the keeping of aphid eggs by ants of the genus Lasius (Hym., Formicidae). Entomol Mon Mag 96:198–199Google Scholar
  12. Shingleton AW, Stern DL, Foster WA (2005) The origin of a mutualism: a trait promoting the evolution of ant–aphid mutualisms. Evolution 59:921–926PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Sorin M (1995) Two new species and hitherto unknown sexual morphs of the genus Stomaphis Walker (Homoptera, Aphididae) from Japan. Bulletin of Kogakkan University 33:145–163Google Scholar
  14. Stadler B, Dixon AFG (2005) Ecology and evolution of aphid–ant interactions. Ann Rev Ecolog Syst 36:345–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Stadler B, Kindlmann P, Smilauer P, Fiedler K (2003) A comparative analysis of morphological and ecological characters of European aphids and lycaenids in relation to ant attendance. Oecologia 135:422–430PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratory of Insect Ecology, Graduate School of Environmental ScienceOkayama UniversityOkayamaJapan

Personalised recommendations