Naturwissenschaften

, Volume 92, Issue 12, pp 586–591

Osteological evidence for sister group relationship between pseudo-toothed birds (Aves: Odontopterygiformes) and waterfowls (Anseriformes)

Short Communication

Abstract

The phylogenetic affinities of the extinct pseudo-toothed birds have remained controversial. Some authors noted that they resemble both pelicans and allies (Pelecaniformes) and tube-nosed birds (Procellariiformes), but assigned them to a distinct taxon, the Odontopterygiformes. In most recent studies, the pseudo-toothed birds are referred to the family Pelagornithidae inside the Pelecaniformes. Here, I perform a cladistic analysis with five taxa of the pseudo-toothed birds including two undescribed new species from the Early Tertiary of Morocco. The present hypothesis strongly supports a sister group relationship of pseudo-toothed birds (Odontopterygiformes) and waterfowls (Anseriformes). The Odontoanserae (Odontopterygiformes plus Anseriformes) are the sister group of Neoaves. The placement of the landfowls (Galliformes) as the sister taxon of all other neognathous birds does not support the consensus view that the Galloanserae (Galliformes plus Anseriformes) are monophyletic.

Supplementary material

114_2005_47_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (49 kb)
(PDF 51 kb)
114_2005_47_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (11 kb)
(PDF 12 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Averianov AO, Panteleyev AV, Potapova OR, Nessov LA (1991) Bony-toothed birds (Aves: Pelecaniformes: Odontopterygia) from the Late Paleocene and Eocene of the western margin of Ancient Asia. Proc Zool Inst USSR Acad Sci 239:3–12Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bams RA (1956) On the relation between the attachment of jaw muscles and the surface of the skull in Podiceps cristatus L., with some notes on the mechanical properties of this part of the head: I–IV. Proc K Ned Akad Wet C 59:82–101; 248–262Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Barnikol A (1952) Korrelationen in der Ausgestaltung der Schädelform bei Vögeln. Morph Jahrb 92:373–414Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Barnikol A (1953) Vergleichend anatomische und taxonomisch phylogenetische Studien am Kopf der Opisthocomiformes, Musophagidae, Galli, Columbae und Cuculi. Ein Beitrag zum Opisthocomus-Problem. Zool Jahrb Syst 81:487–526Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Baumel JJ, King AS, Breazile JE, Evans HE, Vanden Berge JC (eds) (1993) Handbook of avian anatomy: nomina anatomica avium. Nuttall Ornithological Club, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Baumel JJ, Witmer LM (1993) Osteologia. In: Baumel JJ, King AS, Breazile JE, Evans HE, Vanden Berge JC (eds) Handbook of avian anatomy: nomina anatomica avium, vol 23. Publ Nuttall Ornithol Club, pp 45–132Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bourdon E, Bouya B, Iarochène M (2005) Earliest African neornithine bird: a new species of Prophaethontidae (Aves) from the Paleocene of Morocco. J Vertebr Paleontol 25:157–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bremer K (1994) Branch support and tree stability. Cladistics 10:295–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Brodkorb P, Mourer-Chauviré C (1982) Fossil anhingas (Aves: Anhingidae) from early man sites of Hadar and Omo (Ethiopia) and Olduvai Gorge (Tanzania). Geobios 15:505–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chubb AL (2004) New nuclear evidence for the oldest divergence among neognath birds: the phylogenetic utility of ZENK. Mol Phylogenet Evol 30:140–151CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cracraft J (1968) The lacrimal–ectethmoid complex in birds: a single character analysis. Am Midl Nat 80:316–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cracraft J (1982) Phylogenetic relationships and monophyly of loons, grebes, and hesperornithiform birds, with comments on the early history of birds. Syst Zool 31:35–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cracraft J (1985) Monophyly and phylogenetic relationships of the Pelecaniformes: a numerical cladistic analysis. Auk 102:834–853Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cracraft J (1988) The major clades of birds. In: Benton MJ (ed) The phylogeny and classification of the tetrapods, vol 1: amphibians, reptiles, birds. Clarendon, Oxford, pp 339–361Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cracraft J, Barker FK, Braun M, Harshman J, Dyke GJ, Feinstein J, Stanley S, Cibois A, Schikler P, Beresford P, García-Moreno J, Sorenson MD, Yuri T, Mindell DP (2004) Phylogenetic relationships among modern birds (Neornithes): towards an avian tree of life. In: Cracraft J, Donoghue MJ (eds) Assembling the tree of life. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 468–489Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cracraft J, Clarke J (2001) The basal clades of modern birds. In: Gauthier J, Gall LF (eds) New perspectives on the origin and early evolution of birds. Peabody Museum of Natural History, New Haven, CT, pp 143–156Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Duijm M (1951) On the head posture in birds and its relation to some anatomical features: I–II. Proc K Ned Akad Wet C 54:202–211; 260–271Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dullemeijer P (1951) The correlation between muscle system and skull structure in Phalacrocorax carbo sinensis (Shaw & Nodder): I–III. Proc K Ned Akad Wet C 54:247–259; 400–404; 533–536Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dzerzhinsky FY (1995) Evidence for common ancestry of the Galliformes and Anseriformes. Cour ForschInst Senckenb 181:325–336Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Elzanowski A (1987) Cranial and eyelid muscles and ligaments of the tinamous (Aves: Tinamiformes). Zool Jahrb Anat 116:63–118Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ericson PGP (1997) Systematic relationships of the palaeogene family Presbyornithidae (Aves: Anseriformes). Zool J Linn Soc 121:429–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ericson PGP, Parsons TJ, Johansson US (2001) Morphological and molecular support for nonmonophyly of the Galloanseres. In: Gauthier J, Gall LF (eds) New perspectives on the origin and early evolution of birds. Peabody Museum of Natural History, New Haven, CT, pp 157–168Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Eriksson T (2001) AutoDecay (program distributed by the author), version 5.0. Bergius Foundation, Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Fain MG, Houde P (2004) Parallel radiations in the primary clades of birds. Evolution 58:2558–2573PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gheerbrant E, Sudre J, Cappetta H, Mourer-Chauviré C, Bourdon E, Iarochène M, Amaghzaz M, Bouya B (2003) Les localités à mammifères des carrières de Grand Daoui, bassin des Ouled Abdoun, Maroc, Yprésien: premier état des lieux. Bull Soc Géol Fr 174:279–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Goedert JL (1989) Giant Late Eocene marine birds (Pelecaniformes: Pelagornithidae) from northwestern Oregon. J Paleontol 63:939–944Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    González-Barba G, Scwennicke T, Goedert JL, Barnes LG (2002) Earliest Pacific Basin record of the Pelagornithidae (Aves: Pelecaniformes). J Vertebr Paleontol 22:722–725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Groth JG, Barrowclough GF (1999) Basal divergences in birds and the phylogenetic utility of the nuclear RAG-1 gene. Mol Phylogenet Evol 12:115–123CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Harrison CJO (1976) The tendinal canals of the hypotarsi as a taxonomic character of water birds. Bull Br Ornithol Club 96:82–88Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Harrison CJO (1977) The limb osteology of the diving petrels and the little auk as evidence of the retention of characters in morphologically convergent species. Ardea 65:43–52Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Harrison CJO, Walker CA (1976) A review of the bony-toothed birds (Odontopterygiformes): with description of some new species. Tert Res Spec Pap 2:1–62Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hofer H (1950) Zur Morphologie der Kiefermuskulatur der Vögel. Zool Jahrb Anat 70:427–556Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hofer H (1952) Der Gestaltwandel des Schädels der Säugetiere und Vögel, mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der Knickungstypen und der Schädelbasis. Verh Anat Ges 50:102–113Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hopson JA (1964) Pseudodontornis and other large marine birds from the Miocene of South Carolina. Postilla 83:1–19Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Howard H (1929) The avifauna of Emeryville shellmound. Univ Calif Publ Zool 32:301–394Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Howard H (1957) A gigantic "toothed" marine bird from the Miocene of California. Bull Dep Geol S Barbara Mus Natl Hist 1:1–23Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Lang CT (1952) Über die Ontogenie der Knickungsverhaltnisse beim Vögel-schadel. Verh Anat Ges 50:127–136Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Livezey BC (1986) A phylogenetic analysis of recent Anseriform genera using morphological characters. Auk 103:737–754Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Livezey BC (1997) A phylogenetic analysis of basal Anseriformes, the fossil Presbyornis, and the interordinal relationships of waterfowl. Zool J Linn Soc 121:361–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Livezey BC, Martin LD (1988) The systematic position of the Miocene anatid Anas blanchardi Milne-Edwards. J Vertebr Paleontol 8:196–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Livezey BC, Zusi RL (2001) Higher-order phylogenetics of modern Aves based on comparative anatomy. Neth J Zool 51:179–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Lowe PR (1926) More notes on the quadrate as a factor in avian classification. Ibis 2:152–189Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Mayr G (2003) The phylogenetic affinities of the shoebill (Balaeniceps rex). J Ornithol 144:157–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Mayr G, Clarke J (2003) The deep divergences of neornithine birds: a phylogenetic analysis of morphological characters. Cladistics 19:527–553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Milne-Edwards A (1867–1868) Recherches anatomiques et paléontologiques pour servir à l'histoire des oiseaux fossiles de la France. Victor Masson et fils, ParisGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Olson SL (1975) Paleornithology of St. Helena Island, South Atlantic Ocean. Smithson Contrib Paleobiol 23:1–49Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Olson SL (1984) A brief synopsis of the fossil birds from the Pamunkey River and other Tertiary marine deposits in Virginia. In: Ward LW, Krafft K (eds) Stratigraphy and paleontology of the outcropping Tertiary beds in the Pamunkey River region, central Virginia Coastal Plain—guidebook for Atlantic Coastal Plain Geological Association 1984 field trip. Atlantic Coastal Plain Geological Association, pp 217–223Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Olson SL (1985) Early Pliocene Procellariiformes (Aves) from Langebaanweg, south-western Cape Province, South Africa. Ann S Afr Mus 95:123–145Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Olson SL (1985) The fossil record of birds. In: Farner DS, King JR, Parkes KC (eds) Avian biology, vol 8. Academic Press, New York, pp 79–256Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Olson SL, Rasmussen PC (2001) Miocene and Pliocene birds from the Lee Creek Mine, North Carolina. Smithson Contrib Paleobiol 90:233–365Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Owen R (1873) Description of the skull of a dentigerous bird (Odontopteryx toliapicus, Ow.) from the London Clay of Sheppey. Q J Geol Soc Lond 29:511–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Owre OT (1967) Adaptations for locomotion and feeding in the Anhinga and Double-crested Cormorant. Ornithol Monogr 6:1–138Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Pycraft WP (1898) Contributions to the osteology of birds. Part I. Steganopodes. Proc Zool Soc Lond 1898:82–101Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Shufeldt RW (1888) Observations upon the osteology of the orders Tubinares and Steganopodes. Proc US Natl Mus 11:253–315Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Shufeldt RW (1902) The osteology of the Steganopodes. Mem Carnegie Mus 1:109–223Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Shufeldt RW (1904) On the osteology and systematic position of the Pygopodes. Am Nat 38:13–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Shufeldt RW (1916) New extinct bird from South Carolina. Geol Mag 6:343–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Sorenson MD, Oneal E, García-Moreno J, Mindell DP (2003) More taxa, more characters: the hoatzin problem is still unresolved. Mol Biol Evol 20:1484–1499CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Spulski B (1910) Odontopteryx longirostris n. sp. Z Dtsch Geol Ges 62:507–524Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Starck D (1955) Die endokraniale Morphologie der Ratiten, besonders der Apterygidae und Dinornithidae. Morph Jahrb 96:14–72Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Starck D, Barnikol A (1954) Beiträge zur Morphologie der Trigeminus-muskulatur der Vögel (besonders der Accipitres, Cathartidae, Striges und Anseres). Morph Jahrb 94:1–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Stidham TA (2004) New skull material of Osteodontornis orri (Aves: Pelagornithidae) from the Miocene of California. Paleobios 24:7–12Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Swofford DL (1998) PAUP* 4.0. Sinauer, Sunderland, MAGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Van Tuinen M, Sibley CG, Hedges SB (2000) The early history of modern birds inferred from DNA sequences of nuclear and mitochondrial ribosomal genes. Mol Biol Evol 17:451–457PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Walsh SA, Hume JP (2001) A new Neogene marine avian assemblage from north-central Chile. J Vertebr Paleontol 21:484–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Warheit KI (2002) The seabird fossil record and the role of paleontology in understanding seabird community structure. In: Schreiber EA, Burger J (eds) Biology of marine birds. CRC, Boca Raton, FL, pp 17–55Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Weber E (1996) Das Skelet-Muskel-System des Kieferapparates von Aepypodius arfakianus (Salvadori, 1877) (Aves, Megapodiidae). Cour ForschInst Senckenb 189:1–132Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Werner CF (1963) Schädel-, Gehirn- und Labyrinthtypen bei den Vögeln. Morph Jahrb 104:54–87Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Zusi RL (1975) An interpretation of skull structure in penguins. In: Stonehouse B (ed) The biology of penguins. Macmillan, London, pp 59–84Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Zusi RL, Livezey BC (2000) Homology and phylogenetic implications of some enigmatic cranial features in galliform and anseriform birds. Ann Carnegie Mus 69:157–193Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Zusi RL, Storer RW (1969) Osteology and myology of the head and neck of the pied-billed grebes (Podilymbus). Misc Publ Mus Zool Univ Mich 139:1–49Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Zusi RL, Warheit KI (1992) On the evolution of intraramal mandibular joints in pseudodontorns (Aves: Odontopterygia). In: Campbell KE (ed) Papers in avian paleontology honoring Pierce Brodkorb. Science series 36. Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, Los Angeles, pp 351–360Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Département Histoire de la Terre (MNHN/CNRS UMR 5143)Muséum National d’Histoire NaturelleParisFrance

Personalised recommendations