Advertisement

European Journal of Wood and Wood Products

, Volume 77, Issue 6, pp 981–994 | Cite as

Development of plywood using geopolymer as binder: effect of silica fume on the plywood and binder characteristics

  • Masoud Bahrami
  • Ali ShalbafanEmail author
  • Johannes Welling
Original
First Online:
  • 151 Downloads

Abstract

Geopolymers show good potential to be used as free formaldehyde-based binder to produce wood-based panels. Hence, the objective of this research was to investigate the geopolymer composition as binder on the physical and mechanical properties of multi-layered plywood. The geopolymer binder was prepared based on kaolin and metakaolin as the major aluminosilicate powder that were substituted with different contents of silica fume. The results showed that the substitution of aluminosilicate with silica fume (up to 20% based on weight) in the geopolymer mixture modified the chemistry of the geopolymerisation, and hence, improved the amorphous structures of the geopolymer binder. In summary, the substitution of aluminosilicate with silica fume (up to 20% based on weight) in the geopolymer mixture improved the geopolymer binder cohesion, reduced the binder viscosity, reduced the binder curing time, increased the binder penetration into the superficial wood cells, increased the binder shear strength, increased the bending strength of plywood, and accordingly, reduced the plywood stiffness. Notably, none of the plywood samples did delaminate even after 672 h water immersion, implying that the geopolymer binder-based products have a better stability in water compared to some organic binders (e.g., adhesives based on tannin, soya and starch), which suffer from hydrolysis after immersion in water. All in all, the geopolymer binder based on metakaolin showed promising potential to be used as formaldehyde-free binder to produce plywood.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Ali Shalbafan acknowledges the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD) (Grant no. 95848907) for awarding him a short-term scientific mission on 2017 at Thuenen Institute of Wood Research (Hamburg, Germany). The authors would also gratefully acknowledge the Wöllner GmbH, Ferropem and Elkam AS companies for kindly supplying the materials.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ambroise J, Maximilien S, Pera J (1994) Properties of metakaolin blended cements. Adv Cem Based Mater 1:161–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Autef A, Joussein E, Gasgnier G et al (2013) Role of metakaolin dehydroxylation in geopolymer synthesis. Powder Technol 250:33–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berzins A, Morozovs A, Van Den Bulcke J, Van Acker J (2017a) Softwood surface compatibility with inorganic geopolymer. Adv Mater Proc 2:793–798CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berzins A, Morozovs A, Gross U, Iejavs J (2017b) Mechanical properties of wood–geopolymer composite. Eng Rural Dev 16:1167–1173Google Scholar
  5. Bouafif H, Koubaa A, Perré P et al (2008) Analysis of among-species variability in wood fiber surface using DRIFTS and XPS: effects on esterification efficiency. J Wood Chem Technol 28:296–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen T, Niu M, Xie Y et al (2015) Modification of ultra-low density fiberboards by an inorganic film formed by Si–Al deposition and their mechanical properties. BioResources 10:538–547Google Scholar
  7. Chen L, Wang Z, Wang Y, Feng J (2016a) Preparation and properties of alkali activated metakaolin-based geopolymer. Materials 9:1–12Google Scholar
  8. Chen T, Wu Z, Niu M et al (2016b) Effect of Si–Al molar ratio on microstructure and mechanical properties of ultra-low density fiberboard. Eur J Wood Prod 74:151–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Costa NA, Pereira J, Ferra J et al (2013) Scavengers for achieving zero formaldehyde emission of wood-based panels. Wood Sci Technol 47:1261–1272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Davidovits J (2008) Geopolymer Chemistry and Applications, 2nd edn. Institute Geopolymere, Saint-QuentinGoogle Scholar
  11. EN 310 (1993) Wood-based panels—determination of modulus of elasticity in bending and of bending strength. European Committee for Standardization, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  12. EN 314-1 (2005) Plywood. Bonding quality. Part 1: test methods. European Committee for standardization, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  13. EN 314-2 (1993) Plywood. Bonding quality. Part 2: requirements. European Committee for standardization, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  14. EN 317 (1993) Particleboards and fibreboards—determination of swelling in thickness after immersion in water. European Committee for Standardization, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  15. Faix O, Böttcher JH (1992) The influence of particle size and concentration in transmission and diffuse reflectance spectroscopy of wood. Holz Roh-Werkst 50:221–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. FAO (2017) Global forest products: facts and figures. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United NationsGoogle Scholar
  17. Ghafari R, DoostHosseini K, Abdulkhani A, Mirshokraie SA (2016) Replacing formaldehyde by furfural in urea formaldehyde resin: effect on formaldehyde emission and physical–mechanical properties of particleboards. Eur J Wood Prod 74:609–616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gouny F, Fouchal F, Maillard P, Rossignol S (2014) Study of the effect of siliceous species in the formation of a geopolymer binder: understanding the reaction mechanisms among the binder, wood, and earth brick. Ind Eng Chem Res 53:3559–3569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hassannejad H, Shalbafan A, Rahmaninia M (2018) Reduction of formaldehyde emission from medium density fiberboard by chitosan as scavenger. J Adhes 8464:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hemmilä V, Adamopoulos S, Karlsson O, Kumar A (2017) Development of sustainable bio-adhesives for engineered wood panels—a review. RSC Adv 7:38604–38630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kazayawoko M, Balatinecz JJ, Woodhams RT (1997) Diffuse reflectance Fourier transform infrared spectra of wood fibers treated with maleated polypropylenes. J Appl Polym Sci 66:1163–1173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Khater HM (2013) Effect of silica fume on the characterization of the geopolymer materials. Int J Adv Struct Eng 5:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kim S (2009) The reduction of indoor air pollutant from wood-based composite by adding pozzolan for building materials. Constr Build Mater 23:2319–2323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Park B-D, Lee S-M, Roh J-K (2009) Effects of formaldehyde/urea mole ratio and melamine content on the hydrolytic stability of cured urea-melamine-formaldehyde resin. Eur J Wood Prod 67:121–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Prud’homme E, Michaud P, Joussein E et al (2010a) Silica fume as porogent agent in geo-materials at low temperature. J Eur Ceram Soc 30:1641–1648.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2010.01.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Prud’homme E, Michaud P, Peyratout C et al (2010b) Geomaterial foam to reinforce wood. Strateg Mater Comput Des Ceram Eng Sci Proc 31:3–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Roffael E (2006) Volatile organic compounds and formaldehyde in nature, wood and wood based panels. Holz Roh-Werkst 64:144–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sarmin SN, Welling J, Krause A, Shalbafan A (2014) Investigating the possibility of geopolymer to produce inorganic-bonded wood composites for multifunctional construction material—a review. BioResources 9:7941–7950Google Scholar
  29. Shalbafan A, Welling J, Hasch J (2016) Geopolymers as potential new binder class for the wood based composite industry. Holzforschung 70:755–761CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Shalbafan A, Welling J, Hasch J (2017) Effect of aluminosilicate powders on the applicability of innovative geopolymer binders for wood-based composites. Eur J Wood Prod 75:893–902CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Singh N (2018) Fly ash-based geopolymer binder: a future construction material. Minerals 8:299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sitarz M, Handke M, Mozgawa W et al (2000) The non-ring cations influence on silicooxygen ring vibrations. J Mol Struct 555:357–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Xu H, Van Deventer JSJ (2000) The geopolymerisation of alumino-silicate minerals. Int J Miner Process 59:247–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ye H, Zhang Y, Yu Z, Mu J (2018) Effects of cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin on the morphology and mechanical properties of metakaolin-based geopolymer. Constr Build Mater 173:10–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Yu Y, Xu P, Chen C et al (2018) Formaldehyde emission behavior of plywood with phenol-formaldehyde resin modified by bio-oil under radiant floor heating condition. Build Environ 144:565–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zhang Z, Provis JL, Reid A, Wang H (2014) Geopolymer foam concrete: an emerging material for sustainable construction. Constr Build Mater 56:113–127.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.01.081 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Wood and Paper Science and Technology, Faculty of Natural Resources and Marine SciencesTarbiat Modares UniversityNoorIran
  2. 2.Thünen-Institute of Wood ResearchHamburgGermany

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options