Naturwissenschaften

, Volume 91, Issue 8, pp 391–395

Communal nesting and kinship in degus (Octodon degus)

  • Luis A. Ebensperger
  • María José Hurtado
  • Mauricio Soto-Gamboa
  • Eileen A. Lacey
  • Ann T. Chang
Short Communication

Abstract

Communal nesting is a fundamental component of many animal societies. Because the fitness consequences of this behavior vary with the relatedness among nest mates, understanding the kin structure of communally nesting groups is critical to understanding why such groups form. Observations of captive degus (Octodon degus) indicate that multiple females nest together, even when supplied with several nest boxes. To determine whether free-living degus also engage in communal nesting, we used radiotelemetry to monitor spatial relationships among adult females in a population of O. degus in central Chile. These analyses revealed that females formed stable associations of > 2–4 individuals, all of whom shared the same nest site at night. During the daytime, spatial overlap and frequency of social interactions were greatest among co-nesting females, suggesting that nesting associations represent distinct social units. To assess kinship among co-nesting females, we examined genotypic variation in our study animals at six microsatellite loci. These analyses indicated that mean pairwise relatedness among members of a nesting association (r=0.25) was significantly greater than that among randomly selected females (r=−0.03). Thus, communally nesting groups of degus are composed of female kin, making it possible for indirect as well as direct fitness benefits to contribute to sociality in this species.

References

  1. Ebensperger LA, Bozinovic F (2000) Communal burrowing in the hystricognath rodent, Octodon degus: a benefit of sociality? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 47:365–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ebensperger LA, Wallem PK (2002) Grouping increases the ability of the social rodent, Octodon degus, to detect predators when using exposed microhabitats. Oikos 98:491–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ebensperger LA, Veloso C, Wallem PK (2002) Do female degus communally nest and nurse their pups? J Ethol 20:143–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fulk GW (1976) Notes on the activity, reproduction, and social behavior of Octodon degus. J Mammal 57:495–505Google Scholar
  5. Hamilton WD (1964) The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I, II. J Theor Biol 7:1–52PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Hayes LD (2000) To nest communally or not to nest communally: a review of rodent communal nesting and nursing. Anim Behav 59:677–688CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Hood G (2004) POPTOOLS 2.6.2. http://www.cse.csiro.au/poptools/
  8. Hoogland JL (1995) The black-tailed prairie dog: social life of a burrowing mammal. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Ill., USAGoogle Scholar
  9. Hughes C (1998) Integrating molecular techniques with field methods in studies of social behavior: a revolution results. Ecology 79:383–399Google Scholar
  10. Jesseau SA, Holmes W (2002) Mother-offspring recognition in the degu, Octodon degus. Sextas Jornadas de Etología, Santiago, Chile, p 19Google Scholar
  11. Kenagy GJ, Nespolo RF, Vásquez RA, Bozinovic F (2002) Daily and seasonal limits of time and temperature to activity of degus. Rev Chil Hist Nat 75:567–581Google Scholar
  12. Kenward RE, Hodder KH (1996) RANGES V: an analysis system for biological location data. Institute for Terrestrial Ecology, Dorset, UKGoogle Scholar
  13. Lacey EA, Braude SH, Wieczorek JR (1997) Burrow sharing by colonial tuco-tucos (Ctenomys sociabilis). J Mammal 78:556–562Google Scholar
  14. Lewis SE, Pusey AE (1997) Factors influencing the occurrence of communal care in plural breeding mammals. In: Solomon NG, French JA (eds) Cooperative breeding in mammals. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 335–363Google Scholar
  15. Márquez N, Villavicencio C, Cecchi C, Vásquez RA (2002) Reconocimiento de parentesco en el roedor caviomorfo Octodon degus: relaciones hermano-hermano y padre-hijo. Sextas Jornadas de Etología, Santiago, Chile, p 20Google Scholar
  16. Marshall TC, Slate J, Kruuk EB, Pemberton JM (1998) Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Mol Ecol 7:639–655CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Queller DC, Goodnight KF (1989) Estimating relatedness using genetic markers. Evolution 43:258–275Google Scholar
  18. Raymond M, Rousset F (1995) An exact test for population differentiation. Evolution 49:1280–1283Google Scholar
  19. Reeve HK, Westneat DF, Noon WA, Sherman PW, Aquadro CF (1990) DNA fingerprinting reveals high levels of inbreeding in colonies of the eusocial naked mole-rat. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 87:2496–2500PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Schroeder JW, Honeycutt RL, Rooney AP, Hann J, Begall S, Gallardo MH (2000) Microsatellites from the South American coruro, Spalacopus cyanus. Mol Ecol 9:1433–1449CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. West SA, Penn I, Griffin AS (2002) Cooperation and competition among relatives. Science 296:72–75CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Woods CA, Boraker DK (1975) Octodon degus. Am Soc Mammal, Mammal Spec 67:1–5Google Scholar
  23. Yáñez JL (1976) Ecoetología de Octodon degus. BS thesis, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, ChileGoogle Scholar
  24. Zunino S, Saiz F, Yates LR (1992) Uso del espacio, densidad de Octodon degus y oferta de recursos en Ocoa, Parque Nacional La Campana, Chile. Rev Chil Hist Nat 65:343–355Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Luis A. Ebensperger
    • 1
  • María José Hurtado
    • 1
  • Mauricio Soto-Gamboa
    • 1
  • Eileen A. Lacey
    • 2
  • Ann T. Chang
    • 2
  1. 1.Centro de Estudios Avanzados en Ecología y Biodiversidad, Departamento de Ecología, Facultad de Ciencias BiológicasPontificia Universidad Católica de ChileSantiagoChile
  2. 2.Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, Department of Integrative BiologyUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations