, Volume 91, Issue 8, pp 386–390 | Cite as

Circadian consequences of social organization in the ant species Camponotus compressus

  • Vijay Kumar SharmaEmail author
  • Shahnaz Rahman Lone
  • Anubhuthi Goel
  • M. K. Chandrashekaran
Short Communication


The locomotor activity rhythm of different castes of the ant species Camponotus compressus was monitored individually under laboratory light/dark (LD) cycles, and under continuous darkness (DD). The colony of this ant species comprises two sexual castes, the queens and the males, and three worker castes, namely the major, media, and minor workers. The virgin males and virgin queens display rhythmic activity patterns, but the mated queens were arrhythmic while laying eggs, with the rhythmicity resuming soon after egg-laying. Under the LD regime, major workers showed nocturnal patterns, while about 75% of the media workers displayed nocturnal patterns and about 25% showed diurnal patterns. Under the DD regime, most major workers exhibited circadian rhythm of activity with a single steady state, whereas media workers displayed two types of activity patterns, with activity patterns changing after 6–9 days in DD (turn-arounds). The pre-turn-around τ of the ants that showed nocturnal activity patterns during LD entrainment was <24 h after release into DD, which then became >24 h, after 6–9 days. On the other hand, the pre-turn-around τ of those ants that exhibited diurnal patterns during LD entrainment was first >24 h after release into DD, and then became <24 h, after 6–9 days. The activity of the minor workers neither entrained to LD cycles nor showed any sign of free-run in DD. It appears that the circadian clocks of the ant species C. compressus are flexible, and may perhaps depend upon the tasks assigned to them in the colony.


Locomotor Activity Circadian Rhythm Circadian Clock Minor Worker Media Worker 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



We acknowledge the Department of Science and Technology, Government of India for financially supporting this project. We thank Prof. Raghavendra Gadagkar, Bangalore, for his help and encouragement during the entire project. We thank three anonymous reviewers for carefully reading the manuscript and suggesting improvements.


  1. Bloch G, Toma DP, Robinson GE (2001) Behavioural rhythmicity, age, division of labor, and period expression in the honeybee brain. J Biol Rhythms 16:444–456CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bourke AFG, Franks NR (1995) Social evolution in ants. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J., pp 400–443Google Scholar
  3. Calabi P (1988) Behavioural flexibility in Hymenoptera: a re-examination of the concept of caste. In: Trager JC (ed) Advances in myrmecology. EJ Brill, Leiden, The Netherlands, pp 237–258Google Scholar
  4. Dunlap JC, Loros JJ, DeCoursey PJ (2003) Chronobiology. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Mass.Google Scholar
  5. Gordon DM (1989) Dynamics of task switching in harvester ants. Anim Behav 38:194–204Google Scholar
  6. Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (1990) The ants. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. McCluskey ES (1992) Periodicity and diversity in ant mating flights. Comp Biochem Physiol 103A:241–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. North RD (1987) Circadian rhythm of locomotor activity in individual workers of the wood ant Formica rufa. Physiol Entomol 12:445–454Google Scholar
  9. North RD (1993) Entrainment of the circadian rhythms of locomotor activity in wood ants by temperature. Anim Behav 45:393–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Roces F, Nuñez JA (1996) A circadian rhythm of thermal preference in the ant Camponotus mus: masking and entrainment by temperature cycles. Physiol. Entomol. 21:138-142Google Scholar
  11. Saunders DS (2002) Insect clocks. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 10–13Google Scholar
  12. Sendova-Franks AB, Franks NR (1993) Task allocation in ant colonies within variable environments: a study of temporal polyethism: experimental. Bull Math Biol 55:75–96Google Scholar
  13. Sendova-Franks AB, Franks NR (1994) Social resilience in individual worker ants and its role in division of labour. Proc R Soc Lond B 256:305–309Google Scholar
  14. Sharma VK (2003a) Period responses to Zeitgeber signals stabilize circadian clocks during entrainment. Chronobiol Int 20:389–404CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Sharma VK (2003b) A simple computer-aided device for monitoring activity of small mammals and insects. Biol Rhythm Res 34:3–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Sharma VK, Lone SR, Goel A, Chandrashekaran MK (2004a) Lability in the circadian activity rhythms of the medium workers of the ant Camponotus compressus. Chronobiol Int 21:297–308Google Scholar
  17. Sharma VK, Lone SR, Goel A (2004b) Clocks for sex: loss of circadian rhythms in ants after mating? Naturwissenschaften DOI:  10.1007/s00114-004-0526-8Google Scholar
  18. Toma DP, Bloch G, Moore D, Robinson GE (2000) Changes in period mRNA levels in the brain and division of labor in honeybee colonies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:6914–6919CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vijay Kumar Sharma
    • 1
    Email author
  • Shahnaz Rahman Lone
    • 1
  • Anubhuthi Goel
    • 1
  • M. K. Chandrashekaran
    • 1
  1. 1.Chronobiology Laboratory, Evolutionary and Organismal Biology UnitJawaharlal Nehru Centre for Advanced Scientific Research560 064, BangaloreIndia

Personalised recommendations