Advertisement

European Journal of Wood and Wood Products

, Volume 77, Issue 1, pp 115–123 | Cite as

Cu thin films on wood surface for robust superhydrophobicity by magnetron sputtering treatment with perfluorocarboxylic acid

  • Wenhui Bao
  • Ming Zhang
  • Zhen Jia
  • Yue Jiao
  • Liping Cai
  • Daxin LiangEmail author
  • Jian LiEmail author
Original
  • 96 Downloads

Abstract

Superhydrophobic wood was fabricated using a magnetron sputtering method, which can be applied to substrates with different shapes for its facile and controllable advantages. Copper was deposited on the cross-section surface of pristine wood followed by a treatment of perfluorocarboxylic acid. The results revealed that the deposition thickness played an important role in varying the surface morphology. In the optimized condition, water contract angle (CA) and sliding angle can reach 154° and 3.5°, respectively, when the deposition thickness was 50 nm. More importantly, the superhydrophobic surface can resist up to 100 times impingement of sand abrasion, and CA retained to be 151°. This method will have promising applications in wooden artifacts, such as clock frame, art, carvings and decorations.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2572016AB64, 2572018BB05), National Natural Science Foundation of China (31470584 and 31400497), State Key Laboratory of Bio-Fibers and Eco-Textiles (2017kfkt06) and Overseas Expertise Introduction Project for Discipline Innovation, 111 Project (no. B08016).

Supplementary material

107_2018_1366_MOESM1_ESM.docx (1.2 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 1216 KB)

