European Journal of Wood and Wood Products

, Volume 77, Issue 1, pp 147–155 | Cite as

Biocidal potential of the extractives of four Malaysian timbers against subterranean termites and wood decay fungi

  • Roszaini KadirEmail author
  • Mike Hale


Wood extracts of four selected Malaysian timbers, Neobalanocarpus heimii, Cotylelobium lanceolatum, Madhuca utilis and Shorea curtisii, were tested at various concentrations against the subterranean termites, Coptotermes curvignathus and C. gestroi, and the fungi, Trametes versicolor (white-rot), Lentinus sajor-caju (white-rot), and Coniophera puteana (brown-rot). Paper discs were treated with 0.5, 1, and 2% w/v extracts and exposed to termites using a no-choice test. For the wood decay test, blocks of a non-durable species, Hevea brasiliensis, were treated with 2, 4, 6, and 8% of each extractive concentration and exposed to termites for a 12-week period. The results showed that 2% w/v of N. heimii extract was highly effective against both the termite species, C. curvignathus and C. gestroi after 10 days of exposure, leading to complete mortality with slight attack of the filter paper (mass loss = 1.10% and 0.69%, respectively). The 0.5% w/v extract resulted in 50% termite mortality with 2.53% and 1.42% filter paper consumption. Maximum weight losses were observed with 2% of each wood extractive against each fungus tested. Higher concentrations were needed when it comes to controlling fungi. The results from this study indicate that Malaysian wood extracts show some promise as alternative termiticides or fungicides.



The authors are very grateful to acknowledge the support of the Ministry of Natural Resources and Environmental, Malaysia for providing the scholarships for this study. This paper is part of the first author’s PhD thesis. The authors also thank the staff of Wood Entomology Laboratory, Forest Research Institute of Malaysia (FRIM), Malaysia and Wood Science Laboratory, Bangor University, United Kingdom for their invaluable technical support and assistance in the laboratory studies.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared that they have no conflict of interest.


  1. Abdul Razak MA, Low CK, Azizol AK (1982) A phytochemical screening of some Malaysian hardwoods. Malaysian Forester 45(3):398–403Google Scholar
  2. Ani S, Mohd Shukari M, Mohd Dahlan J (2002) Properties and uses of commercial timbers of Peninsular Malaysia. Technical Guide No. 7. Forest Research Institute Malaysia, Kepong, MalaysiaGoogle Scholar
  3. ASTM D2017 (2005) Standard method of accelerated laboratory testing of natural decay resistance of wood. ASTM D2017. In: ASTM annual book of standards vol 4.10 wood. American Society for Testing and Materials. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), West Conshohocken, pp 344–348Google Scholar
  4. Blanchette RA (2000) A review of microbial deterioration found in archaeological wood from different environments. Int Biodeterior Biodegr 46:189–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Croteau R, Kutchan TM, Lewis NG (2000) Natural products (secondary metabolites) Chap. 24. Biochemistry and molecular biology of plants. Am Soc Plant Physiol 24:1250–1318Google Scholar
  6. Farkhanda M, Narjis N, Saadiya AM, Bina SS, Azka S, Sobiya P (2012) Chemical analysis and comparison of antitermitic activity of essential oils of neem (Azadirachta indica), vetiver (Vetiveria zizanioides) and mint (Mentha arvensis) against Heterotermes indicola (Wasmann) from Pakistan. Asian J Chem 24:2069–2074Google Scholar
  7. Grace JK (2003) Approaches to biological control of termites. Sociobiology 41:115–120Google Scholar
  8. Hillis WE (1987) Heartwood and tree exudates. Amount of extractives. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ishida Y, Goto K, Hiroaki Y, Tsuge S, Ohtani H, Sonoda T, Ona T (2007) Direct analysis of phenolic extractives in wood by thermochemolysis-gas chromatography in the presence of tetrabutylammonium hydroxide. J Anal Appl Pyrol 78:200–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Johnston SR, Boddy L, Weightman AJ (2016) Bacteria in decomposing wood and their interactions with wood-decay fungi. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 92(11):1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Khan MA, Ahmad W (2017) Termites and sustainable management: Economic losses and management. Vol. 2. Springer, Heidelberg. ISBN 978-3-319-68726-1Google Scholar
  12. Kirker GT, Blodgett AB, Arango RA, Lebow PK, Clausen CA (2013) The role of extractives in naturally durable wood species. Int Biodeterior Biodegr 82:53–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kusuma IW, Tachibana S (2007) Antifungal compounds isolated from tropical and temperate wood. In: Argyropoulos DS. (ed.) Material, chemicals and energy from forest biomass. American Chemical Society, Washington D.C., pp 377–390Google Scholar
  14. Majid AHA, Ahmad AH, Gurbel SS (2013) Laboratory evaluation of transfer effect of termiticides as a slow-acting treatment against subterranean termite Coptotemes gestroi (Isotera: Rhinotermitidae). Int J Entomol Res 01(01):32–41Google Scholar
  15. Messer A, McCormick K, Sunjaya Hagedorn HH, Tumbel F, Meinwald J (1990) Defensive role of tropical tree resins: antitermitic sesquiterpenes from Southeast Asian Dipterocarpaceae. J Chem Ecol 16:3333–3352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ohkuma M (2003) Termite symbiotic systems: efficient bio-recycling of lignocellulose. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 61:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Onuorah E (2000) The wood preservative potential of heartwood extracts of Milicia excelsa and Erythrophleum suaveolens. Bioresour Technol 75(2):171–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rodrigues AMS, Stien D, Eparvier DV, Espindola LS, Beauchene J, Amusant N, Lemenager N, Baudasse C, Raguina L (2012) The wood preservative potential of long-lasting Amazonian wood extracts. Int Biodeterior Biodegr 75:146–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Roszaini K (2011) Wood extractives as natural preservatives against termite and fungi. PhD Thesis. Bangor University, United Kingdom. 406 ppGoogle Scholar
  20. Roszaini K, Hale MD (2017) Antioxidant potential and content of phenolic compounds in extracts of twelve selected Malaysian commercial wood species. Eur J Wood Prod 75:615–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Roszaini K, Nor Azah MA, Mailina J, Zaini S, Mohammad Faridz Z (2013) Toxicity and antitermite activity of the essential oils from Cinnamomum camphora, Cymbopogon nardus, Melaleuca cajuputi and Dipterocarpus sp. against Coptotermes curvignathus. Wood Sci Technol 47(6):1273–1284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Roszaini K, Nor Azah MA, Zaini S, Zaitihaiza K (2014) Anti-termitic potential of heartwood and bark extract and chemical compounds isolated from Madhuca utilis Ridl. H. J. Lam and Neobalanocarpus heimii King P. S. Ashton Holzforschung 68(6):713–720Google Scholar
  23. Roszaini K, Hale MD, Salmiah U (2016) In-vitro decay resistance of 12 Malaysian broadleaf hardwood trees as a function of wood density and extractives compounds. J Trop For Sci 28(4):533–540Google Scholar
  24. Sakai K (2001) Chemistry of bark. In: Hon DNS, Shiraishi N (eds.) Wood and cellulosic chemistry, 2nd edn. Marcel Decker, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Salem MXM, Zidan YE, Hadidi EL, Mansour NMN, Abo Elgat MMA (2016) Evaluation of usage three natural extracts applied to three commercial wood species against five common molds. Int Biodeterior Biodegr 110:206–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Silva CA, Monteiro MBB, Brozolin S, Lopez ACG, Richter A, Braga MR (2007) Biodeterioration of brazilwood Caesalpinia echinata Lam. (Leguminosae – Caesalpinioideae) by rot fungi and termites. Int Biodeterior Biodegr 60:285–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Taylor AM, Gartner BL, Morrell JJ (2002) Heartwood formation and natural durability—a review. Wood Fib Sci 34:587–611Google Scholar
  28. Vek V, Oven P, Humar M (2013) Phenolic extractives of wound-associated wood of beech and their fungicidal effect. Int Biodeterior Biodegr 77:91–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Verma M, Sharma S, Prasad R (2009) Biological alternatives for termite control: a review. Int Biodeterior Biodegr 63:959–972CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Watanabe Y, Mihara R, Mitsunaga T, Yoshimura T (2005) Termite repellent sesquiterpenoids from Callitris glaucophylla heartwood. Forest Ecol Manag 258:1918–1923Google Scholar
  31. Weber JFF, Wahab IA, Marzuki A, Thomas NF, Kadir AA, Hadi AHA, Awang K, Abdul Latiff A, Richomme P, Delaunay J (2001) Heimiol A, a new dimeric stilbenoid from Neobalanocarpus heimii. Tetrahedron Lett 42(29):4895–4897. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Yang G, Jaakkola P (2011) Wood chemistry and isolation of extractives from wood. Literature study for BIOTULI project. Saimaa University of Applied Sciences, South KareliaGoogle Scholar
  33. Zhang X, Nguyen D, Paice M, Tsang Renaud S (2007) Degradation of wood extractives on thermo-mechanical pulp by soybean lipoxygenase. Enzyme Microb Technol 40:866–873CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Forest Research Institute Malaysia (FRIM)Kuala LumpurMalaysia
  2. 2.School of Environment, Natural Resources and GeographyBangor UniversityBangorUK

Personalised recommendations