Advertisement

Naturwissenschaften

, Volume 91, Issue 4, pp 182–185 | Cite as

Dinoponera lucida Emery (Formicidae: Ponerinae): the highest number of chromosomes known in Hymenoptera

  • C. S. F. Mariano
  • J. H. C. Delabie
  • L. S. Ramos
  • S. Lacau
  • S. G. Pompolo
Short Communication

Abstract

We report the remarkable karyotype of Dinoponera lucida, a Brazilian endemic ponerine ant. Its chromosome number is 2n=106, most of the chromosomes are acrocentric and of very small size, and the karyotype formula is 88A+18M. A chromosome pair of the AMt type is reported. This is the largest number of chromosomes reported for the Hymenoptera order until now.

Keywords

Chromosome Number Acrocentric Chromosome Diploid Chromosome Number Karyotype Formula High Chromosome Number 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge CNPq for the grant concession to three of them, Anderson Fernandes and Lucileide S. Ramos for technical support, and Nathalie Hites and Jonathan D. Majer for kindly reviewing the English manuscript. The authors declare that the present experiment complies with the current laws of Brazil.

References

  1. Araújo CZD, Lachaud J-P, Fresneau D (1990) Le système reproductif chez une ponérine sans reine: Dinoponera quadriceps Santschi. Behav Proc 22:101–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baldanza F, Gaudio L, Viggiani G (1999) Cytotaxonomic studies of Encarsia Förster (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae). Bull Entomol Res 89:209–215Google Scholar
  3. Bolton B, Brown Jr WL (2002) Loboponera gen. n. and a review of the Afrotropical Plectroctena genus group (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Bull Nat Hist Mus Lond Entomol 71:1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Crosland MWJ, Crozier RH (1986) Myrmecia pilosula, an ant with only one pair of chromosomes. Science 231:1278Google Scholar
  5. Fourcassié V, Oliveira PS (2002) Foraging ecology of the giant Amazonian ant Dinoponera gigantea (Hymenoptera, Formicidae, Ponerinae): activity schedule, diet and spatial foraging patterns. J Nat Hist 36:2211–2227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fowler HG (1985) Populations, foraging and territoriality in Dinoponera australis (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Rev Bras Entomol 29:443–447Google Scholar
  7. Goñi B, Imai HT, Kubota M, Kondo M, Yong H, Tho YP (1981) Chromosome observations on tropical ants in western Malaysia and Singapore. Annu Rep Natl Inst Genet Jpn 32:71–73Google Scholar
  8. Hauschteck-Jungen E, Jungen H (1983) Ant chromosomes. II Karyotypes of western paleartic species. Insectes Soc 30:149–164Google Scholar
  9. Hoshiba H, Imai HT (1993) Chromosome evolution of bees and wasps (Hymenoptera, Apocrita) on the basis of C-banding pattern analyses. Jpn J Entomol 61:465–492Google Scholar
  10. Hoshiba H, Matsura M, Imai HT (1989) Karyotype evolution in the social wasps (Hymenoptera, Vespidae). Jpn J Genet 64:209–222Google Scholar
  11. Imai HT (1969) Karyological studies of Japanese ants. I. Chromosome evolution and species differentiation in ants. Sci Rep Tokyo Kyoiku Daigaku Sect B 14:27–46Google Scholar
  12. Imai HT (1991) Mutability of constitutive heterochromatin (C-bands) during eukaryotic chromosomal evolution and their cytological meaning. Jpn J Genet 66:635–661PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Imai HT, Kubota M (1972) Karyological studies of Japanese ants (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). III. Karyotypes of nine species in Ponerinae, Formicinae, and Myrmicinae. Chromosoma 37:193–200PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Imai HT, Crozier RH, Taylor RW (1977) Karyotype evolution in Australian ants. Chromosoma 59:341–393Google Scholar
  15. Imai HT, Baroni-Urbani C, Kubota M, Sharma GP, Narasimhanna MN, Das BC, Sharma AK, Sharma A, Deodikar GB, Vaidya VG, Rajasekarasetty MR (1984a) Karyological survey of Indian ants. Jpn J Genet 59:1–32Google Scholar
  16. Imai HT, Brown WL Jr, Kubota M, Yong H-S, Tho YP (1984b) Chromosome observations on tropical ants from western Malaysia. II. Annu Rep Natl Inst Genet Jpn 34:66–69Google Scholar
  17. Imai HT, Kubota M, Brown WL Jr, Ihara M, Tohari M, Pranata RI (1985) Chromosome observations on tropical ants from Indonesia. Annu Rep Natl Inst Genet Jpn 35:46–48Google Scholar
  18. Imai HT, Taylor RW, Crosland MWJ, Crozier RH (1988) Modes of spontaneous chromosomal mutation and karyotype evolution in ants with reference to the minimum interaction hypothesis. Jpn J Genet 63:159–185PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Imai HT, Taylor RW, Kubota M, Ogata K, Wada MY (1990) Notes on the remarkable karyology of the primitive ant Nothomyrmecia macrops, and the related genus Myrmecia (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Psyche 97:133–140Google Scholar
  20. Imai HT, Crozier RH, Taylor RW (1994) Experimental bases for the minimum interaction theory. I. Chromosome evolution in ants of the Myrmecia pilosula species complex (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Myrmeciinae). Jpn J Genet 69:137–182Google Scholar
  21. Imai HT, Satta Y, Wada M, Takahata N (2002) Estimation of the highest chromosome number of eukaryote based on the minimum interaction theory. J Theor Biol 217:61–74CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Kempf WW (1972) Catálogo abreviado das formigas da Região Neotropical (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Stud Entomol 15:3–344Google Scholar
  23. Mariano CSF, Pompolo SG, Delabie JHC (1999) Citogenética das espécies gêmeas e simpátricas Pachycondyla villosa e Pachycondyla sp. ‘inversa’ (Ponerinae). Naturalia 24:215–217Google Scholar
  24. Mariano CSF, Delabie JHC, Nakayama K, Fresneau D, Pompolo, SG (2001) O complexo Pachycondyla apicalis Latreille – Pachycondyla obscuricornis Emery (Formicidae: Ponerinae): Um “grupo-espécies”? Anais XV Encontro Mirmecologia, Londrina, PR, Brazil, pp 375–378Google Scholar
  25. Mason WRM, Huber JT (1993) Order Hymenoptera. In: Goulet H, Huber JT (eds) Hymenoptera of the world: an identification guide to families. Minister of Supply and Services, Canada, pp 4–12Google Scholar
  26. Ministério do Meio Ambiente (2003) Lista nacional das espécies da fauna brasileira ameaçadas de extinção, Brazil (http://wwwmmagovbr/port/sbf/fauna/indexcfm)
  27. Monnin T, Peeters C (1998) Monogyny and regulation of worker mating in the queenless ant Dinoponera quadriceps. Anim Behav 55:299–306Google Scholar
  28. Monnin T, Ratnieks FLW, Jones G, Beard R (2002) Pretender punishment induced by chemical signalling in a queenless ant. Nature 419:61–65CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Oldham NJ, Keegans SJ, Morgan ED, Paiva RVS, Brandão CRF, Schoeters E, Billen JPJ (1994) Mandibular gland contents of a colony of the queenless ponerine ant Dinoponera australis. Naturwissenschaften 81:313–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Paiva RVS, Brandão CRF (1995) Nests, worker population, and reproductive status of workers, in the giant queenless ponerine ant Dinoponera Roger (Hymenoptera Formicidae). Ethol Ecol Evol 7:297–312Google Scholar
  31. Peeters C (1993) Monogyny and polygyny in ponerine ants with or without queens. In: Keller L (ed) Queen number and sociality in insects. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 235–261Google Scholar
  32. Peeters C (1997) Morphologically ‘primitive’ ants: comparative review of social characters, and the importance of queen–worker dimorphism. In: Choe J, Crespi B (eds) The evolution of social behaviour in insects and arachnids. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 372–391Google Scholar
  33. Peeters C, Monnin T, Malosse C (1999) Cuticular hydrocarbons correlated with reproductive status in a queenless ant. Proc R Soc Lond B 266:1323–1327Google Scholar
  34. Rust J, Andersen NM (1999) Giant ants from the Paleogene of Denmark with a discussion of the fossil history and early evolution of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Zool J Linn Soc 125:331–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Schultz TR (2000) In search of ant ancestors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:14028–14029CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Silva JC Jr (2001) Citogenética e razão sexual em vespas parasitoides (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea). PhD thesis, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, MG, BrazilGoogle Scholar
  37. Tjan KN, Imai HT, Kubota M, Brown WL Jr, Gotwald WH Jr, Yong H-S, Leh C (1985) Chromosome observations of Sarawak ants. Annu Rep Natl Inst Genet Jpn 36:57Google Scholar
  38. Ward PS, Brady SG (2003) Phylogeny and biogeography of the ant subfamily Myrmeciinae (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Invertebr Syst 17:361–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. S. F. Mariano
    • 1
    • 2
  • J. H. C. Delabie
    • 2
  • L. S. Ramos
    • 2
    • 3
  • S. Lacau
    • 2
    • 4
  • S. G. Pompolo
    • 5
  1. 1.P-G EntomologiaUniversidade Federal de ViçosaViçosaBrazil
  2. 2.UPA Laboratório de MirmecologiaConvênio UESC-CEPECItabunaBrazil
  3. 3.CEIS Instituto de BiociênciasUNESPRio ClaroBrazil
  4. 4.Laboratoire d’EntomologieMNHNParisFrance
  5. 5.Universidade Federal de ViçosaViçosaBrazil

Personalised recommendations