European Journal of Wood and Wood Products

, Volume 73, Issue 2, pp 235–243 | Cite as

Structural and acoustic properties of African padouk (Pterocarpus soyauxii) wood for xylophones

  • A. Straže
  • B. Mitkovski
  • J. Tippner
  • K. Čufar
  • Ž. Gorišek
Original

Abstract

The possibility of supplementing the subjective traditional assessment of wood quality for percussion instruments with reliable acoustic measurements was studied. Sawn boards of African padouk (Pterocarpus soyauxii Taub.) were selected in a timber yard and classified into five grades by using the dynamic combined specific modulus of elasticity. Then they were sawn into raw xylophone bars, which were afterwards traditionally graded by listening to the sound damping at flexural bending excitation and additionally by acoustic measurements. A high quality grade matching of xylophone bars and sawn boards was confirmed. Highly graded material was mostly quarter sawn with straight or moderately interlocked grain. The sound quality of raw xylophone bars was not influenced by the wood density. It negatively correlated with sound damping (tan δ) and positively with the specific modulus of elasticity and with absolute and relative acoustic conversion efficiency. The audial grading of xylophone bars could be improved or substituted by relative acoustic conversion efficiency.

References

  1. Aoki T, Yamada T (1972) The viscoelastic properties of wood used for the musical instruments I. Wood Res 52:13–42Google Scholar
  2. Aramaki M, Bailleres H, Brancheriau L, Kronland R, Ystad S (2007) Sound quality assessment of wood for xylophone bars. J Acoust Soc Am 121(4):2407–2420CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Brancheriau L, Bailléres H (2002) Natural vibration analysis of clear wooden beams: a theoretical review. Wood Sci Technol 36:347–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brancheriau L, Bailléres H, Detienne P, Gril J, Kronland R (2006a) Key signal and wood anatomy parameters related to the acoustic quality of wood for xylophone-type percussion instruments. J Wood Sci 52(3):1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brancheriau L, Bailléres H, Détienne P, Kronland R, Metzger B (2006b) Classifying xylophone bar materials by perceptual, signal processing and wood anatomy analysis. Ann For Sci 63:73–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brémaud I (2012) Acoustical properties of wood in string instruments soundboards and tuned idiophones: biological and cultural diversity. J Acoust Soc Am 131(1):807–818CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Brémaud I, Amusant N, Minato K, Gril J, Thibaut B (2010a) Effect of extractives on vibrational properties of African Padauk (Pterocarpus soyauxii Taub.). Wood Sci Technol 45:461–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brémaud I, Cabrolier P, Gril J, Clair B, Gérard J, Minato K, Thibaut B (2010b) Identification of anisotropic vibrational properties of Padauk wood with interlocked grain. Wood Sci Technol 44:355–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brémaud I, Minato K, Langbour P, Thibaut B (2010c) Physico-chemical indicators of inter-specific variability in vibration damping of wood. Ann For Sci 67(7):707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brémaud I, Kaim EY, Guibal D, Minato K, Thibaut B, Gril J (2012) Charecterization and categorization of the diversity of viscoelastic vibrational properties between 98 wood types. Ann For Sci 69:373–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Burmester A (1965) Relationship between velocity of sound [ultrasonic waves] and morphological, physical and mechanical properties of wood. Holz Roh Werkst 23:227–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Diouf P, Merlin A, Perrin D (2006) Antioxidant properties of wood extracts and colour stability of woods. Ann For Sci 63:525–534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Divos F, Tanaka T (2005) Relation between static and dynamic modulus of elasticity of wood. Acta silv lignaria Hung 1:105–110Google Scholar
  14. EN15251 (2007) Indoor environmental input parameters for design and assessment of energy performance of buildings-addressing indoor air quality, thermal environment, lighting and acoustics. CEN, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  15. Gerhards CC (1982) Longitudinal stress waves for lumber stress grading: factors affecting applications: state of the art. For Prod J 32:20–25Google Scholar
  16. Haines DW, Leban JM, Herbe C (1996) Determination of Young’s modulus for spruce, fir and isotropic materials by the resonance flexure method with comparisions to static flexure and other dynamic methods. Wood Sci Technol 30(4):253–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Holz D (1996) On some important properties of non-modified coniferous and leaved woods in view of mechanical and acoustical data in piano soundboards. Archiwun Akustyki 9:37–57Google Scholar
  18. King FE, Cotterill CB, Godson DH, Jurd L, King TJ (1953) The chemistry of extractives from hardwoods, Part XIII. Colourless constituents of Pterocarpus species. J Chem Soc 27:3693–3697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kitahara R, Matsumoto T (1973) Mechanism of damping in wood. Mokuzai Gakkaishi 19:373–378Google Scholar
  20. Kubojima Y, Okano T, Ohta M (1997) Effect of annual ring widths on structural and vibrational properties of wood. Mokuzai Gakkaishi 43(8):634–641Google Scholar
  21. Minato K, Konaka Y, Brémaud I, Suzuki S, Obataya E (2010) Extractives of muirapiranga (Brosimun sp.) and its effects on the vibrational properties of wood. J Wood Sci 56:41–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mitkovski B (2013) Structural and acoustical properties of wood for percussion instruments. University of Ljubljana, LjubljanaGoogle Scholar
  23. Obataya E (1999) Suitability of acetylated woods for clarinet reed. J Wood Sci 45:106–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Obataya E, Ono T, Norimoto M (2000) Vibrational properties of wood along the grain. J Mater Sci 35:2993–3001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ono T, Norimoto M (1983) Study on Young’s modulus and internal friction of wood in relation to the evaluation of wood for musical instruments. Jpn J Appl Phys 22:611–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ono T, Norimoto M (1984) On physical criteria for the selecting of wood for soundboards of musical instruments. Rheol Acta 23:652–656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Roohnia M, Hashemidizaji SF, Brancheriau L, Tajdini A, Hemmasi AH (2011a) Effect of soaking process in water on the acoustical quality of wood in traditional musical instruments. BioResources 6(2):2055–2065Google Scholar
  28. Roohnia M, Hossein MA, Alavitabar SE, Tajdini A, Jahanlatibari A, Manouchehri N (2011b) Acoustic properties in Arizona cypress logs: a tool to select wood for sounding board. BioResources 6(1):386–399Google Scholar
  29. Roohnia M, Tajdini A, Manouchehri N (2011c) Assessing wood in sounding boards considering the ratio of acoustical anisotropy. NDT E Int 44:13–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rujinirun C, Phinyocheap P, Prachyabrued W, Laemsak N (2005) Chemical treatment of wood for music instruments part I: acoustically important properties of wood for the Ranad (Thai traditional xylophone). Wood Sci Technol 39:77–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Shen J, Liu Y, Ming L, Yu L (2005) Effects of variance coefficient of growth ring width on sound vibration parameters of Picea wood. J Northeast For Univ 33(5):9–27Google Scholar
  32. Timoshenko S (1921) On the correction for shear of the differential equation for transverse vibrations of prismatic bars. Philos Mag J Sci 12(6):744–746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wegst UGK (2006) Wood for sound. Am J Bot 93:1439–1448CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Yano H, Minato K (1993) Controlling the timber of wooden musical instruments by chemical modification. Wood Sci Technol 27:287–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Yano H, Yamada T (1985) The dynamic mechanical properties of wood in the radial direction. Mokuzai Gakkaishi 31:222–230Google Scholar
  36. Yasuda R, Minato K (1994) Chemical modification of wood by non-formaldehyde crosslinking agents, part I: improvement of dimensional stability and acoustic properties. Wood Sci Technol 28:101–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Straže
    • 1
  • B. Mitkovski
    • 1
  • J. Tippner
    • 2
  • K. Čufar
    • 1
  • Ž. Gorišek
    • 1
  1. 1.Biotechnical FacultyUniversity of LjubljanaLjubljanaSlovenia
  2. 2.Faculty of Forestry and Wood TechnologyMendel University in BrnoBrnoCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations