Naturwissenschaften

, Volume 90, Issue 5, pp 226–230 | Cite as

To see or not to see: does previewing a future opponent affect the contest behavior of green swordtail males (Xiphophorus helleri)?

  • Ryan L. Earley
  • Megan Tinsley
  • Lee Alan Dugatkin
Short Communication

Abstract

Animals assess the fighting ability of conspecifics either by engaging in aggressive interactions or observing contests between others. However, whether individuals assess physical prowess outside the context of aggressive interactions remains unknown. We examined whether male green swordtails (Xiphophorus helleri) extract information about the fighting ability of solitary individuals via observation and whether acquiring such information elicits behavioral modifications. Contests preceded by mutual visual assessment were significantly shorter than fights where only one or neither of the two individuals was informed in advance. Focal animals initiated aggressive behavior more often against larger opponents only after previewing their adversary, indicating that swordtails can extract information about relative body size from watching solitary conspecifics. When a fighting disadvantage is perceived, observers adopt tactics that increase their probability of winning the contest.

References

  1. Beaugrand JP (1997) Resolution of agonistic conflicts in dyads of acquainted green swordtails (Xiphophorus helleri, Pisces, Poeciliidae): a game with perfect information. Behav Proc 41:79–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beaugrand JP, Caron J, Comeau L (1984) Social organization of small heterosexual groups of green swordtails (Xiphophorus helleri, Pisces, Poeciliidae) under conditions of captivity. Behaviour 91:24–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Borowsky RL (1987) Agonistic behavior and social inhibition of maturation in fishes of the genus Xiphophorus (Poeciliidae). Copeia 1987:792–796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Earley RL, Dugatkin LA (2002) Eavesdropping on visual cues in green swordtail (Xiphophorus helleri) fights: a case for networking. Proc R Soc Lond B 269:943–952CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Enquist M, Leimar O (1983) Evolution of fighting behaviour: decision rules and assessment of relative strength. J Theor Biol 102:387–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Enquist M, Ljungberg T, Zandor A (1987) Visual assessment of fighting ability in the cichlid fish Nannacara anomala. Anim Behav 35:1262–1263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Enquist M, Leimar O, Ljungberg T, Mallner Y, Segerdahl N (1990) A test of the sequential assessment game: fighting in the cichlid fish, Nannacara anomala. Anim Behav 40:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Francis RC (1983) Experiential effects on agonistic behavior in the paradise fish, Macropodus opercularis. Behaviour 85:292–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Franck D, Ribowski A (1987) Influences of prior agonistic experiences on aggression measures in the male swordtail (Xiphophorus helleri). Behaviour 103: 217–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Franck D, Ribowski A (1989) Escalating fights for rank-order position between male swordtails (Xiphophorus helleri): effects of prior rank-order experience and information transfer. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 24:133–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Graves HB, Hable CP, Jenkins TH (1985) Sexual selection in Gallus: effects of morphology and dominance on female spatial behavior. Behav Proc 11:189–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Johnsson J, Åkerman A (1998) Watch and learn: preview of the fighting ability of opponents alters contest behaviour in rainbow trout. Anim Behav 56:771–776CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Keeley ER, Grant JWA (1993) Visual information, resource value, and sequential assessment in convict cichlid (Cichlasoma nigrofasciatum) contests. Behav Ecol 4:345–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. McGregor PK, Peake TM (2000) Communication networks: social environments for receiving and signalling behavior. Acta Ethol 2:71–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. McGregor PK, Peake TM, Lampe HM (2001) Fighting fish Betta splendens extract relative information from apparent interactions: what happens when what you see isn’t what you get. Anim Behav 62:1059–1065CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mesterton-Gibbons M, Adams E (1998) Animal contests as evolutionary games. Am Sci 86:334–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Morris MR, Mussel M, Ryan MJ (1995) Vertical bars on male Xiphophorus multilineatus: a signal that deters rival males and attracts females. Behav Ecol 6:274–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Oliveira RF, McGregor PK, Latruffe C (1998) Know thine enemy: fighting fish gather information from observing conspecific interactions. Proc R Soc Lond B 265:1045–1049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Overli O, Olsen RE, Lovik F, Ringo E (1999) Dominance hierarchies in Arctic charr, Salvelinus alpinus L.: differential cortisol profiles of dominant and subordinate individuals after handling stress. Aquac Res 30:259–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Payne R (1998) Gradually escalating fights and displays: the cumulative assessment model. Anim Behav 56:651–662CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Payne R, Pagel M (1997) Why do animals repeat displays? Anim Behav 54:109–119CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Peake TM, Terry AMR, McGregor PK, Dabelsteen T (2002) Do great tits assess rivals by combining direct experience with information gathered by eavesdropping? Proc R Soc Lond B 269:1925–1929CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ribowski A, Franck D (1993) Subordinate swordtail males escalate faster than dominants: a failure of the social conditioning principle. Aggress Behav 19:223–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rotllant J, Tort L (1997) Cortisol and glucose responses after acute stress by net handling in the sparid red porgy previously subjected to crowding stress. J Fish Biol 51:21–28CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Zar JH (1996) Biostatistical analysis, 3rd edn. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ryan L. Earley
    • 1
    • 3
  • Megan Tinsley
    • 2
  • Lee Alan Dugatkin
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biology, Life Sciences BuildingUniversity of LouisvilleLouisvilleUSA
  2. 2.Department of Ecology and Evolutionary BiologyUniversity of TennesseeKnoxvilleUSA
  3. 3.Department of BiologyGeorgia State UniversityAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations