Biocidal potential of the extractives of four Malaysian timbers against subterranean termites and wood decay fungi
- 43 Downloads
Wood extracts of four selected Malaysian timbers, Neobalanocarpus heimii, Cotylelobium lanceolatum, Madhuca utilis and Shorea curtisii, were tested at various concentrations against the subterranean termites, Coptotermes curvignathus and C. gestroi, and the fungi, Trametes versicolor (white-rot), Lentinus sajor-caju (white-rot), and Coniophera puteana (brown-rot). Paper discs were treated with 0.5, 1, and 2% w/v extracts and exposed to termites using a no-choice test. For the wood decay test, blocks of a non-durable species, Hevea brasiliensis, were treated with 2, 4, 6, and 8% of each extractive concentration and exposed to termites for a 12-week period. The results showed that 2% w/v of N. heimii extract was highly effective against both the termite species, C. curvignathus and C. gestroi after 10 days of exposure, leading to complete mortality with slight attack of the filter paper (mass loss = 1.10% and 0.69%, respectively). The 0.5% w/v extract resulted in 50% termite mortality with 2.53% and 1.42% filter paper consumption. Maximum weight losses were observed with 2% of each wood extractive against each fungus tested. Higher concentrations were needed when it comes to controlling fungi. The results from this study indicate that Malaysian wood extracts show some promise as alternative termiticides or fungicides.
The authors are very grateful to acknowledge the support of the Ministry of Natural Resources and Environmental, Malaysia for providing the scholarships for this study. This paper is part of the first author’s PhD thesis. The authors also thank the staff of Wood Entomology Laboratory, Forest Research Institute of Malaysia (FRIM), Malaysia and Wood Science Laboratory, Bangor University, United Kingdom for their invaluable technical support and assistance in the laboratory studies.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors have declared that they have no conflict of interest.
- Abdul Razak MA, Low CK, Azizol AK (1982) A phytochemical screening of some Malaysian hardwoods. Malaysian Forester 45(3):398–403Google Scholar
- Ani S, Mohd Shukari M, Mohd Dahlan J (2002) Properties and uses of commercial timbers of Peninsular Malaysia. Technical Guide No. 7. Forest Research Institute Malaysia, Kepong, MalaysiaGoogle Scholar
- ASTM D2017 (2005) Standard method of accelerated laboratory testing of natural decay resistance of wood. ASTM D2017. In: ASTM annual book of standards vol 4.10 wood. American Society for Testing and Materials. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), West Conshohocken, pp 344–348Google Scholar
- Croteau R, Kutchan TM, Lewis NG (2000) Natural products (secondary metabolites) Chap. 24. Biochemistry and molecular biology of plants. Am Soc Plant Physiol 24:1250–1318Google Scholar
- Farkhanda M, Narjis N, Saadiya AM, Bina SS, Azka S, Sobiya P (2012) Chemical analysis and comparison of antitermitic activity of essential oils of neem (Azadirachta indica), vetiver (Vetiveria zizanioides) and mint (Mentha arvensis) against Heterotermes indicola (Wasmann) from Pakistan. Asian J Chem 24:2069–2074Google Scholar
- Grace JK (2003) Approaches to biological control of termites. Sociobiology 41:115–120Google Scholar
- Khan MA, Ahmad W (2017) Termites and sustainable management: Economic losses and management. Vol. 2. Springer, Heidelberg. ISBN 978-3-319-68726-1Google Scholar
- Kusuma IW, Tachibana S (2007) Antifungal compounds isolated from tropical and temperate wood. In: Argyropoulos DS. (ed.) Material, chemicals and energy from forest biomass. American Chemical Society, Washington D.C., pp 377–390Google Scholar
- Majid AHA, Ahmad AH, Gurbel SS (2013) Laboratory evaluation of transfer effect of termiticides as a slow-acting treatment against subterranean termite Coptotemes gestroi (Isotera: Rhinotermitidae). Int J Entomol Res 01(01):32–41Google Scholar
- Roszaini K (2011) Wood extractives as natural preservatives against termite and fungi. PhD Thesis. Bangor University, United Kingdom. 406 ppGoogle Scholar
- Roszaini K, Nor Azah MA, Mailina J, Zaini S, Mohammad Faridz Z (2013) Toxicity and antitermite activity of the essential oils from Cinnamomum camphora, Cymbopogon nardus, Melaleuca cajuputi and Dipterocarpus sp. against Coptotermes curvignathus. Wood Sci Technol 47(6):1273–1284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Roszaini K, Nor Azah MA, Zaini S, Zaitihaiza K (2014) Anti-termitic potential of heartwood and bark extract and chemical compounds isolated from Madhuca utilis Ridl. H. J. Lam and Neobalanocarpus heimii King P. S. Ashton Holzforschung 68(6):713–720Google Scholar
- Roszaini K, Hale MD, Salmiah U (2016) In-vitro decay resistance of 12 Malaysian broadleaf hardwood trees as a function of wood density and extractives compounds. J Trop For Sci 28(4):533–540Google Scholar
- Sakai K (2001) Chemistry of bark. In: Hon DNS, Shiraishi N (eds.) Wood and cellulosic chemistry, 2nd edn. Marcel Decker, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Taylor AM, Gartner BL, Morrell JJ (2002) Heartwood formation and natural durability—a review. Wood Fib Sci 34:587–611Google Scholar
- Watanabe Y, Mihara R, Mitsunaga T, Yoshimura T (2005) Termite repellent sesquiterpenoids from Callitris glaucophylla heartwood. Forest Ecol Manag 258:1918–1923Google Scholar
- Yang G, Jaakkola P (2011) Wood chemistry and isolation of extractives from wood. Literature study for BIOTULI project. Saimaa University of Applied Sciences, South KareliaGoogle Scholar