Advertisement

European Journal of Wood and Wood Products

, Volume 77, Issue 1, pp 57–62 | Cite as

Quality assessment of the drying process for Eucalyptus delegatensis timber using greenhouse solar drying technology

  • Khamtan PhonetipEmail author
  • Barbara Ozarska
  • Gerry Harris
  • Benoit Belleville
  • Graham Ian Brodie
Original
  • 49 Downloads

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the process of drying Eucalyptus delegatensis in a greenhouse solar kiln. Specific objectives were to assess stress formation, moisture gradients and timber distortion, the moisture content distribution within various sections of the timber stack, and internal checking and collapse development within the boards. The maximal temperature and relative humidity (RH) in the daytime were set at 43 °C/72% RH. At night time, the temperature was at ambient condition with 90% RH. The strain measurements were undertaken before and after the samples were sliced. The timber quality at the end of drying was assessed based on Australian and New Zealand standard (AS/NZS 4787:2001). The moisture content values in the three different sections (front, middle and end) of 2400 mm long boards were compared by Analysis of Variance. The results showed that the mean compressive strain was − 2 × 10− 4 mm/mm in the core layers and the tensile strain was 14 × 10− 4 mm/mm in the outer layers. All sample boards were within the acceptable limits for cupping, spring and bow, even though the relative humidity level did not reach the set value. However, the amount of twist in three out of twelve sample boards was above the acceptable limit. Mean moisture gradient was 0.6%. There was a significant difference in moisture content at the end section compared to the front and middle sections. Internal checking, collapse and residual stress were graded as Class “C” (class A is the highest grade and D is the lowest).

Notes

References

  1. AS (2007) AS 2082 Timber-Hardwood-Visually Stress-graded for structural purposes. AS (Australian Standard)Google Scholar
  2. AS/NZS (2001) AS/NZS 4787 Timber—assessment of drying quality. SAI GLOBAL, Jointly published by Standards Australia International Ltd, GPO Box 5420, Sydney, NSW 2001 and Standards New Zealand, Private Bag 2439, Wellington 6020Google Scholar
  3. Blakemore P, Langrish T (2008) Effect of pre-drying schedule ramping on collapse recovery and internal checking with victorian ash eucalypts. Wood Sci Technol 42:473–492.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00226-008-0185-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brodie G (2008) Innovative wood drying. Applying microwave and solar technologies to wood drying. VDM Verlag Dr. Muller Aktiengesellschaft & Co. KG Dudweiler Landstr. 125 a, 66123 Saarbrucken, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  5. Chadwick W, Langrish T (1996) A comparison of drying time and timber quality in the contihuous and cyclic drying of australian turpentine. Timber Dry Technol 14:895–909.  https://doi.org/10.1080/07373939608917130 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chafe SC (1995) Preheating and continuous and intermittent drying in boards of eucalyptus regnans F. Muell. I. Effect on internal checking. Shrinkage Collapse Holzforschung 49:227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chua K, Mujumdar A, Chou S (2003) Intermittent drying of bioproducts––an overview. Bioresour Technol 90:285–295.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0960-8524(03)00133-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Haque M (2006) Modelling of solar kilns and the development of an optimised schedule for drying hardwood timber. PhD Thesis, The University of SydneyGoogle Scholar
  9. Harris G (2012) Use of solar kilns in Indonesia. Australian Center for International Agricultural ResearchGoogle Scholar
  10. Hasan M, Langrish T (2014) Numerical simulation of a solar kiln design for drying timber with different geographical and climatic conditions in Australia. Dry Technol 32:1632–1639.  https://doi.org/10.1080/07373937.2014.915556 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Herritsch A, Dronfield J, Nijdam JJ (2010) Intermittent and continuous drying of red beech timber from the green condition. Dry Technol 28:269–277.  https://doi.org/10.1080/07373930903530287 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kauman WG (1960) Contribution to the theory of cell collapse in wood: Investigations with Eucalyptus regnans. Aus J App Sci 11(1):122–145Google Scholar
  13. Khater HA, Helwa NH, Enayet MM, Hashish MI (2004) Optimization of solar kiln for drying wood. Dry Technol 22:677–701.  https://doi.org/10.1081/DRT-120034257 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kumar C, Karim M, Joardder MU (2014) Intermittent drying of food products: a critical review. J Food Eng 121:48–57.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2013.08.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Langrish T (2013) Comparing continuous and cyclic drying schedules for processing hardwood timber: the importance of mechanosorptive. Strain Dry Technol 31:1091–1098.  https://doi.org/10.1080/07373937.2013.769449 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. llic J, Boland D, MacDonald M, Downes G, Blakemore P (2000) National carbon accounting system. CSIRO Forestry and Forest ProductsGoogle Scholar
  17. Luna D, Nadeau JP, Jannot Y (2009) Solar timber kilns: State of the art and foreseeable developments renewable and sustainable. Energy Rev 13:1446–1455.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2008.08.017 Google Scholar
  18. McMillen JM (1955) Drying stresses in red oak forest products laboratory. For Prod J 5(1):71–76 (Accessed 19//11/2017) Google Scholar
  19. Pirasteh G, Saidur R, Rahman SMA, Rahim NA (2014) A review on development of solar drying applications renewable and sustainable. Energy Rev 31:133–148.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.11.052 Google Scholar
  20. Satta M (1994) Major energy saving by use of solar timber drying in developing countries. Renewab Energy 5:457–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Simpson W, Tschernitz J (1984) Solar dry kiln for tropical latitudes. For Prod J 34:25–34Google Scholar
  22. Singh P, Shrivastava V, Kumar A (2018) Recent developments in greenhouse solar drying: a review renewable and sustainable. Energy Rev 82:3250–3262.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.10.020 Google Scholar
  23. Ugwu SN, Ugwuishiwu BO, Ekechukwu OV, Njoku H, Ani AO (2015) Design, construction, and evaluation of a mixed mode solar kiln with black-painted pebble bed for timber seasoning in a tropical setting renewable and sustainable. Energy Rev 41:1404–1412.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.09.033 Google Scholar
  24. VijayaVenkataRaman S, Iniyan S, Goic R (2012) A review of solar drying technologies renewable and sustainable. Energy Rev 16:2652–2670.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.01.007 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Ecosystem and Forest Sciences, Faculty of ScienceThe University of MelbourneRichmondAustralia
  2. 2.Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, Dookie CampusThe University of MelbourneRichmondAustralia
  3. 3.Department of Forest Economics and Wood Technology, Faculty of Forest ScienceThe National University of LaosVientiane CapitalLaos

Personalised recommendations