Advertisement

European Journal of Wood and Wood Products

, Volume 77, Issue 1, pp 63–70 | Cite as

Effects of moisture content on elastic constants of fir wood

  • T. Yilmaz AydinEmail author
  • A. Ozveren
Original
  • 72 Downloads

Abstract

In this study, the effect of moisture on elastic properties of fir wood (Abies cilicica Carr.) was investigated. Three moduli of elasticity in principal directions (EL, ER, ET), six Poisson’s ratios (υLR, υLT, υRT, υTR, υRL, υTL) and three shear moduli (GLR, GRT, GLT) were determined using compression tests. Compression strength in principal directions was also determined. Clear and small wood specimens were conditioned at 20 °C and 45, 65 and 85% relative humidity. Stress–strain curves of the samples were obtained using bi-axial extensometer in order to calculate elastic constants. Test results indicated that moisture content significantly reduced the measured properties except for Poisson’s ratio. The elastic modulus in the three principal directions is significantly different. Well-known order of EL > ER > ET for elasticity, and L > T > R for compression strength is valid. Shear modulus obeys the GLR > GLT > GRT rule. The results of this study can provide sufficient data for modeling of the elements or system’s behavior under load using fir wood.

Notes

References

  1. Aira JR, Arriaga F, Gonzalez GI (2014) Determination of elastic constants of Scots pine wood by means of compression tests. Biosyst Eng 126:12–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aydın M, Ciritcioğlu H (2018) Shear moduli prediction of Calabria pine (Pinus brutia ten.) using ultrasonic wave propagation. Düzce Univ J of Sci Technol 6(1):176–187Google Scholar
  3. Aydın S, Yardımcı MY, Ramyar K (2007) Mechanical properties of Four Species Commonly used in Turkey. Turkish J of Eng Environ Sci 31:19–27Google Scholar
  4. Aydın M, Ciritcioğlu HH, Yılmaz Aydın T (2017) Shear modulus determination of black pine wood using ultrasound. In: 20th International Nondestructive Testing and Evaluation of Wood Symposium. Wisconsin; USA; 12–15 September, pp. 237–243Google Scholar
  5. Bodig J (1965) The effect of anatomy on the initial stress–strain relationship in transverse compression. Forest Prod J 15(5):197–202Google Scholar
  6. Bodig J, Goodman JR (1975) Prediction of elastic parameters of wood. Wood Sci 5:249–264Google Scholar
  7. Bodig J, Jayne BA (1982) Mechanics of wood and wood composites. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Bodig J, Jayne BA (1993) Mechanics of wood and wood composites. Krieger Publishing, MalabarGoogle Scholar
  9. Dinwoodie JM (2000) Timber: its nature and behaviour. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Divos F, Tanaka T, Nagao H, Kato H (1998) Determination of shear modulus on construction size timber. Wood Sci Technol 32:393–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gerhards CC (1982) Effect of moisture content and temperature on the mechanical properties of wood: an analysis of immediate effects. Wood Fiber Sci 14(1):4–36Google Scholar
  12. Gillis PP (1972) Orthotropic elastic constants of wood. Wood Sci Technol 6(2):138–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Güntekin E, Demiratlı S (2017) Influence of moisture content on some elastic constants of black pine subjected to compression. ProLigno 13(2):21–26Google Scholar
  14. Güntekin E, Yılmaz Aydın T (2013) Effects of moisture content on some mechanical properties of Turkish red pine (Pinus brutia Ten.). In: International Caucasian Forestry Symposium proceedings. Artvin; Turkey; 24–26 October, pp 878–883Google Scholar
  15. Güntekin E, Yılmaz Aydın T (2016) Prediction of bending properties for some softwood species grown in Turkey using ultrasound. Wood Res 61(6):993–1002Google Scholar
  16. Güntekin E, Yılmaz Aydin T, Niemz P (2015) Prediction of compression properties in three orthotropic directions for some important Turkish wood species using ultrasound. BioResour 10(4):7252–7262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Harrison SK (2006) Comparison of shear modulus test methods. Master’s Thesis, Virginia Polytechnic and State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  18. Haygreen JG, Bowyer JL (1982) Forest products and wood science: an introduction. Iowa State University Press, AmesGoogle Scholar
  19. Hearmon RFS (1948) The elasticity of wood and plywood. Department of Science and Industry Research, Forest Products Research Special Rep7. HMSO, LondonGoogle Scholar
  20. Hearmon RFS, Barkas WW (1941) The effect of grain direction on the Young’s moduli and rigidity moduli of beech and sitka spruce. Proc Phys Soc 53(6):674–680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hekimoglu V (2014) Production feasibility of nanoclay added cross laminated timber manufactured by using fir and pine woods (In Turkish: Göknar ve Sarıçam odunlarından nanokil ilaveli çapraz lamine kereste üretim olanaklarının incelenmesi). MSc. Thesis, Bartın University Graduate School of Applied SciGoogle Scholar
  22. Hering S, Keunecke D, Niemz P (2012) Moisture-dependent orthotropic elasticity of beech wood. Wood Sci Technol 45:927–938CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ilter E, Çamlıyurt C, Balkız ÖD (2001) Reserches on the determination of the surface roughness values of Bommullerian Fir (Abies bommülleriana Mattf.) (In Turkish: Uludag Göknarı (Abies bommülleriana mattf.) Odununun Yüzey Pürüzlülük Değerlerinin Belirlenmesi Üzerine Araştırmalar). Central Anatolia Forestry Research Institute, AnkaraGoogle Scholar
  24. Jeong GY, Hindman DP, Zink-Sharp A (2010) Orthotropic properties of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) strands. J of Mater Sci 45:5820–5830CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kennedy RW (1968) Wood in transverse compression: Influence of some anatomical variables and density on behavior. For Prod J 18(3):36–40Google Scholar
  26. Keskin H (2002) Physical and Mechanical Properties of Laminated Uludag Fir Wood Materials (In Turkish: Lamine Uludağ Göknarı (Abies Bornmülleriana) odununun bazı fiziksel ve mekanik özellikleri). J Ind Arts Educ Fac Gazi Univ 10(11):127–136Google Scholar
  27. Kol HS (2010) Characteristics of heat-treated Turkish pine and fir wood after ThermoWood processing. J Environ Biol 31(6):1007–1011Google Scholar
  28. Kretschmann DE (2010) Mechanical properties of wood. In: Ross RJ (ed) Wood handbook: wood as an engineering material. USDA Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, Madison, pp 5–44Google Scholar
  29. Kretschmann DE, Green DW (1996) Modeling moisture content-mechanical property relationships for clear Southern Pine. Wood Fiber Sci 28(3):320–337Google Scholar
  30. Lanvermann C, Hass P, Wittel FK, Niemz P (2014) Mechanical properties of Norway spruce: intra-ring variation and generic behavior of earlywood and latewood until failure. BioResources 9(1):105–119Google Scholar
  31. Liu JY, Ross R (2005) Relationship between radial compressive modulus of elasticity and shear modulus of wood. Wood Fiber Sci 37(2):201–206Google Scholar
  32. Mizutani M, Ando K (2015) Influence of a wide range of moisture contents on the Poisson’s ratio of wood. J Wood Sci 61:81–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Neumann A (1988) Identification and evaluation of the elastic properties of solid wood depending on the moisture and anisotropy. MSc. Thesis, Dresden Technical University, Dresden, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  34. Ozciftci A, Batan F (2009) Effect of some mechanical properties on wood materials impregnated with Waste Boron Oil (In Turkish: Bor yağının ağaç malzemenin bazı mekanik özelliklerine etkisi). J Polytechn 12(4):287–292Google Scholar
  35. Ozyhar T, Hering S, Sanabria SJ, Niemz P (2013) Determining moisture-dependent elastic characteristics of beech wood by means of ultrasonic waves. Wood Sci Technol 47:329–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Shmulsky R, Jones DP (2011) Forest products and wood science: an introduction. Wiley-Blackwell, West SussexCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Winandy JE, Rowell RM (2005) Chemistry of wood strength. In: Rowell RM (ed) Handbook of wood chemistry and wood composites. CRC Press, Florida, pp 303–347Google Scholar
  38. Yılmaz Aydın T, Aydın M (2017a) Young modulus determination of Turkish red pine wood by destructive and nondestructive test methods. In: 20th International Nondestructive Testing and Evaluation of Wood Symposium. Wisconsin; USA; 12–15 September, pp 229–236Google Scholar
  39. Yılmaz Aydın T, Aydın M (2017b) Determination of compression properties in radial direction of Oriental beech exposed to temperature using ultrasound and static tests. In: 20th International Nondestructive Testing and Evaluation of Wood Symposium. Wisconsin; USA; 12–15 September, pp 249–254Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Forest Industrial Engineering, Faculty of ForestryApplied Sciences University of IspartaIspartaTurkey

Personalised recommendations