Naturwissenschaften

, Volume 91, Issue 10, pp 493–497

Bonitasaura salgadoi gen. et sp. nov.: a beaked sauropod from the Late Cretaceous of Patagonia

Short Communication

Abstract

Ornithischian and theropod dinosaurs were morphologically diverse during the Cretaceous. In contrast, sauropods were relatively more conservative. The anatomy of Bonitasaura salgadoi, a new 9-m titanosaurian sauropod from Upper Cretaceous beds of Patagonia, suggests that sauropod anatomical diversity would have included unexpected items. Its unusual, rectangular lower jaw possesses narrow, anteriorly restricted teeth and shows evidence of a sharp keratinous sheath over the non-dentigerous region that probably worked to guillotine plant material. This discovery definitely demonstrates that titanosaurs acquired a mandibular configuration similar to that of some basal diplodocoids, as had already been suggested by the lower jaw of the controversial genus Antarctosaurus. This oral configuration, plus the beak-like structure and the skull shape, resemble some traits more commonly seen in Laurasian ornithischians, mostly unexpressed in southern continents. A high sauropod morphological diversity seems to be in agreement with the poorly represented ornithischian clades of the southern hemisphere.

References

  1. Apesteguía S, Gallina PA (2002) A new non-saltasaurine titanosaur from ‘Rancho de Ávila’ (Río Negro) in the Bajo de la Carpa-Anacleto formations boundary. Ameghiniana 40:51RGoogle Scholar
  2. Bakker RT (1986) The dinosaur heresies: new theories unlocking the mystery of the dinosaurs and their extinction. Zebra BooksGoogle Scholar
  3. Calvo JO (1994) Jaw mechanics in sauropod dinosaurs. Gaia 10:183–193Google Scholar
  4. Calvo JO, González Riga, BJ (2003) Rinconsaurus caudamirus gen. et sp. nov., a new titanosaurid (Dinosauria, Sauropoda) from the Late Cretaceous of Patagonia, Argentina. Rev Geol Chile 30:333–353Google Scholar
  5. Coria RA, Chiappe LM (2001) Tooth replacement in a sauropod maxilla from the Upper Cretaceous of Patagonia, Argentina. Ameghiniana 38:463–466Google Scholar
  6. Curry Rogers K, Forster CA (2004) The skull of Rapetosaurus krausei (Sauropoda: Titanosauria) from the Late Cretaceous of Madagascar. J Vert Paleontol 24: 121–144Google Scholar
  7. Gallina PA, Apesteguía S, Novas FE (2002) ¿Un elefante bajo la alfombra? Los Rebbachisauridae (Sauropoda, Diplodocimorpha) del Cretácico de Gondwana. Nuevas evidencias en “La Buitrera” (Fm. Candeleros), provincia de Río Negro. Ameghiniana 39:10RGoogle Scholar
  8. Holland WJ (1906) The osteology of Diplodocus Marsh. Mem Carn Mus 2:225–264Google Scholar
  9. Huene F von (1929) Los saurisquios y ornitisquios del Cretáceo Argentino. Ann Mus La Plata Sect Paleontol 2:1–196Google Scholar
  10. Hugo C, Leanza HA (1999) Hoja Geológica 3969-IV, General Roca, provincias del Neuquén y Río Negro. Inst Geol Rec Nat SEGEMAR 3969-IV, pp 1–95Google Scholar
  11. Jacobs L, Winkler DA, Downs WR, Gomani EM (1993) New material of an Early Cretaceous titanosaurid sauropod dinosaur from Malawi. Palaeontology 36:523–534Google Scholar
  12. Martínez R (1998) An articulated skull and neck of Sauropoda (Dinosauria: Saurischia) from the Upper Cretaceous of Central Patagonia, Argentina. J Vert Paleontol 18:61AGoogle Scholar
  13. Morris WJ (1970) Hadrosaurian dinosaur bills: morphology and function. Contrib Sci 193:1–14Google Scholar
  14. Norell MA, Makovicky PJ, Currie PJ (2001) The beaks of ostrich dinosaurs. Nature 412:873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Nowinski A (1971) Nemegtosaurus mongoliensis n. gen., n. sp. (Sauropoda) from the Uppermost Cretaceous of Mongolia. Palaeontol Polon 25:57–81Google Scholar
  16. Paul GS (1984) The segnosaurian dinosaurs: relics of the prosauropod–ornithischian transition? J Vert Paleontol 4:507–515Google Scholar
  17. Powell JE (1979) Sobre una asociación de dinosaurios y otras evidencias de vertebrados de la región de La Candelaria, prov. de Salta, Argentina. Ameghiniana 16:191–204Google Scholar
  18. Powell JE (2003) Revision of the South American titanosaurid dinosaurs: palaeobiological, palaeobiogeographical and phylogenetic aspects. Rec Queen Victoria Mus 111:1–173Google Scholar
  19. Salgado L (2001) Los Saurópodos de Patagonia: sistemática, evolución y paleobiología. Abst II J Int Paleontol Dinos Ent Burgos 2001:139–168Google Scholar
  20. Salgado L, Calvo JO (1997) Evolution of titanosaurid sauropods. II. The cranial evidence. Ameghiniana 34:33–47Google Scholar
  21. Sereno PC, Beck AL, Dutheil DB, Larsson HCE, Lyon GH, Moussa B, Sadleir RW, Sidor CA, Varricchio DJ, Wilson GP, Wilson JA (1999) Cretaceous sauropods from the Sahara and the uneven rate of skeletal evolution among dinosaurs. Science 286:1342–1347CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Upchurch P (1999) The phylogenetic relationships of the Nemegtosauridae (Saurischia, Saruopoda). J Vert Paleontol 19:106–125Google Scholar
  23. Wilson JA (2002) Sauropod dinosaur phylogeny: critique and cladistic analysis. Zool J Linn Soc 136:217–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wilson JA, Carrano MT (1999) Titanosaurs and the origin of ‘wide-gauge’ trackways: a biomechanical and systematic perspective on sauropod locomotion. Paleobiology 25:252–267Google Scholar
  25. Wilson JA, Sereno PC (1998) Early evolution and higher-level phylogeny of sauropod dinosaurs. J Vert Paleontol Mem 5:1–68Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales “Bernardino Rivadavia”Buenos AiresArgentina

Personalised recommendations