Naturwissenschaften

, Volume 90, Issue 10, pp 477–480 | Cite as

The effect of queen pheromones on worker honey bee ovary development

  • Shelley E.R. Hoover
  • Christopher I. Keeling
  • Mark L. Winston
  • Keith N. Slessor
Short Communication

Abstract

We report results that address a long-standing controversy in honey bee biology, the identity of the queen-produced compounds that inhibit worker honey bee ovary development. As the honey bee is the only organism for which identities have been proposed for any pheromone that regulates reproduction, the resolution of its identity is of broad significance. We examined the effects of synthetic honey bee queen mandibular pheromone (QMP), four newly identified queen retinue pheromone components, and whole-queen extracts on the ovary development of caged worker bees. The newly identified compounds did not inhibit worker ovary development alone, nor did they improve the efficacy of QMP when applied in combination. QMP was as effective as queen extracts at ovary regulation. Caged workers in the QMP and queen extract treatments had better developed ovaries than did workers remaining in queenright colonies. We conclude that QMP is responsible for the ovary-regulating pheromonal capability of queens from European-derived Apis mellifera subspecies.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful for the contributions of Phero-Tech, Geoffrey Morris, Heather Higo and other members of the Simon Fraser University Swarm team, and comments on the manuscript by Larry Dill and Bernie Crespi. This research was funded by grants from NSERC to M.L.W. and K.N.S., a Killam Fellowship to M.L.W., and NSERC fellowships to S.E.R.H. and G. Morris. This research was conducted in accordance with the current laws of Canada.

References

  1. Butler CG (1957) The control of ovary development in worker honeybees (Apis mellifera). Experientia 13:256–257Google Scholar
  2. Butler CG (1959) The source of the substance produced by a queen honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) which inhibits development of ovaries of the workers of her colony. Proc R Entomol Soc Lond A 34:137–138Google Scholar
  3. Butler CG, Fairey EM (1963) The role of the queen in preventing oogenesis in worker honey bees. J Apic Res 2:14–18Google Scholar
  4. Erp A van (1960) Mode of action of the inhibitory substance of the honeybee queen. Insectes Soc 7:207–211Google Scholar
  5. Groot AP de, Voogd S (1954) On the ovary development in queenless worker bees (Apis mellifera L.). Experientia 10:384–385Google Scholar
  6. Jay SC (1968) Factors influencing ovary development of worker honeybees under natural conditions. Can J Zool 46:345–347Google Scholar
  7. Kaatz HH, Hildebrandt H, Engels W (1992) Primer effect of queen pheromone on juvenile hormone biosynthesis in adult worker bees. J Comp Physiol 162:588–592Google Scholar
  8. Keeling CI, Slessor KN, Higo HA, Winston ML (2003) New components of the honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) queen retinue pheromone. Proc Nat Acad Sci 100:4486–4491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lin H (1999) Regulation of worker honey bee reproduction Apis mellifera L. (Hymenoptera: Apidae). PhD thesis, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  10. Lin H, Winston ML (1998) The role of nutrition and temperature in the ovarian development of the worker honey bee (Apis mellifera). Can Entomol 130:883–891Google Scholar
  11. Lin H, Winston ML, Haunerland NH, Slessor KN (1999) Influence of age and population size on ovarian development and vitellogenin titres of queenless worker honey bee (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Can Entomol 131:695–706Google Scholar
  12. Mohammedi A, Paris A, Crauser D, Le Conte Y (1998) Effect of aliphatic esters on ovary development of queenless bees (Apis mellifera L.). Naturwissenschaften 85:455–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Naumann K, Winston ML, Slessor KN, Prestwich GD, Webster FX (1991) Production and transmission of honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) queen mandibular pheromone. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 29:321–332Google Scholar
  14. Oldroyd BP, Smolenski AJ, Cornuet J-M, Crozier RH (1994) Anarchy in the beehive. Nature 371:749Google Scholar
  15. Pankiw T, Winston ML, Plettner E, Slessor KN, Pettis JS, Taylor OR Jr (1996) Mandibular gland components of European and Africanised honey bee queens (Apis mellifera L.). J Chem Ecol 22:605–615Google Scholar
  16. Pernal SF, Currie RW (2000) Pollen quality of fresh and 1-year-old single pollen diets for worker honey bees (Apis mellifera L.). Apidologie 31:387–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Slessor KN, Kaminski L-A, King GGS, Borden JH, Winston ML (1988) Semiochemical basis of the retinue response to queen honey bees. Nature 332:354–356Google Scholar
  18. Velthuis HHW (1970a) Ovarian development in Apis melllifera worker bees. Entomol Exp Appl 13:377–394Google Scholar
  19. Velthuis HHW (1970b) Queen substance from the abdomen of the honey bee queen. Z Vergl Physiol 70:210–222Google Scholar
  20. Velthuis HHW, Es J van (1964) Some functional aspects of the mandibular glands of the honey bee queen. J Apic Res 3:11–16Google Scholar
  21. Verheijen-Voogd C (1959) How worker bees perceive the presence of their queen. Z Vergl Physiol 41:527–582Google Scholar
  22. Visscher PK (1989) A quantitative study of worker reproduction in honey bee colonies. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 25:247–254Google Scholar
  23. Willis LG, Winston ML, Slessor KN (1990) Queen honey bee mandibular pheromone does not affect worker ovary development. Can Entomol 122:1093–1099Google Scholar
  24. Winston ML, Slessor KN (1998) Honey bee primer pheromones and colony organization: gaps in our knowledge. Apidologie 29:81–95Google Scholar
  25. Wossler TC, Crewe RM (1999) Honeybee queen tergal gland secretion affects ovarian development in caged workers. Apidologie 30:31–320Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shelley E.R. Hoover
    • 1
  • Christopher I. Keeling
    • 2
    • 3
  • Mark L. Winston
    • 1
  • Keith N. Slessor
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesSimon Fraser UniversityBurnabyCanada
  2. 2.Department of ChemistrySimon Fraser UniversityBurnabyCanada
  3. 3.Department of BiochemistryUniversity of NevadaRenoUSA

Personalised recommendations