Mastrus ridibundus parasitoids eavesdrop on cocoon-spinning codling moth, Cydia pomonella, larvae
- 235 Downloads
Cocoon-spinning larvae of the codling moth, Cydia pomonella L. (Lepidoptera: Olethreutidae) employ a pheromone that attracts or arrests conspecifics seeking pupation sites. Such intraspecific communication signals are important cues for illicit receivers such as parasitoids to exploit. We tested the hypothesis that the prepupal C. pomonella parasitoid Mastrus ridibundus Gravenhorst (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) exploits the larval aggregation pheromone to locate host prepupae. In laboratory olfactometer experiments, female M. ridibundus were attracted to 3-day-old cocoons containing C. pomonella larvae or prepupae. Older cocoons containing C. pomonella pupae, or larvae and prepupae excised from cocoons, were not attractive. In gas chromatographic-electroantennographic detection (GC-EAD) analyses of bioactive Porapak Q extract of cocoon-derived airborne semiochemicals, ten compounds elicited responses from female M. ridibundus antennae. Comparative GC-mass spectrometry of authentic standards and cocoon-volatiles determined that these compounds were 3-carene, myrcene, heptanal, octanal, nonanal, decanal, (E)-2-octenal, (E)-2-nonenal, sulcatone, and geranylacetone. A synthetic 11-component blend consisting of these ten EAD-active compounds plus EAD-inactive (+)-limonene (the most abundant cocoon-derived volatile) was as effective as Porapak Q cocoon extract in attracting both female M. ridibundus and C. pomonella larvae seeking pupation sites. Only three components could be deleted from the 11-component blend without diminishing its attractiveness to M. ridibundus, which underlines the complexity of information received and processed during foraging for hosts. Mastrus ridibundus obviously “eavesdrop” on the pheromonal communication signals of C. pomonella larvae that reliably indicate host presence.
KeywordsTest Stimulus Limonene Aggregation Pheromone Pheromonal Communication Codling Moth
Z.J. thanks Thelma Finlayson for a Finlayson Fellowship, and T.U. thanks the Washington Tree Fruit Research Commission for grants supporting parasitoid introduction. We also thank C. Lowenberger, M. Mackauer, P. Landolt, B. Roitberg, and G.J.R. Judd for review of the manuscript. The research was further supported by a grant from NSERC to G.G. Insects were maintained in SFU’s Global Forest Quarantine Facility (GF-18–2000-SFU-6).
- Bekkaoui A, Thibout E (1993) Role of the cocoon of Acrolepiopsis assectella (Lep., Hyponomeutidae) in host recognition by the parasitoid Diadromus pulchellus (Hym., Ichneumonidae). Entomophaga 38:101–113Google Scholar
- Haynes KF, Yeargan KV (1999) Exploitation of intraspecific communication systems: illicit signalers and receivers. Ann Entomol Soc Am 92:960–970Google Scholar
- Hoffmeister TS, Roitberg BD (1997) To mark the host or the patch: decisions of a parasitoid searching for concealed host larvae. Evol Ecol 11:145–168Google Scholar
- Hoffmeister TS, Roitberg BD, Lalonde RG (2000) Catching Ariadne by her thread: how a parasitoid exploits the herbivore’s marking trails to locate its host. Entomol Exp Appl 95:77–85Google Scholar
- Kennedy JS (1974) Changes in the patterning of behavioural sequences. In: Brown LB (ed) Experimental analysis of behaviour. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 1–6Google Scholar
- Kuhlmann U, Mills NJ (1999) Exploring the biodiversity of Central Asia to assess specialized parasitoids for biological control of apple pests in Europe and North America. Integrated plant protection in orchards. IOBC WPRS Bull 22:1–6Google Scholar
- Unruh TR (1997) From Russia with love: new predators and parasites for control of tree fruit insect pests. Proceedings of the 93rd Annual Meeting of the Washington State Horticultural Association, pp 42–49Google Scholar
- Wertheim B, Vet LEM, Dicke M (2003) Increased risk of parasitism as ecological costs of using aggregation pheromones: laboratory and field study of Drosophila-Leptopilina interaction. Oikos 100:269–282Google Scholar
- Weseloh RM (1981) Host location by parasitoids. In: Nordlund DA, Jones RL, Lewis WJ (eds) Semiochemicals: their role in pest control. Academic, London, pp 79–95Google Scholar
- Wiskerke JSC, Dicke M, Vet LEM (1993) Larval parasitoid uses aggregation pheromone of adult hosts in foraging behavior: a solution to the reliability-detectability problem. Oecologia 93:145–148Google Scholar
- Zar JH (1999) Biostatistical analysis. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, N.J.Google Scholar