Advertisement

The impact of application of FSC Chain of Custody certification on global wood products trade

  • Zhijie GuanEmail author
  • Yan Xu
  • Jim Ip Ping Sheong
Original
  • 18 Downloads

Abstract

FSC Chain of Custody (CoC) certification effectively proves that the timber being used originates from sustainably managed forests, and a large number of wood products have been FSC CoC certified. This paper examines the impacts of the application of FSC CoC certification on the international trade of wood products. The analysis is conducted using the Heckscher–Ohlin–Vanek model, where the number of FSC CoC certificates is used to describe the level of application, and is included as an explanatory variable for national net export of wood products. The results show that the application has had significant and positive impacts on the net export of sawnwood, particleboard, plywood, wood furniture and fibreboard, while it has had significant and negative impacts on the net export of roundwood. The present findings imply that more sawnwood, particleboard, plywood, wood furniture and fibreboard in the global market have been FSC CoC certified than roundwood and veneer sheet in meeting the demand for legal products. Therefore, it is necessary to encourage more companies to apply FSC CoC certification to roundwood and veneer sheet.

Notes

Funding

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Aguilar FX, Cai Z (2010) Conjoint effect of environmental labeling, disclosure of forest of origin and price on consumer preferences for wood products in the US and UK. Ecol Econ 70:308–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aguilar FX, Vlosky RP (2007) Consumer willingness to pay price premiums for environmentally certified wood products in the US. For Policy Econ 9:1100–1112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Archer H, Kozak R, Balsillie D (2005) The impact of forest certification labeling and advertising: an exploratory assessment of consumer purchase intent in Canada. For Chron 81:229–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baldwin R, Taglioni D (2007) Trade effects of the euro: a comparison of estimators. J Econ Integr 22(4):780–818CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bonnefoi B, Buongiorno J (1990) Comparative advantage of countries in forest-products trade. For Ecol Manag 36:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bowen HP, Leamer EE, Sveikauskas L (1987) Multicountry, multi-factor tests of the factor abundance theory. Am Econ Rev 77:791–809Google Scholar
  7. Brack D (2014) Promoting legal and sustainable timber: using public procurement policy. Chatham House. http://www.chathamhouse.org/sites/files/chathamhouse/field/field_document/h20140908PromotingLegalSustainableTimberBrackFinal.pdf. Accessed 23 May 2018
  8. Buliga B, Nichiforel L (2019) Voluntary forest certification vs. stringent legal frameworks: Romania as a case study. J Clean Prod 207:329–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carodenuto S, Cerutti PO (2014) Forest law enforcement, governance and trade (FLEGT) in cameroon: perceived private sector benefits from VPA implementation. For Policy Econ 48:55–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chen J, Innes JL, Tikina A (2010) Private cost-benefits of voluntary forest product certification. Int For Rev 12(1):1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dasgupta S, Mody A, Roy S, Wheeler D (2001) Environmental regulation and development: a cross country empirical analysis. Oxf Dev Stud 29:173–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Deardorff A (1998) Determinants of bilateral trade: does gravity work in a neoclassical world? In: Frankel JA (ed) The regionalization of the world economy. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, p 21Google Scholar
  13. Durst PB, McKenzie P (2006) Challenges facing certification and Eco-Labelling of forest products in developing countries. Int For Rev 8:193–200Google Scholar
  14. Ebeling J, Yasue M (2009) The effectiveness of market-based conservation in the tropics: forest certification in Ecuador and Bolivia. J Environ Manag 90:1145–1153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Environmental Investigation Agency (2015). The Lacey Act’s effectiveness in reducing illegal wood imports. Union of Concerned Scientist. https://www.ucsusa.org/sites/default/files/attach/2015/10/ucs-lacey-report-2015.pdf. Accessed 23 May 2018
  16. Eriksson LO, Sallnas O, Stahl G (2007) Forest certification and Swedish wood supply. For Policy Econ 9:452–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Espinoza O, Buehlmann U, Smith B (2012) Forest certification and green building standards: overview and use in the U.S. hardwood industry. J Clean Prod 33:30–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Estevadeordal A, Taylor M (2002) A century of missing trade? Am Econ Rev 92:383–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. European Commission (2016) Evaluation of the EU FLEGT Action Plan (Forest Law Enforcement Governance and Trade) 2004–2014. Evaluation Report Volume 1. https://ec.europa.eu/europeaid/sites/devco/files/report-flegt-evaluation.pdf. Accessed 23 May 2018
  20. Feenstra RC (2004) The Heckscher–Ohlin model. Advanced international trade: theory and evidence. University Press, Princeton, pp 31–63Google Scholar
  21. Feenstra RC, Markusen JR, Rose AK (2001) Using the gravity equation to differentiate among alternative theories of trade. Can J Econ 34:430–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fischer C, Aguilar F, Jawahar P, Sedjo R (2005) Forest certification: toward common standards?. Resources for the Future, Washington, pp 71–88Google Scholar
  23. Galati A, Gianguzzi G, Tinervia S, Crescimanno M, Veca DSLM (2017) Motivations, adoption and impact of voluntary environmental certification in the Italian Forest based industry: the case of the FSC standard. For Policy Econ 83:169–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gan JB (2005) Forest certification costs and global forest product markets and trade: a general equilibrium analysis. Can J For Res 35:1731–1743CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gilani HR, Kozak RA, Innes JL (2016) The state of innovation in the British Columbia value-added wood products sector: the example of chain of custody certification. Can J For Res 46(8):1067–1075CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Guan ZJ, Gong PC (2015) The impacts of international efforts to reduce illegal logging on China’s forest products trade flow. China Agric Econ Rev 7:467–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Guan ZJ, Xu Y (2018) The policy analysis of governing illegal logging: a game theory approach. J Sustain For 37:727–738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Guan ZJ, Shen J, Jia WG (2010) Substituting effects of forest certification in substituting tariff barriers. J Beijing For Univ (Soc Sci) 9:110–113Google Scholar
  29. Guan ZJ, Xu Y, Gong PC, Cao JH (2018) The impact of international efforts to reduce illegal logging on the global trade in wood products. Int Wood Prod J 9:28–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hackett R (2013) From government to governance? Forest certification and crisis displacement in Ontario, Canada. J Rural Stud 30:120–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Heckscher E (1919) The effects of foreign trade on the distribution of income. In: American Economic Association, Translated as chapter 13. Ekonomisk Tidskriff, Stockholm, pp 497–512Google Scholar
  32. Henrya LA, Tysiachnioukb M (2018) The uneven response to global environmental governance: Russia’s contentious politics of forest certification. For Policy Econ 90:97–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. James AM (1993) Essays in international trade and the environment: applications of Heckscher–Ohlin and non-traditional trade theories. Doctoral Dissertation 1748, University of New Hampshire, Durham. https://scholars.unh.edu/dissertation/1748. Accessed 23 May 2018
  34. Lawson S, MacFaul L (2010) Illegal logging and related trade: indicators of the global response. chatham house: the Royal Institute of International affairs. https://www.chathamhouse.org/publications/papers/view/109398. Accessed 23 May 2018
  35. Learner E (1984) Sources of international comparative advantage. MIT Press, Massachusetts, pp 103–133Google Scholar
  36. Li JQ, Chen SZ (2015) Empirical analysis on the practical feasibility of timber legality verification work in China. Open J Polit Sci 5:167–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Liu YZ, Tian ZH (2007) A test on comparative advantages in world and Chinese forest products trade. China Agric Econ Rev 1:28–45Google Scholar
  38. Lu ZY, Eastin I, Ganguly I (2015) The effects of the 2008 lacey act amendment on chinese companies in the forest products industry. CINTRAFOR Newsletter. Summer 1:4–8Google Scholar
  39. Lundmark R (2010) European trade in forest products and fuels. J For Econ 16:235–251Google Scholar
  40. Marasenia TN, Sonb HL, Cockfielda G, Duyb HV, Nghiac TD (2017) The financial benefits of forest certification: case studies of acacia growers and a furniture company in Central Vietnam. Land Use Policy 69:56–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Maskus KE (1985) A test of the Heckscher–Ohlin–Vanek theorem: the Leontief commonplace. J Int Econ 19:201–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. McDermott CL (2012) Trust, legitimacy and power in forest certification: a case study of the FSC in British Columbia. Geoforum 43:634–644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. McDermott CL, Irland LC, Pacheco P (2015) Forest certification and legality initiatives in the lessons for effective and equitable forest governance. For Policy Econ 50:134–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Miles MP, Covin JG (2000) Environmental marketing: a source of reputational, competitive, and financial advantage. J Bus Ethics 23:299–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Moroney JR, Walker JM (1966) A regional test of the Heckscher–Ohlin hypothesis. J Polit Econ 74:573–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Nguyen TQ, Tran HN (2011) How Viet Nam is prepared to meet legal requirements of timber export markets, vol X-44. Tropenbos International Viet Nam, Hue CityGoogle Scholar
  47. Niedziałkowski K, Shkaruba A (2018) Governance and legitimacy of the Forest Stewardship Council certification in the national contexts—a comparative study of Belarus and Poland. For Policy Econ 97:180–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. O’Brien KA, Teisl MF (2004) Eco-information and its effect on consumer values for environmentally certified forest products. J For Econ 10:75–96Google Scholar
  49. Ohlin B (1933) Interregional and international trade. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 105–118Google Scholar
  50. Owari T, Juslin H, Rummukainen A, Yoshimura T (2006) Strategies, functions and benefits of forest certification in wood products marketing: perspectives of Finnish suppliers. For Policy Econ 9:380–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Panda R, Sethi M, Chaudhuri S (2016) Changing paradigm in trade theories: a review and future research agenda. Indian J Sci Technol 9:1–6Google Scholar
  52. Perera P, Vlosky RP (2006) A history of forest certification. Louisiana forest products development center. http://www.lfpdc.lsu.edu/publications/working_papers/wp71.pdf. Accessed 23 May 2018
  53. Pinto LFG, McDermott C (2013) Equity and forest certification—a case study in Brazil. For Policy Econ 30:23–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Prestemon J, Buongiorno J (1997) Comparative advantage in forest products trade: a test of the Heckscher–Ohlin–Vanek theorem with interstate data. J For Econ 3:207–228Google Scholar
  55. Qiu YW, Yang G (2007) The impact of green trade barrier on chinese forestry products export and countermeasures. J Int Trade 5:23–28Google Scholar
  56. Riera P, Aranda L, Mavsar R (2007) Efficiency and equity of forest policies: a graphic analysis using the partial equilibrium framework. For Policy Econ 9:852–861CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Schwarzbauer P, Rametsteiner E (2001) The impact of SFM-certification on forest product markets in Western Europe an analysis using a forest sector simulation model. For Policy Econ 2:241–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Sen S (2010) International trade theory and policy: a review of the literature. Levy Economics Institute Working Papers Series No. 635. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1713843 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1713843. Accessed 23 May 2018
  59. Styles D, Schoenberger H, Martos JLG (2012) Environmental improvement of product supply chains: a review of European retailers’ performance. Resour Conserv Recycl 65:57–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Toit LD, Fourie J, Trew D (2010) The sources of comparative advantage in tourism. Working Papers 01/2010, Stellenbosch University, Department of Economics. https://ideas.repec.org/p/sza/wpaper/wpapers100.html. Accessed 23 May 2018
  61. Tricallotis M, Gunningham N, Kanowski P (2018) The impacts of forest certification for Chilean forestry businesses. For Policy Econ 92:82–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Upton C, Bass S (1996) The forest certification handbook. St. Lucie Press, Florida, pp 60–88Google Scholar
  63. Uusivuori J, Tervo M (2002) Comparative advantage and forest endowment in forest products trade: evidence from panel data of OECD-countries. J For Econ 8:53–75Google Scholar
  64. Vanek J (1963) The natural resource content of united states foreign trade. MIT Press, Massachusetts, pp 78–98Google Scholar
  65. Vanek J (1968) The factor proportions theory: the N-factors case. Kyklos 21:749–756CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Verter N (2016) The Heckscher–Ohlin model and the performance of cocoa products in Nigeria. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis 64:2161–2172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Viana V, Gholz H, Donovan R (1996) Certification of forest products: issues and perspectives. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 48–63Google Scholar
  68. Vidal N, Kozak R, Cohen D (2005) Chain of custody certification: an assessment of the North American solid wood sector. For Policy Econ 7:345–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Vogt KA, Larson BC, Fanzeres A (2000) Forest certification: roots, issues, challenges, and benefits. CRP Press, Connecticut, pp 33–47Google Scholar
  70. Wagner E, Hansen E (2005) Innovation in large versus small companies: insights from the U.S. wood products industry. Manag Decis 43(6):837–850CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Wiersum KF, Elands BHM (2013) Opinions on legality principles considered in the FLEGT/VPA policy in Ghana and Indonesia. For Policy Econ 32:14–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Yamamoto Y, Takeuchi K, Shinkuma T (2014) Is there a price premium for certified wood? Empirical evidence from log auction data in Japan. For Policy Econ 38:168–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of BusinessChangzhou UniversityChangzhouPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations