Advertisement

European Journal of Wood and Wood Products

, Volume 76, Issue 2, pp 549–562 | Cite as

Effect of short-term thermomechanical densification of wood veneers on the properties of birch plywood

  • Pavlo BekhtaEmail author
  • Ján Sedliačik
  • Dennis Jones
Original

Abstract

In this study, the physical and mechanical properties of plywood panels made from pre-compressed birch (Betula verrucosa Ehrh.) veneer were evaluated. Veneer sheets underwent short-term thermo-mechanical (STTM) compression at temperatures of 150 or 180 °C and at pressures of 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0 or 3.5 MPa for a period of 1 min prior to adhesive being applied and pressed into panels using phenol formaldehyde adhesive at 100 g/m2 spread rate; this was one-third less than the adhesive spread used for the control panels (150 g/m2). The pressing pressure was 1.0 MPa, which was almost half of the pressure used for the control panels (1.8 MPa); and pressing time was 3 min, also half of the pressing time used for the control panels (6 min). The results showed that surface roughness of compressed veneer, water absorption and thickness swelling of plywood panels made from compressed veneer were significantly improved. The shear strength values of plywood panels made from compressed birch veneer even with reduced adhesive spread were higher than those of plywood panels made from uncompressed veneer. The findings in this study indicated that compression of birch veneer could be considered as an alternative to produce more eco-friendly (owing to smaller adhesive spread) value-added material with enhanced properties.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge COST Action FP1303 “Performance of bio-based building materials” for support of STSM-FP1303-010615-060045. This work was supported by the Slovak Research and Development Agency under the contract no APVV-14-0506 and APVV-15-0235. Special thanks are extended to Ing. B. Lizoň for making microscopic images of veneer samples surfaces before and after densification.

