Advertisement

Journal of Molecular Medicine

, Volume 96, Issue 3–4, pp 349–360 | Cite as

Imaging of cytotoxic antiviral immunity while considering the 3R principle of animal research

  • Lucas Otto
  • Gennadiy Zelinskyy
  • Marc Schuster
  • Ulf Dittmer
  • Matthias Gunzer
Original Article
  • 375 Downloads

Abstract

Adoptive cell transfer approaches for antigen-specific CD8+ T cells are used widely to study their effector potential during infections or cancer. However, contemporary methodological adaptations regarding transferred cell numbers, advanced imaging, and the 3R principle of animal research have been largely omitted. Here, we introduce an improved cell transfer method that reduces the number of donor animals substantially and fulfills the requirements for intravital imaging under physiological conditions. For this, we analyzed the well-established Friend retrovirus (FV) mouse model. Donor mice that expressed a FV-specific T cell receptor (TCRtg) and the fluorescent protein tdTomato were used as source of antigen-specific CD8+ T cells. Only a few drops of peripheral blood were sufficient to isolate ~ 150,000 naive reporter cells from which 1000 were adoptively transferred into recently FV-infected recipients. The cells became activated and functional and expanded strongly in the spleen and bone marrow within 10 days post infection. Transferred CD8+ T cells participated in the antiviral host response within a natural range and developed an effector phenotype indistinguishable from endogenous effector CD8+ T cells. Additionally, the generated reporter cell frequency allowed single cell visualization and tracking of a physiological antiretroviral CD8+ T cell response by intravital two-photon microscopy. Highly reproducible results were obtained in independent experiments by reusing the same donors repetitively for multiple transfers. Our approach allows a strong reduction of experimental animals required for studies on antigen-specific CD8+ T cell function and should be applicable to other transfer models.

Key messages

  • TCRtg CD8+ T cells are obtained repetitively from the blood samples of single donors.

  • One thousand transferred TCRtg CD8+ T cells get activated, are functional, and proliferate.

  • Several adoptive cell transfers from the same donor show reproducible results.

  • One thousand transferred cells take part in the FV immune response without modifying it.

  • Use of fluorescent transfer cells allows in vivo imaging and single cell tracking.

Keywords

Antigen-specific cytotoxic CD8+ T cells (CTL) Adoptive cell transfer Repetitive donor mouse usage Intravital imaging Retroviruses 3R principle 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The Imaging Center Essen (IMCES) is acknowledged for expert technical support in imaging experiments.

Author contribution

L.O. performed all experiments. G.Z. and M.S. provided essential support. L.O. and M.G. wrote the manuscript with the help of G.Z. and U.D. M.G. and U.D. conceived of and supervised the study.

Funding information

This work was supported by a grant to M.G., U.D., and G.Z. from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, TRR60, Projects B4 and B8), and the European Union (H2020, Multimot) to M.G. L.O. was trained in the DFG-funded RTG 1949.

Compliance with ethical standards

Animal experiments were conducted under strict consent with the German regulations of the Society for Laboratory Animal Science (GV-SOLAS) and the European Health Law of the Federation of Laboratory Animal Science Associations (FELASA). North Rhine-Westphalia State Agency for Nature, Environment and Consumer Protection (LANUV) approved all experiments and protocols.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

109_2018_1628_MOESM1_ESM.docx (17 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 16 kb)
109_2018_1628_MOESM2_ESM.docx (16 kb)
ESM 2 (DOCX 15 kb)
109_2018_1628_MOESM3_ESM.mpg (7.8 mb)
Supplementary Movie 1 (MPG 7950 kb)
109_2018_1628_Fig7_ESM.gif (213 kb)
Fig S1

(GIF 212 kb)

109_2018_1628_MOESM4_ESM.tif (20.3 mb)
High resolution image (TIFF 20803 kb)
109_2018_1628_Fig8_ESM.gif (81 kb)
Fig S2

(GIF 81 kb)

109_2018_1628_MOESM5_ESM.tif (11.4 mb)
High resolution image (TIFF 11662 kb)
109_2018_1628_Fig9_ESM.gif (241 kb)
Fig S3

(GIF 240 kb)

109_2018_1628_MOESM6_ESM.tif (16.7 mb)
High resolution image (TIFF 17138 kb)
109_2018_1628_Fig10_ESM.gif (588 kb)
ESM 3

(GIF 588 kb)

109_2018_1628_MOESM7_ESM.tif (4.5 mb)
High resolution image (TIFF 4578 kb)
109_2018_1628_Fig11_ESM.gif (439 kb)
ESM 4

(GIF 438 kb)

109_2018_1628_MOESM8_ESM.tif (3.2 mb)
High resolution image (TIFF 3255 kb)
109_2018_1628_Fig12_ESM.gif (317 kb)
ESM 5

(GIF 316 kb)

109_2018_1628_MOESM9_ESM.tif (3.3 mb)
High resolution image (TIFF 3387 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Halle S, Keyser KA, Stahl FR, Busche A, Marquardt A, Zheng X, Galla M, Heissmeyer V, Heller K, Boelter J, Wagner K, Bischoff Y, Martens R, Braun A, Werth K, Uvarovskii A, Kempf H, Meyer-Hermann M, Arens R, Kremer M, Sutter G, Messerle M, Förster R (2016) In vivo killing capacity of cytotoxic T cells is limited and involves dynamic interactions and T cell cooperativity. Immunity 44:233–245CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Schmitt A, Tonn T, Busch DH, Grigoleit GU, Einsele H, Odendahl M, Germeroth L, Ringhoffer M, Ringhoffer S, Wiesneth M, Greiner J, Michel D, Mertens T, Rojewski M, Marx M, von Harsdorf S, Döhner H, Seifried E, Bunjes D, Schmitt M (2011) Adoptive transfer and selective reconstitution of streptamer-selected cytomegalovirus-specific CD8+ T cells leads to virus clearance in patients after allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. Transfusion 51:591–599CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Stemberger C, Huster KM, Koffler M, Anderl F, Schiemann M, Wagner H, Busch DH (2007) A single naive CD8+ T cell precursor can develop into diverse effector and memory subsets. Immunity 27:985–997CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kamphorst AO, Wieland A, Nasti T, Yang S, Zhang R, Barber DL, Konieczny BT, Daugherty CZ, Koenig L, Yu K, Sica GL, Sharpe AH, Freeman GJ, Blazar BR, Turka LA, Owonikoko TK, Pillai RN, Ramalingam SS, Araki K, Ahmed R (2017) Rescue of exhausted CD8 T cells by PD-1-targeted therapies is CD28-dependent. Science 355:1423–1427CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dittmer U, He H, Messer RJ, Schimmer S, Olbrich AR, Ohlen C, Greenberg PD, Stromnes IM, Iwashiro M, Sakaguchi S et al (2004) Functional impairment of CD8(+) T cells by regulatory T cells during persistent retroviral infection. Immunity 20:293–303CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hukelmann JL, Anderson KE, Sinclair LV, Grzes KM, Murillo AB, Hawkins PT, Stephens LR, Lamond AI, Cantrell DA (2016) The cytotoxic T cell proteome and its shaping by the kinase mTOR. Nat Immunol 17:104–112CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Barchet W, Oehen S, Klenerman P, Wodarz D, Bocharov G, Lloyd AL, Nowak MA, Hengartner H, Zinkernagel RM, Ehl S (2000) Direct quantitation of rapid elimination of viral antigen-positive lymphocytes by antiviral CD8(+) T cells in vivo. Eur J Immunol 30:1356–1363CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Badovinac VP, Haring JS, Harty JT (2007) Initial T cell receptor transgenic cell precursor frequency dictates critical aspects of the CD8(+) T cell response to infection. Immunity 26:827–841CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Marzo AL, Klonowski KD, Le Bon A, Borrow P, Tough DF, Lefrancois L (2005) Initial T cell frequency dictates memory CD8+ T cell lineage commitment. Nat Immunol 6:793–799CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Blattman JN, Antia R, Sourdive DJ, Wang X, Kaech SM, Murali-Krishna K, Altman JD, Ahmed R (2002) Estimating the precursor frequency of naive antigen-specific CD8 T cells. J Exp Med 195:657–664CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Stock AT, Mueller SN, Kleinert LM, Heath WR, Carbone FR, Jones CM (2007) Optimization of TCR transgenic T cells for in vivo tracking of immune responses. Immunol Cell Biol 85:394–396CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Myers L, Hasenkrug KJ (2009) Retroviral immunology: lessons from a mouse model. Immunol Res 43:160–166CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hasenkrug KJ, Dittmer U (2007) Immune control and prevention of chronic Friend retrovirus infection. Front Biosci 12:1544–1551CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chen W, Qin H, Chesebro B, Cheever MA (1996) Identification of a gag-encoded cytotoxic T-lymphocyte epitope from FBL-3 leukemia shared by Friend, Moloney, and Rauscher murine leukemia virus-induced tumors. J Virol 70:7773–7782PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ohlen C, Kalos M, Cheng LE, Shur AC, Hong DJ, Carson BD, Kokot NC, Lerner CG, Sather BD, Huseby ES et al (2002) CD8(+) T cell tolerance to a tumor-associated antigen is maintained at the level of expansion rather than effector function. J Exp Med 195:1407–1418CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Germain RN, Robey EA, Cahalan MD (2012) A decade of imaging cellular motility and interaction dynamics in the immune system. Science 336:1676–1681CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mempel TR, Henrickson SE, von Andrian UH (2004) T-cell priming by dendritic cells in lymph nodes occurs in three distinct phases. Nature 427:154–159CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Breart B, Lemaitre F, Celli S, Bousso P (2008) Two-photon imaging of intratumoral CD8 T cell cytotoxic activity during adoptive T cell therapy in mice. J Clin Invest 118:1390–1397CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Eickhoff S, Brewitz A, Gerner MY, Klauschen F, Komander K, Hemmi H, Garbi N, Kaisho T, Germain RN, Kastenmuller W (2015) Robust anti-viral immunity requires multiple distinct T cell-dendritic cell interactions. Cell 162:1322–1337CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Liu Z, Gerner MY, Van PN, Levine AG, Rudensky AY, Germain RN (2015) Immune homeostasis enforced by co-localized effector and regulatory T cells. Nature 528:225–230CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Deguine J, Breart B, Lemaitre F, Di Santo JP, Bousso P (2010) Intravital imaging reveals distinct dynamics for natural killer and CD8(+) T cells during tumor regression. Immunity 33:632–644CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Beuneu H, Lemaitre F, Deguine J, Moreau HD, Bouvier I, Garcia Z, Albert ML, Bousso P (2010) Visualizing the functional diversification of CD8(+) T cell responses in lymph nodes. Immunity 33:412–423CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Scholer A, Hugues S, Boissonnas A, Fetler L, Amigorena S (2008) Intercellular adhesion molecule-1-dependent stable interactions between T cells and dendritic cells determine CD8+ T cell memory. Immunity 28:258–270CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gunzer M, Weishaupt C, Hillmer A, Basoglu Y, Friedl P, Dittmar KE, Kolanus W, Varga G, Grabbe S (2004) A spectrum of biophysical interaction modes between T cells and different antigen presenting cells during priming in 3-D collagen and in vivo. Blood 104:2801–2809CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Russell WMS, Burch RL (1959) The principles of humane experimental technique. Methuen, LondonGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lahl K, Loddenkemper C, Drouin C, Freyer J, Arnason J, Eberl G, Hamann A, Wagner H, Huehn J, Sparwasser T (2007) Selective depletion of Foxp3+ regulatory T cells induces a scurfy-like disease. J Exp Med 204:57–63CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Zhang DJ, Wang Q, Wei J, Baimukanova G, Buchholz F, Stewart AF, Mao X, Killeen N (2005) Selective expression of the Cre recombinase in late-stage thymocytes using the distal promoter of the Lck gene. J Immunol 174:6725–6731CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Madisen L, Zwingman TA, Sunkin SM, Oh SW, Zariwala HA, Gu H, Ng LL, Palmiter RD, Hawrylycz MJ, Jones AR, Lein ES, Zeng H (2010) A robust and high-throughput Cre reporting and characterization system for the whole mouse brain. Nat Neurosci 13:133–140CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lilly F, Steeves RA (1973) B-tropic Friend virus: a host-range pseudotype of spleen focus-forming virus (SFFV). Virology 55:363–370CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Robertson SJ, Ammann CG, Messer RJ, Carmody AB, Myers L, Dittmer U, Nair S, Gerlach N, Evans LH, Cafruny WA, Hasenkrug KJ (2008) Suppression of acute anti-friend virus CD8+ T-cell responses by coinfection with lactate dehydrogenase-elevating virus. J Virol 82:408–418CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Grupillo M, Lakomy R, Geng X, Styche A, Rudert WA, Trucco M, Fan Y (2011) An improved intracellular staining protocol for efficient detection of nuclear proteins in YFP-expressing cells. BioTechniques 51:417–420CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Köhler A, De Filippo K, Hasenberg M, van den Brandt C, Nye E, Hosking MP, Lane TE, Männ L, Ransohoff RM, Hauser AE et al (2011) G-CSF mediated thrombopoietin release triggers neutrophil motility and mobilization from bone marrow via induction of Cxcr2 ligands. Blood 117:4349–4357CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Robertson MN, Miyazawa M, Mori S, Caughey B, Evans LH, Hayes SF, Chesebro B (1991) Production of monoclonal antibodies reactive with a denatured form of the Friend murine leukemia virus gp70 envelope protein: use in a focal infectivity assay, immunohistochemical studies, electron microscopy and western blotting. J Virol Methods 34:255–271CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Berke G (1994) The binding and lysis of target cells by cytotoxic lymphocytes: molecular and cellular aspects. Annu Rev Immunol 12:735–773CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Betts MR, Brenchley JM, Price DA, De Rosa SC, Douek DC, Roederer M, Koup RA (2003) Sensitive and viable identification of antigen-specific CD8+ T cells by a flow cytometric assay for degranulation. J Immunol Methods 281:65–78CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Zelinskyy G, Dietze KK, Husecken YP, Schimmer S, Nair S, Werner T, Gibbert K, Kershaw O, Gruber AD, Sparwasser T, Dittmer U (2009) The regulatory T-cell response during acute retroviral infection is locally defined and controls the magnitude and duration of the virus-specific cytotoxic T-cell response. Blood 114:3199–3207CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Mazo IB, Honczarenko M, Leung H, Cavanagh LL, Bonasio R, Weninger W, Engelke K, Xia L, McEver RP, Koni PA et al (2005) Bone marrow is a major reservoir and site of recruitment for central memory CD8+ T cells. Immunity 22:259–270CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Miller MJ, Hejazi AS, Wei SH, Cahalan MD, Parker I (2004) T cell repertoire scanning is promoted by dynamic dendritic cell behavior and random T cell motility in the lymph node. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101:998–1003CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Gunzer M, Schäfer A, Borgmann S, Grabbe S, Zänker KS, Bröcker E-B, Kämpgen E, Friedl P (2000) Antigen presentation in extracellular matrix: interactions of T cells with dendritic cells are dynamic, short lived, and sequential. Immunity 13:323–332CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Yoon H, Kim TS, Braciale TJ (2010) The cell cycle time of CD8+ T cells responding in vivo is controlled by the type of antigenic stimulus. PLoS One 5:e15423.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0015423 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Newell EW, Sigal N, Bendall SC, Nolan GP, Davis MM (2012) Cytometry by time-of-flight shows combinatorial cytokine expression and virus-specific cell niches within a continuum of CD8+ T cell phenotypes. Immunity 36:142–152CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Giovanoli S, Engler H, Engler A, Richetto J, Voget M, Willi R, Winter C, Riva MA, Mortensen PB, Feldon J, Schedlowski M, Meyer U (2013) Stress in puberty unmasks latent neuropathological consequences of prenatal immune activation in mice. Science 339:1095–1099CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Experimental Immunology and Imaging, University Hospital EssenUniversity Duisburg-EssenEssenGermany
  2. 2.Institute for Virology, University Hospital EssenUniversity Duisburg-EssenEssenGermany

Personalised recommendations