References

  1. And BQ, Shen Z (2005) Fabrication of superhydrophobic surfaces by dislocation-selective chemical etching on aluminum, copper, and zinc substrates. Langmuir J Surf Colloids 21:9007–9009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bang KH, Hwang DK, Jeong MC, Sohn KS, Myoung JM (2003) Comparative studies on structural and optical properties of ZnO films grown on c-plane sapphire and GaAs (001) by MOCVD. Solid State Commun 126:623–627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cassie ABD (1944) Wettability of porous surfaces. Trans Faraday Soc 40:546–551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Deng X, Mammen L, Butt HJ, Vollmer D (2012) Candle soot as a template for a transparent robust superamphiphobic coating. Science 335:67–70.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1207115 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Feng L et al (2002) Super-hydrophobic surfaces: from natural to artificial. Adv Mater 14:1857–1860.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.200290020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gao L, Lu Y, Cao J, Li J, Sun Q (2015a) Reversible photocontrol of wood-surface wettability between superhydrophilicity and superhydrophobicity based on a TiO2 film. J Wood Chem Technol 35:365–373.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02773813.2014.984078 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gao L, Xiao S, Gan W, Zhan X, Li J (2015b) Durable superamphiphobic wood surfaces from Cu2O film modified with fluorinated alkyl silane. RSC Adv 5:98203–98208.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c5ra19433d CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gao L, Lu Y, Li J, Sun Q (2016) Superhydrophobic conductive wood with oil repellency obtained by coating with silver nanoparticles modified by fluoroalkyl silane. Holzforschung 70:63–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hill CAS (2006) Wood modification: chemical, thermal and other processes. Wiley, New York.  https://doi.org/10.1002/0470021748 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Inoue M, Hashizume K, Tsuchikawa H (1988) The properties of aluminum thin films sputter deposited at elevated temperatures. J Vac Sci Technol A Vac Surf Films 6:1636–1639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jin C, Yao Q, Li J, Fan B, Sun Q (2015) Fabrication, superhydrophobicity, and microwave absorbing properties of the magnetic γ-Fe2O3/bamboo composites. Mater Des 85:205–210.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2015.07.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kang W, Lee NH (2002) Mathematical modeling to predict drying deformation and stress due to the differential shrinkage within a tree disk Wood. Sci Technol 36:463–476.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00226-002-0153-5 Google Scholar
  13. Kang W, Lee NH (2004) Relationship between radial variations in shrinkage and drying defects of tree disks. J Wood Sci 50:209–216.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10086-003-0559-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kelly PJ, Arnell RD (2000) Magnetron sputtering: a review of recent developments. Vacuum 56:159–172.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0042-207X(99)00189-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Khedir KR, Kannarpady GK, Ishihara H, Woo J, Ryerson C, Biris AS (2010) Morphology control of tungsten nanorods grown by glancing angle RF magnetron sputtering under variable argon pressure and flow rate. Phys Lett A 374:4430–4437.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2010.08.066 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kozono Y, Komuro M, Narishige S, Hanazono M, Sugita Y (1987) Structures and magnetic properties of Fe/Cu multilayered films fabricated by a magnetron sputtering method. J Appl Phys 61:4311.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.338457 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lafuma A, Quéré D (2003) Superhydrophobic states. Nat Mater 2:457–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Li J, Yu H, Sun Q, Liu Y, Cui Y, Lu Y (2010) Growth of TiO2 coating on wood surface using controlled hydrothermal method at low temperatures. Appl Surf Sci 256:5046–5050.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.03.053 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Li X, Liu C, Shi T, Lei Y, Zhang Q, Zhou C, Huang X (2017) Preparation of multifunctional Al alloys substrates based on micro/nanostructures and surface modification. Mater Des 122:21–30.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2017.02.092 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lin Y, Shen Y, Liu A, Zhu Y, Liu S, Jiang H (2016) Bio-inspiredly fabricating the hierarchical 3D porous structure superhydrophobic surfaces for corrosion prevention. Mater Des 103:300–307.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2016.04.083 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Liu K, Jiang L (2011) Metallic surfaces with special wettability. Nanoscale 3:825–838.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c0nr00642d CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mukherjee SK, Joshi L, Barhai PK (2011) A comparative study of nanocrystalline Cu film deposited using anodic vacuum arc and dc magnetron sputtering. Surf Coat Technol 205:4582–4595.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2011.03.119 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nosonovsky M (2007) On the range of applicability of the Wenzel and Cassie equations. Langmuir J Surf Colloids 23:9919–9920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pang SC, Anderson MA (2000) Novel electrode materials for thin-film ultracapacitors: comparison of electrochemical properties of sol-gel-derived and electrodeposited manganese dioxide. J Electrochem Soc 147:444–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Reina A et al (2009) Large area, few-layer graphene films on arbitrary substrates by chemical vapor deposition. Nano Lett 9:655–663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sun Q, Lu Y, Liu Y (2011) Growth of hydrophobic TiO2 on wood surface using a hydrothermal method. J Mater Sci 46:7706–7712.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-011-5750-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sun Q et al (2012) Hydrothermal fabrication of rutile TiO2 submicrospheres on wood surface: an efficient method to prepare UV-protective wood. Mater Chem Phys 133:253–258.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2012.01.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wang Q, Zhang B, Qu M, Zhang J, He D (2008) Fabrication of superhydrophobic surfaces on engineering material surfaces with stearic acid. Appl Surf Sci 254:2009–2012.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2007.08.039 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wang C, Piao C, Lucas C (2011) Synthesis and characterization of superhydrophobic wood surfaces. J Appl Polym Sci 119:1667–1672.  https://doi.org/10.1002/app.32844 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wang S, Wang C, Liu C, Zhang M, Ma H, Li J (2012) Fabrication of superhydrophobic spherical-like α-FeOOH films on the wood surface by a hydrothermal method. Colloids Surf A 403:29–34.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2012.03.051 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Xi J, Feng L, Jiang L (2008) A general approach for fabrication of superhydrophobic and superamphiphobic surfaces. Appl Phys Lett 92:053102.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2839403 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Xie Y, Krause A, Militz H, Mai C (2006) Coating performance of finishes on wood modified with an N-methylol compound. Prog Org Coat 57:291–300.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.porgcoat.2006.06.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Xie Y, Krause A, Militz H, Mai C (2008) Weathering of uncoated and coated wood treated with methylated 1,3-dimethylol-4,5-dihydroxyethyleneurea (mDMDHEU). Holz Roh-Werkst 66:455–464.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-008-0270-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Yao Q, Wang C, Fan B, Wang H, Sun Q, Jin C, Zhang H (2016) One-step solvothermal deposition of ZnO nanorod arrays on a wood surface for robust superamphiphobic performance and superior ultraviolet resistance. Sci Rep 6:35505.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep35505 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Yu B, Woo P, Erb U (2007) Corrosion behaviour of nanocrystalline copper foil in sodium hydroxide solution. Scripta Mater 56:353–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Yuan Z et al (2013) A novel fabrication of a superhydrophobic surface with highly similar hierarchical structure of the lotus leaf on a copper sheet. Appl Surf Sci 285:205–210.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.08.037 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zheng JY, Bao SH, Guo Y, Jin P (2014) Natural hydrophobicity and reversible wettability conversion of flat anatase TiO2 thin film ACS. Appl Mater Interfaces 6:1351–1355.  https://doi.org/10.1021/am404470e CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zheng J, Bao S, Jin P (2015) TiO2 (R)/VO2 (M)/TiO2 (A) multilayer film as smart window: combination of energy-saving, antifogging and self-cleaning functions. Nano Energy 11:136–145.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2014.09.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zheng J, Lv Y, Xu S, Han X, Zhang S, Hao J, Liu W (2017) Nanostructured TiN-based thin films by a novel and facile synthetic route. Mater Des 113:142–148.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2016.10.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zhu H et al (2016) Wood-derived materials for green electronics, biological devices, and energy applications. Chem Rev 116:9305–9374.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00225 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Bio-based Material Science and Technology, Ministry of Education, Northeast Forestry UniversityHarbinChina
  2. 2.College of Material Science and EngineeringNortheast Forestry UniversityHarbinChina
  3. 3.School of TechnologyHarbin CollegeHarbinChina
  4. 4.Department of Mechanical and Energy EngineeringUniversity of North TexasDentonUSA
  5. 5.Nanjing Forestry UniversityNanjingChina
  6. 6.State Key Laboratory of Bio-Fibers and Eco-TextilesQingdao UniversityQingdaoChina

Personalised recommendations