References

  1. Anshari B, Guan ZW, Kitamor A, Jung K, Hassel I, Komatsu K (2011) Mechanical and moisture-dependent swelling properties of compressed Japanese cedar. Constr Build Mater 25(4):1718–1725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arruda L, Del Menezzi CHS (2013) Effect of thermomechanical treatment on physical properties of wood veneers. Int Wood Prod J 4(4):217–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Asako Y, Kamikoga H, Nishimura H, Yamaguchi Y (2002) Effective thermal conductivity of compressed wood. Int J Heat Mass Transf 45(11):2243–2253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bekhta P, Krystofiak T (2016) The influence of short-term thermo-mechanical densification on the surface wettability of wood veneers. Maderas-Cienc Technol 18(1):79–90Google Scholar
  5. Bekhta PA, Marutzky R (2007) Reduction of glue consumption in the plywood production by using previously compressed veneer. Holz Roh Werkst 65(1):87–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bekhta P, Hiziroglu S, Shepelyuk O (2009) Properties of plywood manufactured from compressed veneer as building material. Mater Des 0(4):947–953CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bekhta PA, Niemz P, Sedliačik J (2012) Effect of pre-pressing of veneer on the glueability and properties of veneer-based products. Eur J Wood Prod 70(1):99–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bekhta P, Proszyk S, Krystofiak T (2014a) Colour in short-term thermo-mechanically densified veneer of various wood species. Eur J Wood Prod 72(6):785–797CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bekhta P, Proszyk S, Krystofiak T, Mamonova M, Pinkowski G, Lis B (2014b) Effect of thermomechanical densification on surface roughness of wood veneers. Wood Mater Sci Eng 9(4):233–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bekhta P, Proszyk S, Lis B, Krystofiak T (2014c) Gloss of thermally densified alder (Alnus glutinosa Goertn.), beech (Fagus sylvatica L.), birch (Betula verrucosa Ehrh.), and pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) wood veneers. Eur J Wood Prod 72(6):799–808CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bekhta P, Mamonova M, Sedliačik J, Novák I (2016) Anatomical study of short-term thermo-mechanically densified alder wood veneer with low moisture content. Eur J Wood Prod 74(5):643–652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bekhta P, Proszyk S, Krystofiak T, Sedliačik J, Novák I, Mamonova M (2017) Effect of short-term thermomechanical densification on the structure and properties of wood veneers. Wood Mater Sci Eng 12(1):40–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Burmester A (1973) Effect of heat-pressure treatments of semidry wood on its dimensional stability. Holz Roh Werkst 31:237–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Buyuksari U (2013) Surface characteristics and hardness of MDF panels laminated with thermally compressed veneer. Compos Part B-Eng 44:675–678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Buyuksari U, Hiziroglu S, Ayrilmis N, Akkilic H (2012) Mechanical and physical properties of medium density fiberboard panels laminated with thermally compressed veneer. Compos Part B-Eng 43(2):110–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Candan Z, Hiziroglu S, Mcdonald AG (2010) Surface quality of thermally compressed Douglas fir veneer. Mater Des 31(7):3574–3577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. de Melo RR, Del Menezzi CHS (2014) Influence of veneer thickness on the properties of LVL from Parica (Schizolobium amazonicum) plantation trees. Eur J Wood Prod 72:191–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Diouf PN, Stevanovic T, Cloutier A, Fang C-H, Blanchet P, Koubaa A, Mariotti N (2011) Effects of thermo-hygro-mechanical densification on the surface characteristics of trembling aspen and hybrid poplar wood veneers. Appl Surf Sci 257:3558–3564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. EN 314-1:2004. Plywood. Bonding quality. Part 1: test methods. European Committee for Standardization, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  20. EN 314-2 (1993) Plywood. Bonding quality. Part 2: requirements. European Committee for Standardization, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  21. EN 315 (2000) Plywood. Tolerances for dimensions. European Committee for Standardization, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  22. EN 317 (1993) Particleboards and fibreboards. Determination of swelling in thickness after immersion in water. European Committee for Standardization, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  23. Faust TD, Rice JT (1986) Effect of veneer surface roughness on glue-bond quality in Southern pine plywood. For Prod J 36(4):57–62Google Scholar
  24. ISO 4287 (1997) Geometrical product specification (GPS). Surface texture: profile method. Terms, definitions and surface texture parameters. International Organization for Standartization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  25. Laine K, Rautkari L, Hughes M, Kutnar A (2013) Reducing the set-recovery of surface densified solid scots pine wood by hydrothermal post-treatment. Eur J Wood Prod 71(1):17–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rautkari L, Hughes M, Properzi M, Pichelin F (2010) Properties and chemical changes of surface densified wood. In: Proceeding of the 11th World Conference on Timber Engineering, Trees and Timber Institute, National Research Council, Trentino, Italy, 20–24 June 2010, pp. 235–237Google Scholar
  27. Richter K, Feist WC, Knabe MT (1995) The effect of surface roughness on the performance of finishes. Part 1: roughness characterization and strain performance. For Prod J 45(7/8):91–97Google Scholar
  28. Sheldon S, Walker J (2006) Wood-based composites: plywood and veneer-based products. In: Walker J (ed) Primary wood processing: principles and practice, 2nd edn. Springer, New York, pp 391–426Google Scholar
  29. Tenorio C, Moya R, ·Muñoz F (2011) Comparative study on physical and mechanical properties of laminated veneer lumber and plywood panels made of wood from fast-growing Gmelina arborea trees. J Wood Sci 57:134–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Unsal O, Candan Z, Buyuksari U, Korkut S, Chang Y-S, Yeo H (2011) Effect of thermal compression treatment on the surface hardness, vertical density propile and thickness swelling of eucalyptus wood boards by hot-pressing. Mokchae Konghak 39(2):148–155Google Scholar
  31. Welzbacher CR, Wehsener J, Rapp AO, Haller P (2008) Thermo-mechanical densification combined with thermal modification of Norway spruce (Picea abies Karst) in industrial scale—dimensional stability and durability aspects. Holz Roh Werkst 66:39–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Wood-Based CompositesCellulose and Paper, Ukrainian National Forestry UniversityLvivUkraine
  2. 2.Department of Furniture and Wood ProductsTechnical University in ZvolenZvolenSlovakia
  3. 3.SP Technical Research Institute of SwedenStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations