Stress wave evaluation by accelerometer and acoustic emission sensor for thermally modified wood classification using three types of neural networks
- 113 Downloads
Classification of thermally modified wood (TMW) allowing the distinction between different processing temperatures and the corresponding changes in wood properties is a crucial task in TMW grading. In this study, stress wave evaluation technique was used to classify the heat treatment level. Accordingly, an acoustic emission (AE) sensor and a pair of accelerometers captured stress waves generated by pendulum impact, and the data was used to classify the heat treatment level of thermally modified Western hemlock wood samples. Sensory features were extracted from time, frequency, and wavelet domain analysis. The extracted features were then used to train multilayer perceptron (MLP), group method of data handling (GMDH), and linear vector quantization (LVQ) neural networks for TMW classification. The results showed that while the features extracted from the accelerometers such as stress wave velocity and wood dynamic modulus of elasticity showed poor classification performance, acoustic emission sensory features were effective for classification of TMW. Wavelet domain features lead to better classification than those extracted from time and frequency domains. Feature fusion approach comprising the features from all the signal domains showed the best classification performance that was further improved by using a dimensionality reduction approach. The linear discriminant analysis was conducted on all acoustic emission features and resulted in 91.1% and 89.1% accuracy obtained from the LVQ and GMDH network, respectively. This performance was further increased to 98% and 97% using the LVQ and GMDH models when the input was combined with wood moisture content. The MLP neural network did not seem as suitable as the other two models. Neural network modeling using the captured stress wave data from an AE sensor could therefore be a promising nondestructive evaluation method for TMW classification.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
There is no conflict of interest associated with this research.
- Del Menezzi CHS, Amorim MR, Costa MA, Garcez LR (2014) Evaluation of thermally modified wood by means of stress wave and ultrasound nondestructive methods. Mater Sci 20(1):61–66Google Scholar
- Esteves B, Pereira H (2009) Wood modification by heat treatment: a review. BioResources 4(1):370–404Google Scholar
- González-Peña MM, Hale MD (2009a) Colour in thermally modified wood of beech, Norway spruce and Scots pine. Part 1: colour evolution and colour changes. Holzforschung 63(4):385–393Google Scholar
- González-Peña MM, Hale MD (2009b) Colour in thermally modified wood of beech, Norway spruce and Scots pine. Part 2: Property predictions from colour changes. Holzforschung 63(4):394–401Google Scholar
- Hinterstoisser B, Schwanninger M, Stefke B, Stingl R, Patzelt M (2003) Surface analyses of chemically and thermally modified wood by FT-NIR. In: Acker VJ, Hill C (eds) The 1st European conference on wood modification. Proceeding of the first international conference of the European society for wood mechanics. Ghent University, Belgium, pp 15–20Google Scholar
- Kim KB, Kang HY, Yoon DJ, Choi MY (2005) Pattern classification of acoustic emission signals during wood drying by principal component analysis and artificial neural network. Key Eng Mater 297:1962–1967. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.297-300.1962 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lin WS, Wu JZ (2013) Study on application of stress wave for nondestructive test of wood defects. Appl Mech Mater 401:1119–1123. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.401-403.1119 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Schnabel T, Zimmer B, Petutschnigg AJ, Schönberger S (2007) An approach to classify thermally modified hardwoods by color. For Products J 57(9):105–110Google Scholar