Advertisement

Naturwissenschaften

, Volume 90, Issue 12, pp 577–582 | Cite as

The reproductive choices of eavesdropping female black-capped chickadees, Poecile atricapillus

  • Daniel J. Mennill
  • Peter T. Boag
  • Laurene M. Ratcliffe
Short Communication

Abstract

In animals where males engage in signalling interactions, females might evaluate male–male contests to inform their reproductive choices. We used interactive playback to engage territorial male black-capped chickadees (Poecile atricapillus) of known dominance status in countersinging contests with an aggressive or submissive opponent. Previous analysis of these data showed that high-ranking males who received aggressive playback were more likely to be cuckolded. Here we describe the particular reproductive decisions of females whose partners received aggressive versus submissive playback. The proportion of extra-pair young per brood was higher for females paired to high-ranking males that received aggressive playback compared to submissive playback, and similar to levels in broods of females paired to low-ranking males. We found no strong predictors of whether high-ranking subjects lost paternity following aggressive playback. Females usually preferred extra-pair sires with high dominance status. When females had extra-pair fertilizations with low-ranking males, females chose males who had received submissive playback. We conclude that females mated to aggressive-playback, high-ranking males pursued mixed mating strategies similar to those of females mated to low-ranking males. Our results support the idea that male performance in song contests may influence multiple aspects of female reproductive choices.

Keywords

Male Song Reproductive Choice Song Contest High Rank Score Winter Flock 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank R. DeBruyn, A. MacDougall, D. Aiama, A. Boon, P. Christie, C. Cliffe, L. Colgan, M. Cunningham, S. Doucet, J. Hodson, B. Meigs, S. Ramsay, and N. Vreeswyck for field and lab assistance, S. Doucet for comments on the manuscript, and Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, the American Museum of Natural History, the American Ornithologists’ Union, the Animal Behavior Society, the Association of Field Ornithologists, and the Society of Canadian Ornithologists for funding. This experiment complies with the laws of Canada.

References

  1. Berglund A, Bisazza A, Pilastro A (1996) Armaments and ornaments: an evolutionary explanation of traits of dual utility. Biol J Linn Soc 58:385–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Horn AG, Leonard ML, Ratcliffe LM, Shackleton SA, Weisman RG (1992) Frequency variation in songs of black-capped chickadees (Parus atricapillus). Auk 109:847–852Google Scholar
  3. Kempenaers B (1993) The use of a breeding synchrony index. Ornis Scand 24:84Google Scholar
  4. McGregor PK, Dabelsteen T (1996) Communication networks. In: Kroodsma DE, Miller ED (eds) Ecology and evolution of acoustic communication in birds. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, N.Y., pp 409–425Google Scholar
  5. Mennill DJ, Ratcliffe LM (2003) Overlapping and matching in the song contests of black-capped chickadees. Anim Behav (in press)Google Scholar
  6. Mennill DJ, Ratcliffe LM, Boag PT (2002) Female eavesdropping on male song contests in songbirds. Science 296:873CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Mennill DJ, Ramsay SM, Boag PT, Ratcliffe LM (2003) Patterns of extra-pair mating in relation to male dominance status and female nest placement in black-capped chickadees. Behav Ecol (in press)Google Scholar
  8. Otter K, Ratcliffe L, Michaud D, Boag PT (1998) Do female black-capped chickadees prefer high-ranking males as extra-pair partners? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 43:25–36Google Scholar
  9. Otter KA, McGregor PK, Terry AMR, Burford FRL, Peake TM, Dabelsteen T (1999) Do female great tits (Parus major) assess extra-pair males by eavesdropping? A field study using interactive song playback. Proc R Soc Lond B 266:1305–1310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Searcy WA, Yasukawa K (1996) Song and female choice. In: Kroodsma DE, Miller ED (eds) Ecology and evolution of acoustic communication in birds. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, N.Y., pp 454–473Google Scholar
  11. Senar JC, Pascual J (1997) Keel and tarsus length may provide a good predictor of avian body size. Ardea 85:269–274Google Scholar
  12. Smith SM (1988) Extra-pair copulations in black-capped chickadees: the role of the female. Behaviour 107:15–23Google Scholar
  13. Smith SM (1991) The black-capped chickadee: behavioral ecology and natural history. Comstock, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Vehrencamp SL (2001) Is song-type matching a conventional signal of aggressive intentions? Proc R Soc Lond B 268:1637–1642PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel J. Mennill
    • 1
    • 2
  • Peter T. Boag
    • 1
  • Laurene M. Ratcliffe
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiologyQueen’s UniversityKingstonCanada
  2. 2.Department of Biological SciencesAuburn UniversityAuburnUSA

Personalised recommendations