European Journal of Wood and Wood Products

, Volume 75, Issue 1, pp 55–62

Influence of face-to-core layer ratio and core layer resin content on the properties of density-decreased particleboards



As a response to increased costs and a shortage in wood supply it is a current approach to reduce the amount of material in the manufacturing process of particleboard (PB). However, the production of lightweight PB by simply reducing density results in decreased panel properties. Thus, investigations to re-engineer the panel’s core layer are required in order to achieve density-reduced panels which meet minimum property requirements (e.g., EN 312), edge processability and surface coatability. The intention of the present paper is to investigate the influence of potentially occurring changes in the face-to-core layer ratio (35/65…57/43) and core layer resin content (8 %…22.3 %) on panel properties when reducing the density from 650 to 400 kg/m3.


  1. Balducci F, Harper C, Meinlschmidt P, Dix B, Sanasi A (2008) Development of innovative particleboard panels. Drvna industrija 59(3):131–136Google Scholar
  2. Berggren P (2014) Industrialisierung moderner Leichtbauwerkstoffe für den Möbelbau. (Industrialization of modern lightweight construction materials for the building of furniture) (In German)]. Leichtbau-Symposium 2014, 4. December 2014, Herford, Germany. In: Benthien JT (2014) Mega-Trend, Zukunftsmusik oder Sackgasse? [Mega trend, future music or dead end?] (In German) Holz-Zentralblatt 2014(3):58–59Google Scholar
  3. EPF (2013) Annual Report 2013–2014. European Panel Federation, 19 June 2014, Bruges, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
  4. Gruchot (2009) In-situ-Untersuchungen des Rohdichteprofiles von Holzwerkstoffen am Beispiel von MDF [In-situ studies of the density profile of wood-based panels based on the example of MDF] (In German). Dissertation, Hamburg University, Hamburg, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  5. Michanickl A (2004) Light wood based panels—state of the art trend. In: 4th European wood-based panel symposium. Hannover, Germany. 15–17 Sept 2004. European Panel FederationGoogle Scholar
  6. Plath E, Schnitzler E (1974) Das Rohdichteprofil als Beurteilungsmerkmal von Spanplatten (The density profile, a criterion for evaluating particleboard) (In German) Holz Roh- Werkst 32:443–449Google Scholar
  7. Solbrig (2009) Optimierung und Evaluierung eines radiometrischen Dichtemessplatzes am Beispiel des Itrax Woodscanners [Optimization and evaluation of an radiometric density measuring station based on the example of the Itrax Woodscanner] (In German). Master thesis Hochschule Ostwestfalen-Lippe, Lemgo, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  8. Solbrig K, Frühwald K, Gruchot M, Ressel JB (2010) Rohdichteprofilbestimmung bei Holzwerkstoffen—“Itrax Woodscanner” als radiometrischer Labor-Dichtemessplatz für Holzwerkstoffe und Sonderanwendungen [Density profile determination on wood-based panels—“Itrax Woodscanner” as an radiometric laboratory density measuring station for wood-based panels and special applications] (In German). Holz-Zentralblatt 36:895–896Google Scholar
  9. Thoemen H (2008) Lightweight panels for the European furniture industry: Some recent developments. COST Action 49 processes and performance of wood-based panels, lightweight wood-based composites, production, properties and usage. Bled, Slovenia, 23–25 June 2008Google Scholar
  10. WPIF (2014) Panel Guide Version 4. Wood Panel Industries Federation ISBN 978-1-909594-21-0Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Thünen Institute of Wood ResearchHamburgGermany

Personalised recommendations